Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Travancore Devaswom Board v. Ayyappa Spices

06 Mar 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 183

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition filed by an interested tender participant disguised as public interest litigation is not maintainable and set aside the High Court's orders restraining distribution of Aravana Prasadam and ordering prosecution of the temple board.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant public interest litigation judicial review tender process food safety

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

06 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 178

The Supreme Court held that Tiger Safaris within tiger reserves must comply with statutory conservation mandates, restrained illegal constructions in Corbett Tiger Reserve, and emphasized ecological protection and restoration.

environmental other Significant Tiger Reserve Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 Tiger Safari National Tiger Conservation Authority

M/S SHAH ENTERPRISES THR. PADMABEN MANSUKHBHAI MODI v. VAIJAYANTIBEN RANJITSINGH SAWANT

06 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Rajesh Bindal; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 182

The Supreme Court held that filing a civil suit contrary to a consent decree to which the petitioner was not a party does not constitute contempt of court and dismissed the contempt appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contempt of court consent decree civil suit res judicata

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Chandra Shekhar

05 Mar 2024 · Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 210

The Supreme Court upheld quashing of land acquisition for non-compliance with statutory notice requirements and directed compensation under the 2013 Act for acquisition pending as of 2014.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 notice under Section 28 and 29 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013

Prabhat Kumar Mishra v. The State of U.P. & Anr.

05 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 172
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant for abetment of suicide and SC/ST Act offences, holding that the allegations did not disclose the essential ingredients of the offences and constituted abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act Section 482 CrPC

Naeem v. State of Uttar Pradesh

05 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 169
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the principal accused based on a reliable dying declaration but acquitted the co-accused for lack of specific incriminating evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC conviction

Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited v. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd.

05 Mar 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 201

The Supreme Court held that the statutory 120-day payment limit under the Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993, applies to payments due after its 1998 amendment, overriding longer contractual payment terms, and dismissed the appeal challenging the setting aside of an arbitral award on interest claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993 Section 3 proviso appointed day day of acceptance

Telangana Residential Educational Institutions Recruitment Board v. Saluvadi Sumalatha

05 Mar 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; M. M. Sundresh · 2024 INSC 176
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court upheld the recruitment of respondent No. 2, affirming adherence to the 30:70 local reservation ratio and limiting judicial interference in selection committee decisions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant local reservation 30:70 ratio selection committee judicial interference

Suman L. Shah v. The Custodian

05 Mar 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 170

The Supreme Court held that the Custodian failed to prove the appellants' liability for repayment of alleged debts to benami companies under the Special Court Act, quashing recovery orders due to improper burden shifting and unproved evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Special Court Act 1992 burden of proof benami companies recovery of debt

Vinod Katara v. State of U.P.

05 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 171
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition claiming juvenility, holding that reliable school records established the petitioner was a major at the time of the murder, and medical ossification tests are unreliable beyond 25 years of age.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant juvenility age determination ossification test family register

Sangam Milk Producer Company Ltd. v. The Agricultural Market Committee & Ors.

05 Mar 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 174

The Supreme Court upheld that "ghee" is a product of livestock under the Andhra Pradesh Markets Act, validated the 1994 notification issued without Section 3 procedure, and held producers liable for retrospective market fees.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant ghee product of livestock Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Produce and Livestock Markets Act, 1966 Section 3 notification

Rajesh Monga v. Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited & Ors.

04 Mar 2024 · A.S. Bopanna; M.M. Sundresh · 2024 INSC 162

The Supreme Court held that a borrower is bound by the adjustable interest rate terms in a duly executed loan agreement linked to the lender's retail prime lending rate, and pre-contractual representations do not override such contractual terms.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant adjustable rate of interest loan agreement pre-contractual representations consumer protection

Murari Lal Chhari & Ors. v. Munishwar Singh Tomar & Anr.

04 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 168

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against SAF officers for alleged land trespass, holding that prosecution without sanction under Section 197 CrPC and after dismissal of a related Contempt Petition was an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC sanction to prosecute abuse of process of law public servant prosecution

Thangam and Another v. Navamani Ammal

04 Mar 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 164

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a registered Will executed by a mentally competent testator, emphasizing the necessity of specific para-wise denials in pleadings and dismissing the appeal challenging the Will's genuineness.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will genuineness Testator capacity Registered Will Order VIII CPC

Avitel Post Studioz Limited & Ors v. HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited

04 Mar 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 242
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, holding that allegations of arbitral bias must meet a high international standard and be raised timely in the seat jurisdiction, and that enforcement can only be refused for violations of the forum state's most basic notions of morality and justice.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant foreign arbitral award enforcement Section 48 Arbitration Act arbitral bias public policy

Shazia Aman Khan v. The State of Orissa

04 Mar 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 163

The Supreme Court held that the welfare and wishes of a 14-year-old child are paramount in custody disputes, allowing custody to remain with the appellants who have cared for her since infancy, overruling the biological father's claim.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody of minor welfare of child parens patriae jurisdiction Mohammedan law

Srinivas Raghavendrarao Desai v. V. Kumar Vamanrao @ Alok and Ors.

04 Mar 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 165

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's reliance on an unpleaded 1965 partition, upheld the 1984 partition, and validated the sale deed of disputed property by defendant No. 7 to defendant No. 9.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit family property pleadings and evidence interim order

Sita Soren v. Union of India

04 Mar 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A.S. Bopanna; M.M. Sundresh; Pamid... · 2024 INSC 161
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court referred to a larger bench the question of whether parliamentary privilege under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) protects legislators from criminal prosecution for bribery, doubting the correctness of the majority view in PV Narasimha Rao.

constitutional other Significant parliamentary privilege Article 105(2) Article 194(2) bribery

ANIL MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P.

01 Mar 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 189

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC based on a settlement agreement to which the original complainant and injured victim is not a party and has objected.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR settlement agreement injured victim

Vinayak Purshottam Dube (Deceased) v. Jayashree Padamkar Bhat

01 Mar 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 159

Legal representatives of a deceased sole proprietor are liable to satisfy monetary dues from the estate but are not bound to perform personal contractual obligations requiring the deceased's skills or expertise.

civil appeal_allowed Significant legal representatives liability sole proprietorship personal contractual obligations Development Agreement