Supreme Court of India

15,092 judgments

Year:

Hemavathi & Ors. v. V. Hombegowda & Anr.

11 Sep 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023INSC848

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order allowing a Regular Second Appeal without framing substantial questions of law and hearing all parties, emphasizing strict compliance with Section 100 CPC procedural requirements.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Regular Second Appeal substantial question of law condonation of delay

RPS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. v. MUKUL KUMAR & ANR.

11 Sep 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 SCC OnLine SC 842
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that belated claims arising from an arbitral award cannot be admitted after approval of the resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the mandatory nature of timelines to ensure finality in insolvency proceedings.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Resolution Professional Belated claim

Religare Finvest Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

11 Sep 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar · 2023INSC819

The Supreme Court held that criminal liability for offences committed by a dissolved bank does not transfer to the successor bank post-amalgamation, quashing proceedings against DBS Bank arising from LVB's alleged misconduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant amalgamation corporate criminal liability transferor company transferee company

CBI v. R.R. Kishore

11 Sep 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sanjiv Khanna; Abhay S. Oka; Vikram Nath...
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the declaration of unconstitutionality of Section 6A(1) of the DSPE Act applies retrospectively but Article 20(1) does not protect procedural provisions like Section 6A from retrospective invalidation, allowing investigations without prior approval to continue.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 6A DSPE Act Article 20 Constitution Retrospective effect Procedural provision

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd.

06 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that Life Insurance Corporation of India had no lawful authority to levy a Rs.250 service charge for recording assignment of life insurance policies, striking down the impugned circular as unconstitutional.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 38 Insurance Act assignment of insurance policy service charge Article 265 Constitution

Union Territory of Ladakh v. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference

06 Sep 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing the allotment of the 'Plough' election symbol to Jammu and Kashmir National Conference candidates in the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council elections, affirming constitutional courts' jurisdiction to ensure free and fair elections.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Election Symbols Order 1968 reserved election symbol Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council elections Jammu and Kashmir National Conference

Balwantbhai Somabhai Bhandari v. Hiralal Somabhai Contractor

06 Sep 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding of civil contempt for wilful breach of a court undertaking, affirmed penalties and voiding of sale deeds executed in contempt, emphasizing the binding nature of undertakings given to courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant civil contempt wilful disobedience undertaking to court Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Rajnish Kumar Rai v. Union of India

06 Sep 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that only the High Court within whose territorial jurisdiction the transferring Tribunal Bench sits can review transfer orders, and refused to transfer the case on grounds of inconvenience, dismissing the Special Leave Petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Central Administrative Tribunal transfer of proceedings Section 25 Administrative Tribunals Act

K. Hymavathi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

06 Sep 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a cheque issued within the limitation period towards a promissory note constitutes a legally enforceable debt, and quashing of proceedings under Section 138 NI Act on limitation grounds without evidence is improper.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 time-barred debt Section 25(3) Indian Contract Act

Rohit Chaudhary & Anr. v. M/S Vipul Ltd.

06 Sep 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar · 2023INSC807

The Supreme Court held that purchasers using goods for self-employment to earn livelihood are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act and allowed refund with interest for non-delivery of commercial office space.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 commercial purpose definition of consumer self-employment

Bachhu Yadav v. Directorate of Enforcement Government of India

06 Sep 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under PMLA, holding that a plausible explanation for alleged proceeds of crime predating the illegal activity period justifies bail subject to trial conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 bail proceeds of crime illegal mining

Roopa Soni v. Kamalnarayan Soni

06 Sep 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the wife's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage, emphasizing a liberal, contextual, and socially sensitive approach.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 divorce cruelty irretrievable breakdown

N. Ramkumar v. The State

06 Sep 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Aravind Kumar

The Supreme Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, modifying the sentence to time served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC murder culpable homicide not amounting to murder

Loonkaran Gandhi v. State of Maharashtra

06 Sep 2023 · Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act does not apply to acquisitions under the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, upheld refusal of alternate land allotment, and directed fresh determination of compensation at market value with statutory benefits due to inordinate delay.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 Section 11-A Section 48-A

R. Sreenivasa v. State of Karnataka

06 Sep 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that the last seen theory was not proved beyond reasonable doubt and the benefit of doubt must go to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen theory Section 106 Evidence Act burden of proof circumstantial evidence

Lal Bahadur Shastri Educational Society v. Delhi Development Authority

05 Sep 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court held that voluntary deposit of disputed additional FAR charges without adjudication of illegality does not entitle appellants to interest on refund during litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant additional FAR charges interest on refund voluntary deposit Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit

Makkella Nagaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

05 Sep 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sanjay Kumar

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition verifying the petitioner’s juvenility at the time of offence and ordered his immediate release after he had undergone imprisonment exceeding the maximum statutory period under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000.

criminal petition_allowed Significant juvenility juvenile justice juvenile in conflict with law juvenile justice act 2000

Prakash Bang v. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr.

05 Sep 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court dismissed the consumer complaint alleging vaccine-induced myositis due to insufficient evidence establishing causation and held that minimal unproven adverse reactions do not constitute deficiency in service.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant consumer protection vaccine injury myositis deficiency in service

The State of Punjab and Others v. Jaswant Singh

05 Sep 2023 · J. K. Maheshwari; K. V. Viswanathan
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that discharge of a probationer constable under Rule 12.21 of Punjab Police Rules is a simpliciter termination not requiring inquiry or hearing, and upheld the validity of the discharge order dismissing the reinstatement claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probationer discharge Punjab Police Rules 1934 Rule 12.21 PPR simpliciter termination

PACL v. Central Bureau of Investigation

05 Sep 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh · 2023INSC795

The Supreme Court dismissed omnibus bail applications in multiple criminal cases related to PACL fraud, directing accused to seek bail before respective jurisdictional courts while extending interim bail for three months.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail omnibus bail jurisdictional courts interim bail