Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

M/S. KOZYFLEX MATTRESSES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

20 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 234
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a company insured under a fire insurance policy is a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act and must be given a fair opportunity to rebut investigation reports before claim repudiation, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act insurance claim repudiation fraudulent claim natural justice

Apoorva Arora & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

19 Mar 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 223

The Supreme Court held that vulgar language and profanities in a web-series do not constitute obscenity or sexually explicit material under Sections 67 and 67A of the IT Act, quashing the FIR against the creators.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant obscenity Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 67 IT Act Section 67A IT Act

Shiv Prasad Semwal v. State of Uttarakhand

19 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 220

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR alleging offences under Sections 153A and 504 IPC, holding that the publication did not promote enmity between groups and the allegations failed to disclose any cognizable offence, thus amounting to abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 153A IPC Section 504 IPC quashing of FIR abuse of process of law

NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED v. ZILLION INFRAPROJECTS PVT.LTD

19 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 218
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a general reference to terms and conditions containing an arbitration clause does not incorporate that clause into a contract absent specific intention, and upheld exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts as per the Letter of Intent, setting aside the appointment of an arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause incorporation Section 11(6) Arbitration Act Letter of Intent jurisdiction clause

Puneet Sabharwal v. CBI

19 Mar 2024 · Vikram Nath; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 221
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that income tax orders are not conclusive proof of lawful income sources and upheld framing of charges for disproportionate assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, dismissing appellants' plea for discharge based on income tax proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal framing of charges

MS. X v. MR. A

18 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Rajesh Bindal; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 216
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings where the prosecution failed to prima facie establish offences and the promise of marriage did not vitiate consent under Section 375 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings promise of marriage consent vitiated

Ekene Godwin v. State of Tamil Nadu

18 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 229
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed bail and ordered a de novo trial after holding that recording only examination-in-chief without cross-examination and without legal aid counsel violates fair trial rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant legal aid examination-in-chief cross-examination fair trial

Periyasamy v. The State

18 Mar 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 212
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside murder convictions due to unreliable interested witnesses, investigative lapses, and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant conviction interested witnesses private defence police investigation

M. Radheshyamlal v. V Sandhya

18 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 214
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeals, holding that he failed to prove adverse possession and confirming defendants' title under a valid settlement deed, while granting extended time to vacate the property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant adverse possession settlement deed probate letters of administration

NAVAS @ MULANAVAS v. STATE OF KERALA

18 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 215

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for quadruple murder based on circumstantial evidence and affirmed the High Court's commutation of the death sentence to life imprisonment without remission for 30 years, applying the Swamy Shraddananda sentencing principles.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder house trespass attempt to commit suicide

Somnath v. State of Maharashtra

18 Mar 2024 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 232

The Supreme Court upheld compensation for custodial abuse by a police officer but declined criminal prosecution due to limitation and retirement, reaffirming strict safeguards for detainees.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant custodial abuse police misconduct compensation personal liberty

Rohtas & Anr. v. State of Haryana; Bijender v. State of Haryana

15 Mar 2024 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC based on individual participation and common intention despite acquittal of some accused under Section 149 IPC, and set aside the conviction under Section 148 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 148 IPC Section 149 IPC Section 34 IPC

M/s Global Technologies and Research v. Principal Commissioner of Customs

15 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 204

The Supreme Court upheld the CESTAT's order rejecting the appellant's undervaluation claim and dismissed the appeal, holding that the Committee of Commissioners' review was timely and the goods were identical or similar for customs valuation purposes.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 129A Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 transaction value

Susela Padmavathy Amma v. M/S Bharti Airtel Limited

15 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 206

The Supreme Court held that a director cannot be held liable under Section 141 NI Act without specific averments showing control and responsibility over the company's business, and quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant director for cheque bounce offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Director liability

Union of India v. Raj Rahul Garg

15 Mar 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 219

The Supreme Court held that a High Court Judge’s pension must be computed by blending her entire judicial service, disregarding administrative breaks, to avoid discrimination and uphold judicial independence.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant pension computation High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 break in service judicial service

Jafar v. State of Kerala

15 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 207
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a dacoity case due to unreliable identification evidence and insufficient recovery, emphasizing the necessity of a proper identification parade.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Identification parade Dacoity Section 397 IPC Section 395 IPC

Association of Democratic Reforms v. Union of India

15 Mar 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Sanjiv Khanna; B R Gavai; J B Pard... · 2024 INSC 209

The Supreme Court directed the digitization and public uploading of electoral bond data by the Election Commission and issued notice to SBI for disclosure of bond details, reinforcing transparency obligations under the Constitution Bench judgment.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Election Commission of India electoral bonds transparency data disclosure

Rakesh Ranjan Shrivastava v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.

15 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 205
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the grant of interim compensation under Section 143A(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act is discretionary and not mandatory, requiring courts to apply mind to relevant factors before directing payment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 143A Negotiable Instruments Act interim compensation discretionary power Section 138 cheque dishonour

Samaj Parivartana Samudaya v. State of Karnataka

14 Mar 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; M. M. Sundresh; Bela M. Trivedi · 2024 INSC 267

The Supreme Court upheld regulatory measures including production ceilings, mandatory rehabilitation plans, and a 10% levy on mining proceeds to restore environmental damage from illegal mining in Karnataka's Bellary, Chitradurga, and Tumkur districts.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant illegal mining environmental degradation production ceiling Reclamation and Rehabilitation Plans

Srikant Upadhyay v. State of Bihar

14 Mar 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 202

The Supreme Court held that a person declared absconding under Section 82 CrPC is not entitled to anticipatory bail and pendency of bail application without interim protection does not bar issuance of proclamation or further proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 82 CrPC proclamation non-bailable warrant