Supreme Court of India

17,225 judgments

Year:

Rahul Ganpatrao Sable v. Laxman Maruti Jadhav

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath · 2023 INSC 608

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by holding that permanent disability entails 100% loss of income without deductions for uncertainties or personal expenses, applying correct multipliers, and awarding additional damages for attendant care, future medical expenses, and other heads.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of income multiplier method

Rahul Ganpatrao Sable v. Laxman Maruti Jadhav

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in motor accident claims by holding that permanent disability entails 100% loss of income, applying correct multipliers, disallowing certain deductions, and awarding additional heads of damages including attendant charges and loss of consortium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of income multiplier

Pradeep v. The State of Haryana

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to unreliable testimony of a minor witness, inadequate judicial examination, and non-examination of crucial witnesses, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny of child witness evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant minor witness child witness corroboration Section 118 Evidence Act

State of U.P. v. Sonu Kushwaha

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that penetrative sexual assault on a child below twelve years constitutes aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, mandating the minimum sentence under Section 6, and restored the Trial Court's conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant aggravated penetrative sexual assault Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 mandatory minimum sentence child sexual abuse

S. NARAHARI v. S.R. KUMAR

05 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court held that Special Leave Petitions against High Court review orders are not maintainable under Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC and referred the question of filing subsequent SLPs after nonspeaking dismissals to a larger bench.

civil other Significant Special Leave Petition Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC Review petition Maintainability

Abdul Ansar v. State of Kerala

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to culpable homicide under Section 308 IPC to negligence causing grievous hurt under Section 338 IPC, reducing the sentence and increasing compensation.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Section 338 IPC culpable homicide attempt negligence

Arun Dev Upadhyaya v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. & Anr.

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath · 2023 INSC 610

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions and upheld the enforceability of a foreign arbitral award against a non-signatory, affirming the limited scope of judicial review under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 44

ARUN DEV UPADHYAYA v. INTEGRATED SALES SERVICE LTD. & ANR.

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions and upheld the enforceability of a foreign arbitral award against a non-signatory, clarifying the limited scope of review and enforcement under Indian arbitration law.

civil petition_dismissed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 44

Pritinder Singh @ Lovely v. State of Punjab

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 614

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a firearm murder case due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and lack of credible extra-judicial confession and ballistic expert evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession last seen theory ballistic expert evidence

Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station v. Ashwani Kumar Dubey

05 Jul 2023 · B.V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 618

The Supreme Court set aside the NGT order for violating natural justice by not allowing appellants to object to expert Committee reports and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal principles of natural justice expert Committee report fly ash management

Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station v. Ashwani Kumar Dubey

05 Jul 2023 · B.V. Nagarathna; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2023 INSC 618
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the NGT must comply with natural justice by allowing parties to object to expert Committee reports before issuing directions and cannot delegate its adjudicatory functions to such Committees, remanding the matter for reconsideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal principles of natural justice expert Committee fly ash management

Hari Prakash Shukla & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

05 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the procedural right to be heard under the Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment applies to all claimants regardless of community, and the High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence to overturn concurrent findings of possession by lower courts, thereby setting aside the eviction order.

property appeal_allowed Significant Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment Forest Settlement Officer Section 4 Forest Act Article 226 Constitution

Hari Prakash Shukla & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

05 Jul 2023 · Krishna Murari; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court held that the procedural right to be heard under the Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment applies to all claimants irrespective of community, and the High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and disturbing concurrent findings of possession by lower courts.

property appeal_allowed Significant Banwasi Seva Ashram judgment Forest Act Section 4 Article 226 jurisdiction re-appreciation of evidence

Keshawji & Anr. v. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath · 2023 INSC 609

The Supreme Court quashed a vague notice under Sections 238 and 271 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, holding that use of wholesome water for non-domestic purposes is permitted where unfiltered water is unavailable, and notices must be addressed to occupiers, not only owners.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 Section 238 Section 271 Section 272(4)

Keshawji & Anr. v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

05 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that use of wholesome water for non-domestic purposes is permitted where unfiltered water is unavailable, and vague notices under Sections 238 and 271 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act are invalid, quashing the impugned notice against the owner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 Section 238 Section 271 Section 272(4)

Ramesh Chand v. Management of Delhi Transport Corporation

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that an employee must prove unemployment after dismissal to claim back wages, and awarded partial back wages to the appellant upon reinstatement.

labor appeal_partly_allowed Significant back wages reinstatement burden of proof unemployment

Ramesh Chand v. Management of Delhi Transport Corporation

05 Jul 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that an employee must prove unemployment after termination to claim back wages upon reinstatement and awarded partial back wages where such proof was partially established.

labor appeal_allowed Significant back wages reinstatement burden of proof unemployment

Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.

04 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court held that maize starch is taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, rejecting exemption claims and upholding the retrospective validity of the Commissioner's clarification circular.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant maize starch Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 Exemption Entry No. 8 Taxation Entry No. 61

Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited v. The State of Tamil Nadu

04 Jul 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court held that maize starch is taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act and not exempt as a millet product, affirming the validity of retrospective tax clarifications issued by the Commissioner.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant maize starch Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act exemption taxation entry

DHEERAJ SINGH v. GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

04 Jul 2023 · KRISHNA MURARI; BELA M. TRIVEDI · 2023 INSC 594

The Supreme Court held that failure of the High Court to consider cross objections in an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act vitiates the judgment and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation cross objections Order 41 Rule 22 CPC