Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

V. Senthil Balaji v. The State

07 Aug 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh · 2023 INSC 677
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that authorized officers under the PMLA have power to arrest and seek custody, that Section 41A CrPC does not apply to PMLA arrests, and that writ of Habeas Corpus is not maintainable against judicial remand orders absent illegality.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 19 PMLA Section 41A CrPC Section 167 CrPC

Dinganglung Gangmei v. Mutum Churamani Meetei

07 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 698

The Supreme Court intervened in the Manipur sectarian violence to ensure effective investigation, protection of victims, and restoration of law and order through court-appointed committees and supervisory mechanisms.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant sectarian violence Manipur Scheduled Tribes Article 32

Amudalavalasa & Anr. v. M/s Dankuni Steels Ltd. & Ors.

05 Aug 2023 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that stamp duty must be paid on the aggregate value of all assets, including plant and machinery permanently attached to land, conveyed in a single sale deed, and Registration Authorities have the power to verify true market value under the Indian Stamp Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Section 5 Indian Stamp Act Section 27 Indian Stamp Act Section 47A Indian Stamp Act

Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masajid, Varanasi v. Rakhi Singh

04 Aug 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 702

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing a non-destructive scientific survey by ASI of the Gyanvapi Mosque premises under Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC, ensuring no damage to the structure and subject to trial court scrutiny.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC scientific investigation Archaeological Survey of India Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991

Ashok Shewakramani & Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

03 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 692
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that complaints under Section 138 NI Act must contain specific averments under Section 141(1) to hold directors liable, and failure to serve statutory notice or make such averments warrants quashing of the complaint.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Section 482 CrPC

Razia Khan v. State of M.P.

03 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 667

The Supreme Court confirmed the appellant's conviction for offences against public servants but reduced the sentence considering mitigating factors, directing fines and compensation while denying probation.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 333 IPC Section 353 IPC Section 451 IPC probation

Union of India v. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association

02 Aug 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that pay scale fixation and classification of posts are primarily executive functions and set aside the Tribunal and High Court orders granting pay parity between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pay scale fixation equal pay for equal work judicial review classification of posts

Wazir Khan v. State of Uttarakhand

02 Aug 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 674

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for murdering his wife, affirming that failure to truthfully explain incriminating circumstances within his knowledge justifies invoking Section 106 of the Evidence Act and sustaining conviction on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder circumstantial evidence Section 106 Evidence Act burden of proof

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. VANDANA GUPTA

02 Aug 2023 · J.B. PARDIWALA; MANOJ MISRA · 2023 INSC 673

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of two company directors, holding that vicarious liability under the Delhi Development Act requires proof of control over the company's day-to-day affairs.

criminal appeal_dismissed Delhi Development Act, 1957 vicarious liability company directors criminal prosecution

E.S.I. Corporation v. M/s. Endocrinology and Immunology Lab

02 Aug 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that a pathological laboratory is covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act only from the 2007 Kerala Government notification date, dismissing earlier claims of coverage.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 coverage date pathological laboratory shop definition

State of Punjab v. Paramjit Singh

02 Aug 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 691

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case, holding that the disbelieved eyewitness testimony and extra-judicial confession were rightly rejected on cogent grounds.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC eyewitness testimony extra-judicial confession credibility of witnesses

Kishore Balkrishna Nand v. State of Maharashtra

02 Aug 2023 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2023 INSC 675
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a good faith complaint made to a public authority does not constitute defamation under Section 499 IPC and quashed the criminal proceedings initiated on that basis.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant defamation Section 499 IPC Section 500 IPC good faith

Avtar Singh v. State of Punjab

02 Aug 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of rape charges due to inherent improbabilities, contradictions in prosecution evidence, and acquittal of a co-accused breaking the chain of events.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape sexual assault prosecutrix credibility acquittal of co-accused

Nirmala Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh

01 Aug 2023 · B. R. Gavai; J. B. Pardiwala · 2023 INSC 662
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, recognizing grave and sudden provocation and mitigating circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC culpable homicide grave and sudden provocation

The State of Rajasthan v. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat

01 Aug 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh · 2023 INSC 661

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of amendments introducing auction and rejecting pending mining lease applications, holding no vested or fundamental right arises from mere applications and legitimate expectation cannot override public interest and statutory powers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant mining lease vested right legitimate expectation Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules

Ashok Kumar v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd

31 Jul 2023 · J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan · 2023 INSC 659

The Supreme Court held that immediate police intimation satisfies insurance policy conditions in theft cases and breach of policy by leaving keys in ignition is not fundamental, allowing claim settlement on a non-standard basis despite earlier complaint withdrawal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim theft of vehicle breach of policy conditions Condition No.1

MD. ASFAK ALAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

31 Jul 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2023 INSC 660
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's rejection of anticipatory bail in a matrimonial offence case, emphasizing procedural safeguards against arbitrary arrest and directing strict compliance with arrest protocols under Sections 41 and 41A CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Section 41 CrPC Section 41A CrPC

Gostho Behari Das v. Dipak Kumar Sanyal & Ors.

28 Jul 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 653

The Supreme Court held that suspension of a medical license is not a permissible punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and restored the appellant's license suspended during contempt proceedings.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 suspension of medical license National Medical Commission Act, 2019 professional misconduct

Sandeep Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.

28 Jul 2023 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 654
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that under Section 319 CrPC, courts must summon additional accused if prima facie evidence appears during trial, and set aside the High Court's order that prematurely assessed evidence to deny summoning.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC

Vernon Gonsalves v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

28 Jul 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 655
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed bail appeals of Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira under UAPA, holding that the materials prima facie establish their involvement in terrorist activities, justifying denial of bail under Section 43D(5).

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 43D(5) UAPA bail under UAPA prima facie true