Supreme Court of India

8,449 judgments

Year:

The Animal Welfare Board of India v. Union of India

18 May 2023 · K. M. Joseph; Ajay Rastogi; Aniruddha Bose; Hrishikesh Roy;...
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of State Amendments legalizing traditional bovine sports, holding they do not violate animal welfare laws or fundamental rights and constitute a valid exercise of legislative power.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Jallikattu Bullock Cart Race Kambala

Indian Oil Corporation v. Ajit Kumar Singh

17 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that judicial review of departmental inquiries is limited to procedural fairness and upheld disciplinary punishment for tampering with tender documents based on sufficient evidence.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review departmental inquiry disciplinary proceedings tampering

M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

17 May 2023 · KRISHNA MURARI; SANJAY KUMAR

The Supreme Court modified its earlier order to permit the appellant to unconditionally withdraw ₹38.52 crore along with accrued fixed deposit interest, setting aside the bank guarantee condition.

criminal appeal_allowed bank guarantee fixed deposit interest sale proceeds Securities Appellate Tribunal

National Insurance Company Limited v. Vedik Resorts and Hotels Private Limited

17 May 2023 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Ved
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the consumer forum’s order directing the insurer to pay compensation, ruling that the insurer failed to prove the loss fell within the policy’s exclusion clause for malicious damage caused by the insured.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance claim exclusion clause malicious damage riot and strike

Y. BALAJI v. KARTHIK DESARI

16 May 2023 · KRISHNA MURARI; V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing de novo investigation wiping out earlier probe in a job-for-cash scam, affirming the exceptional nature of such orders and upholding victims' locus standi.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant de novo investigation Section 173 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 job-for-cash scam

Jini Dhanrajgir v. Shibu Mathew

16 May 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; Dipankar Datta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the executing court's order holding third-party objections maintainable in execution proceedings, directing enquiry on merits and dismissing the appeal seeking immediate possession delivery.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Execution of decree Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections by third parties Lis pendens

Meenal Bhargava v. Naveen Sharma

16 May 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court held the appellant guilty of criminal contempt for wilfully disobeying custody orders, imposed imprisonment and fine, and directed enforcement measures to ensure compliance.

criminal sentence_modified Significant criminal contempt child custody Supreme Court orders Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Meenal Bhargava v. Naveen Sharma & Ors.

16 May 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court held the appellant guilty of contempt for willfully disobeying its orders in a child custody matter and sentenced her to six months imprisonment with a fine for the child's welfare.

criminal sentence_modified Significant contempt of court child custody willful disobedience Supreme Court orders

Meenal Bhargava v. Naveen Sharma & Ors.

16 May 2023 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court held the contemnor guilty of civil and criminal contempt for disobeying its order to return the minor child to India, imposing imprisonment and a fine while emphasizing its unrestricted power under Article 129.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court inherent jurisdiction Article 129 Constitution of India civil contempt

Miss Super Label v. U India E Yours Company Limited

16 May 2023 · A. S. Bopanna; D. Pankaj Daya

The Supreme Court held that the appellant is entitled to compensation for fire damage to machinery under the insurance policy, rejecting the insurer's contention that rusting caused the loss, and directed payment of Rs. 2.1 crore with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim fire damage surveyors report proximate cause

M/s Super Label Mfg. Co. v. New India Assurance Company Limited

16 May 2023 · A.S. Bopanna; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court held that the accidental fire and extinguishment caused damage to insured machinery, overruling the narrow rusting-time argument, and directed the insurer to pay the appellant substantial compensation beyond the surveyor's limited assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fire insurance claim surveyors report proximate cause rusting and corrosion

M/s D.N. Singh v. Commissioner of Income Tax

16 May 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy · 2023 INSC 543
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a carrier cannot be deemed owner of goods for invoking Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, setting aside additions made on alleged short delivery of bitumen.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 69A Income Tax Act ownership common carrier bitumen

ശ്രീ ശങ്കരാചാര്യ സർവ്വകലാശാല v. ഡോ. മനു

16 May 2023 · ബി.വി. നാഗരത്ന; കെ.എം. ജോസഫ്
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of a Ph.D. holder lecturer to two advance increments upon Selection Grade appointment under the 1999 Government Order, ruling that the 2001 clarificatory order does not operate retrospectively to deny vested rights.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant advance increments Ph.D. qualification Selection Grade Lecturer Government Order

M/s. D.N. Singh v. Commissioner of Income Tax

16 May 2023 · K.M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a carrier cannot be deemed the owner of goods for invoking Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, and additions on account of short delivery of bitumen were unsustainable.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 69A Income Tax Act ownership common carrier bitumen

Kallu v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

15 May 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the life conviction of the appellant for a daylight murder supported by credible eyewitness testimony and motive arising from a property dispute.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony property dispute

A. Wilson Prince v. The Nazar & Ors.

15 May 2023 · V. Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking production of a Will and probate documents destroyed lawfully decades ago, holding that relief cannot be granted on speculative claims without knowledge of the Will’s contents.

civil petition_dismissed Probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Destruction of Records Act, 1917 Will

A. Wilson Prince v. Nasar & Ors.

15 May 2023 · Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mittal

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking production of a probate copy and related documents destroyed lawfully after a long lapse, holding that no relief can be granted without proper evidence of entitlement.

civil petition_dismissed probate will Indian Succession Act, 1925 Records Disposal Act, 1917

A. WILSON PRINCE v. THE NAZAR & ORS.

15 May 2023 · V. Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking production of a Will and probate documents destroyed long ago, holding that relief cannot be granted on speculative claims without knowledge of the Will's contents.

civil petition_dismissed Indian Succession Act, 1925 probate Will Destruction of Records Act, 1917

A. Wilson Prince v. Nasar & Ors.

15 May 2023 · Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mittal · 2023 INSC 537

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of a probate, holding that destruction of original probate documents does not invalidate the legal rights conferred by the probate under the Indian Succession Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant probate will registration act destruction of documents

Afaji 184 Onus Association v. Mainam International Trading Company Private Limited

15 May 2023 · J. K. Maheshwar; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that representative consumer complaints filed by an association on behalf of multiple allottees are maintainable under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and set aside the National Commission's order rejecting such complaints.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act 2019 Representative complaint Section 35(1)(c) Consumer association