Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Container Corporation of India Ltd. v. Ajay Khera & Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 31
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed phased replacement of heavy-duty diesel vehicles with cleaner BS-VI vehicles at the Tughlakabad ICD and mandated optimal utilization of ICDs around Delhi to balance pollution control with logistical feasibility, emphasizing the fundamental right to a pollution-free environment for all citizens.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Inland Container Depot Air Pollution Article 21 National Green Tribunal

Dinesh Gupta v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

11 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 32
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court quashed a criminal FIR filed with false jurisdictional facts to convert a civil-commercial dispute into a criminal case, holding it an abuse of process and imposed heavy costs on the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. malicious prosecution abuse of process territorial jurisdiction

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Yogendera Mohan Sengupta

11 Jan 2024 · B.R. Gavai; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 30
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the National Green Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by directing the State on legislative functions under the Town & Country Planning Act, setting aside NGT orders restricting Shimla's development plan and affirming the State's exclusive legislative authority in town planning.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Town & Country Planning Act Development Plan National Green Tribunal Jurisdiction

Dr. Balbir Singh Bhandari v. The State of Uttarakhand

10 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 29
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's cancellation of a pay scale order and allowed recovery of amounts paid to Ayurvedic Medical Officers, emphasizing the need for Cabinet approval and consistency with Finance Department orders.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant personal pay scale promotional pay scale regularisation recovery of benefits

Alagammal and Ors. v. Ganesan and Anr.

10 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 28
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that failure to pay the balance consideration within the stipulated time and absence of readiness and willingness bars suit for specific performance, especially where a prior sale deed exists, and allowed the appeal restoring the trial court's dismissal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant agreement of sale specific performance time essence of contract readiness and willingness

Raju and Another v. State of Uttarakhand

10 Jan 2024 · Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 633

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction under Section 307 IPC due to contradictions and absence of key witnesses, restoring the Trial Court's acquittal of the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Benefit of doubt Contradictory evidence

HDFC BANK LIMITED v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

10 Jan 2024 · Manoj Misra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 759

The Supreme Court held that the complaint contained sufficient averments to hold a director vicariously liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the High Court’s quashment of proceedings against her.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability director liability dishonour of cheque

Mohd. Julfukar v. State of Uttarakhand

09 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 38

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 376 and 506 IPC where the complainant and accused had amicably settled their dispute and the complainant no longer wished to prosecute.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of criminal proceedings Section 376 IPC consent amicable settlement

Suresh Garodia v. State of Assam

09 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 39
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings initiated after a 34-year delay, holding them to be an abuse of process motivated by a property dispute and emphasizing the need for reasons when rejecting police final reports.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings delay in lodging FIR abuse of process of law

K.P. Mozika v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

09 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 27
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that contracts for hiring vehicles to ONGC and IOCL did not transfer the right to use goods and thus were not sales liable to VAT or sales tax but contracts for services liable to service tax.

tax appeal_allowed Significant transfer of right to use goods Clause 29A(d) Article 366 Assam VAT Act Sales Tax Act

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. v. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited

08 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 23

The Supreme Court held that under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, tariff adoption requires regulatory scrutiny including market alignment, and only bidders issued Letters of Intent qualify as successful bidders entitled to supply power, setting aside the High Court's order directing procurement from a non-successful bidder.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 63 tariff adoption competitive bidding

ANJUM ARA v. STATE OF BIHAR

08 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 40

The Supreme Court held that disqualification based on a guideline clause already declared unconstitutional is unsustainable and ordered reinstatement of the appellant with continuity in service.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Anganwari Sevika Guidelines 2011 Clause 4.[9] Articles 14 and 16 disqualification

Pradeep Kumar v. State of Haryana

05 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 21
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC extrajudicial confession

Gurdev Singh Bhalla v. State of Punjab & Ors.

05 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 22

The Supreme Court upheld the summoning of police officials under Section 319 Cr.P.C. despite absence of sanction, holding that prima facie evidence justified their trial for corruption-related offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning of accused Prevention of Corruption Act sanction prima facie evidence

Jitendra Kumar Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 20

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a murder case by holding that the dying declaration was unreliable and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC

State of Punjab v. Gurpreet Singh

05 Jan 2024 · Surya Kant; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 154
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's acquittal of the main accused in a murder case, restoring his conviction based on reliable eyewitness testimony, motive, and recovery of weapon, while upholding acquittal of co-accused due to lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Article 136 Constitution of India Section 302 IPC Acquittal Eyewitness testimony

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Darshan Lal Bohra

05 Jan 2024 · Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 508

The Supreme Court held that only objectors who filed written objections under Section 5A have a right to hearing, acceptance of compensation bars challenge, and substantial compliance with Section 5A suffices to uphold land acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 5A hearing Objections to land acquisition Acceptance of compensation

CBI BS AND FC Mumbai v. Manojdev Gokulchand Seksaria and Anr.

05 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 618

The Supreme Court set aside the Bombay High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings related to IPO fraud, holding that SEBI consent does not bar criminal trial and remanded the matter for hearing by a Division Bench.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of criminal proceedings SEBI consent order High Court Rules jurisdiction Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Sarfaraz Alam v. Union of India

04 Jan 2024 · M. M. Sundresh; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 18

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a COFEPOSA detention order, holding that documented refusal by the detenue to receive grounds of detention does not vitiate the order if authorities comply with Article 22(5) procedural safeguards.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) grounds of detention COFEPOSA Act

Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab

04 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 19

The Supreme Court overturned the murder conviction of Darshan Singh due to failure of prosecution to prove his presence at the crime scene beyond reasonable doubt and accepted the possibility of suicide, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstances in circumstantial evidence cases.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act Section 313 CrPC