Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. v. Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj & Ors.

15 Dec 2023 · Aniruddha Bose; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2023 INSC 1081

The Supreme Court upheld the referral of a property dispute to arbitration under broad arbitration clauses in foundational agreements, emphasizing limited judicial intervention and the competence of arbitral tribunals to decide jurisdictional issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 8 Arbitration Act non-arbitrability fraud allegation

Union of India v. Air Commodore NK Sharma

14 Dec 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1074
Cites 4 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Armed Forces Tribunal cannot direct the Government to formulate promotion policy or extend service beyond superannuation, quashing the Tribunal's order favoring the Respondent's promotion claim.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 promotion policy service matters policy formulation

Afjal Ansari v. State of UP

14 Dec 2023 · Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 1071
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that suspension of conviction under Section 389(1) CrPC is an exception but warranted in cases causing irreversible consequences like disqualification, and thus suspended the appellant’s conviction subject to conditions pending appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 389(1) CrPC suspension of conviction disqualification Representation of the People Act, 1951

State of Haryana v. Dinesh Singh

14 Dec 2023 · M. M. Sundresh; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 1070

The Supreme Court held that eligibility regarding disciplinary proceedings for Haryana Civil Service recruitment must be assessed as on the date of consideration, not a fixed earlier cut-off date, and since disciplinary action was contemplated against the candidate then, he was rightly held ineligible.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Haryana Civil Service Rules 2008 Register A-1 Eligibility criteria Disciplinary proceedings

Manik Hiru Jhangiani v. State of M.P.

14 Dec 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1078

The Supreme Court held that where FSSA provisions on misbranding are in force, prosecution under the repealed PFA is barred due to the overriding effect clause, and only penalty under FSSA can be imposed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 misbranding overriding effect

Chhote Lal v. Rohtash & Ors.

14 Dec 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1072

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case, emphasizing that conviction requires proof beyond reasonable doubt and that the testimony of an interested eyewitness must be scrutinized with caution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness testimony benefit of doubt circumstantial evidence conviction

U.P. Singh v. Punjab National Bank

14 Dec 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1077

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of deemed voluntary retirement under Clause XVI of the Bipartite Agreement where the employee failed to join duty after suspension and transfer, dismissing his appeal against the High Court's order.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant deemed voluntary retirement Clause XVI Bipartite Agreement absence without leave disciplinary authority

MOHAMMED ABDUL WAHID v. NILOFER

14 Dec 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1075

The Supreme Court held that a party to a suit is not distinct from a witness for purposes of producing documents during cross-examination, allowing such production without prior leave under the CPC, thereby overruling the High Court's contrary view.

civil appeal_allowed Significant party to suit witness cross-examination production of documents

Shakti Yezdani & Anr v. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar & Ors

14 Dec 2023 · Hrishikesh Roy; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1076

The Supreme Court held that nomination under the Companies Act and Depositories Act does not confer absolute ownership to nominees and does not override testamentary or intestate succession laws.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant nomination Companies Act, 1956 Section 109A Section 109B

Orzeku v. VihykFkhZ

13 Dec 2023 · 2023 INSC 371

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused due to lack of direct evidence and procedural lapses, holding that conviction under Sections 302 and 149 IPC requires proof beyond reasonable doubt and proper identification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC circumstantial evidence common intention

Orzeku v. VihykFkhZ

13 Dec 2023 · 2016 (7) SCC 1

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction and life sentence of a petitioner as a member of an unlawful assembly under Sections 302 and 149 IPC, affirming liability based on common intention and participation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly common intention Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC

IN RE: INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND THE INDIAN STAMP ACT 1899

13 Dec 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Sanjiv Khanna · 2023 INSC 1066
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that non-payment of stamp duty renders arbitration agreements inadmissible but not void, requiring courts to examine stamping compliance at the referral stage while harmonizing arbitration law with fiscal statutes.

arbitration other Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Indian Contract Act, 1872 Stamp duty

P.C. Modi v. Jawaharlal Nehru Vishwa Vidyalaya and Another

13 Dec 2023 · Hima Kohli; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1067

The Supreme Court held that a Sports Officer/PTI at Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya qualifies as a "teacher" entitled to retire at 62 years, reversing the High Court's contrary decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant teacher definition physical training instructor sports officer retirement age

Maheshwari Yadav & Anr. v. The State of Bihar

13 Dec 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2023 INSC 1068

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of appellants under Sections 302 and 325 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that common intention and credible eyewitness testimony suffice to sustain vicarious liability even without prior conspiracy.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention vicarious liability Section 302 IPC

c92cbb55d0cfb21154b9e53c7b180120acd829bdb0cc87e2089d401ac9bbc407

12 Dec 2023 · vHk; ,l- vksd; jkts’k fcany · 2023 INSC 363

The Supreme Court held that courts should not ordinarily compel prosecution under Section 482 CrPC unless there is clear abuse of process or failure of justice, upholding police discretion in criminal investigations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC judicial interference police discretion compelling prosecution

Rajpal v. State of Rajasthan

12 Dec 2023 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2023 INSC 1089

The Supreme Court dismissed the bail appeal as withdrawn but directed High Courts to list all bail applications arising from the same FIR before the same Judge to ensure consistency and avoid conflicting orders.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail parity co-accused conflicting orders

Prafful Shukla and Others v. Government of Madhya Pradesh

12 Dec 2023 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 1061

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's merger of Adult Education Department staff into the Education Department as a valid policy decision not subject to judicial interference.

civil appeal_dismissed merger of cadres policy decision judicial interference seniority

Sekaran v. The State of Tamil Nadu

12 Dec 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Dipankar Datta; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 1062
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of culpable homicide charges due to unreliable prosecution evidence, unexplained delay in FIR, and non-examination of key witnesses, emphasizing the benefit of doubt principle.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder delay in FIR non-examination of witnesses benefit of doubt

In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution

11 Dec 2023 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sanjiv Khanna;... · 2023 INSC 1058
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into Union Territories through Presidential Orders and Parliamentary legislation under Article 356.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Landmark Article 370 Article 356 President's Rule Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act

Amanat Ali v. State of Karnataka and others

11 Dec 2023 · B. R. Gavai; Aravind Kumar · 2023 INSC 1060

The Supreme Court allowed consolidation of multiple FIRs registered within Madhya Pradesh for trial before a single court under Article 142, while rejecting transfer of FIRs from other states.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consolidation of FIRs Article 142 Constitution of India multiplicity of proceedings transfer of criminal cases