Supreme Court of India

15,091 judgments

Year:

Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U P Public Service Commission

26 Sep 2023 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the established practice of judicial recruitment in Haryana through a Selection Committee involving the High Court and Public Service Commission, dismissing the State's attempt to conduct recruitment solely via the Public Service Commission.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial recruitment Public Service Commission High Court involvement Article 234

Commanding Officer, Railway Protection Special Force, Mumbai v. Bhvanaben Dinshbhai Bhabhor

26 Sep 2023 · B. V. Nagarathna; Manoj Misra
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Railway Protection Force constable is a 'workman' under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and that claims under this Act are maintainable despite alternative remedies under the Railways Act, 1989.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Protection Force Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 workman definition Armed Forces of the Union

Ajeet Gurjar v. State of Madhya Pradesh

26 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023INSC875
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Children's Court must conduct a mandatory inquiry under Section 19(1)(i) of the Juvenile Justice Act before trying a child as an adult, and set aside the trial for non-compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act 2015 Section 19 JJ Act preliminary assessment Children's Court

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 14 v. JASJIT SINGH

26 Sep 2023 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; ARAVIND KUMAR
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that for persons other than the one searched, the six-year assessment period under Sections 153A and 153C of the Income Tax Act begins from the date the seized materials are received by their Assessing Officer, not the date of the original search.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153A Section 153C search and seizure

Rahimal Bathu & Others v. Ashiyal Beevi

26 Sep 2023 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2023INSC861
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against an order rejecting review of an appealable decree, and the aggrieved party must file an appeal instead.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction review application appealable decree

Sabbir v. Anjuman

22 Sep 2023 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah

The Supreme Court held that a suit for specific performance filed after an inordinate delay without showing readiness and willingness is barred by limitation and dismissed the respondents' suit, restoring the First Appellate Court's decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Agreement to Sell Specific Performance Limitation Act Readiness and Willingness

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat v. Kishor Sharad Borawake

22 Sep 2023 · B. R. Gavai; S. V. N. Bhatti
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of conditions requiring landowners to surrender amenity space to the Municipal Council under a Government Notification, dismissing delayed challenges by landowners and plot holders.

property appeal_allowed Significant Government Notification 18th August 2004 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Development Control Regulations amenity space

Balwinder Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau; Satnam Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau

22 Sep 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Hima Kohli; Prashant Kumar Mishra
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court overruled prior precedents to hold that confessional statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act before NCB officers are inadmissible, acquitting Balwinder Singh while upholding Satnam Singh's conviction based on independent evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed (Balwinder Singh), appeal_dismissed (Satnam Singh) Significant NDPS Act Section 67 NDPS Act Confessional statement admissibility Narcotics Control Bureau

Sri Pubi Lombi v. State of Arunachal Pradesh

22 Sep 2023 · J. K. Maheshwari; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 200
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that judicial interference in government transfer orders is limited to cases of malafide or statutory violation and that transfers based on MLA recommendations do not per se vitiate such orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transfer order judicial review malafide administrative discretion

4a48b89c004b44c22994205589aac635f890360d6ebc9eade8de504e73ce5983

21 Sep 2023 · 2023 INSC 267

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for abduction, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation, affirming that credible victim testimony supported by corroboration suffices to prove the offences under IPC Sections 366, 342, and 506.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abduction wrongful confinement criminal intimidation Section 366 IPC

JOSEPH v. THE STATE OF KERALA

21 Sep 2023 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023INSC843
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a life convict who has served over 26 years and earned remission is entitled to premature release, and the State’s blanket policy excluding convicts involved in murder of women from remission is arbitrary and unsustainable.

criminal petition_allowed Significant premature release remission life imprisonment executive discretion

First Global Stockbroking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Anil Rishiraj & Anr.

21 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that offences under the repealed FERA continue to be governed by FERA provisions within the two-year sunset period under FEMA, validating complaints filed by authorised Enforcement Officers during this period.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Repeal and saving provisions Enforcement Officer authority

Batliboi Environmental Engineers Limited v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Another

21 Sep 2023 · Sanjiv Khanna; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s setting aside of an arbitral award for lack of reasoned analysis and irrational computation of damages, affirming the scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral award Section 31 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Damages computation

Suresh Lataruji Ramteke v. Sumanbai Pandurang Petkar

21 Sep 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in reversing concurrent findings of fact without proper hearing and perusal of trial records under Section 100 CPC, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Concurrent Findings of Fact

CELIR LLP v. BAFNA MOTORS (MUMBAI) PVT. LTD. & ORS.

21 Sep 2023 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the mortgagor's right of redemption under Section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act survives until registration of the sale certificate under the SARFAESI Act, dismissing the auction purchaser's appeal and upholding the High Court's order permitting redemption after auction finality.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 13(8) right of redemption Transfer of Property Act 1882

Rajesh & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

21 Sep 2023 · B.R. Gavai; J.B. Pardiwala; Sanjay Kumar

The Supreme Court acquitted three accused in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and procedural lapses in police investigation, setting aside death sentences and other convictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence confession admissibility Section 26 Indian Evidence Act Section 27 Indian Evidence Act

Sunil v. State of NCT of Delhi

21 Sep 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy; Manoj Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for attempt to murder under Section 307/34 IPC but set aside murder convictions under Section 302 IPC due to lack of common intention, and held non-compliance with Section 313 CrPC does not vitiate trial absent prejudice.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention exhortation Section 302 IPC

Sudesh Kumar Goyal v. State of Haryana & Ors.

21 Sep 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy; Pankaj Mithal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the non-appointment of the 14th candidate in judicial service recruitment, ruling no indefeasible right arises from selection and that vacancies must be filled bona fide without arbitrariness.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant direct recruitment judicial service arbitrariness indefeasible right

MEENA PRADHAN v. KAMLA PRADHAN

21 Sep 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a Will executed in compliance with statutory formalities, dismissing challenges based on alleged forgery, mental incapacity, and bigamy.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will validity Indian Succession Act 1925 Section 63 Section 68 Indian Evidence Act

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

21 Sep 2023 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of municipal terminal tax levies in Scheduled Areas in the absence of any exemption notification by the Governor under the Fifth Schedule.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Areas Fifth Schedule Municipalities Terminal Tax