Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Karikho Kri v. Nuney Tayang

09 Apr 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 289
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order invalidating Karikho Kri's election, holding that non-disclosure of vehicles sold or gifted prior to nomination and non-submission of no dues certificates without outstanding dues do not amount to corrupt practice or substantial defects warranting election annulment.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Representation of the People Act, 1951 Election petition Improper acceptance of nomination Corrupt practice

Maneesha Yadav and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

09 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 322

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings against appellants lacking specific material implicating them must be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process, even after charge-sheet filing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR abuse of process prima facie case

THE VVF LTD. EMPLOYEES UNION v. M/S. VVF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

09 Apr 2024 · ANIRUDDHA BOSE; SANJAY KUMAR · 2024 INSC 302

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence in a wage revision dispute and remanded the matter to the Industrial Tribunal for fresh consideration applying the industry-cum-region test and considering the employer's financial capacity.

labor remanded Significant wage revision industrial dispute judicial review Article 226

Najmunisha v. State of Gujarat

09 Apr 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 290

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants by holding that statements under Section 67 NDPS Act are inadmissible and the search of their house violated mandatory statutory safeguards under Sections 41 and 42 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act 1985 Section 67 NDPS Section 41 NDPS Section 42 NDPS

MADHAVAN v. THIYYURKUNNATH MEETHAL

09 Apr 2024 · ANIRUDDHA BOSE; SUDHANSHU DHULIA · 2024 INSC 287

The Supreme Court held that a widow loses her rights in her deceased husband's property upon remarriage under Section 2 of the Hindu Widow's Remarriage Act, 1856, and thus the plaintiff son from the second marriage cannot claim partition of the property.

property appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Widow's Remarriage Act, 1856 Section 2 partition suit lease deed

Khengarbhai Lakhabhai Dambhala v. State of Gujarat

08 Apr 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 285

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant must approach the criminal court under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for custody of a vehicle seized for carrying liquor exceeding prescribed limits, and cannot bypass this procedure by directly invoking the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 451 CrPC seizure and confiscation release of seized vehicle

K.B. Lal v. Gyanendra Pratap

08 Apr 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 281

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a belated application to recall an ex-parte order due to inordinate delay without sufficient cause, affirming the necessity of reasonable explanation for condonation of delay under Order IX, Rule 7 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order IX Rule 7 CPC condonation of delay sufficient cause ex-parte order

Vitthalrao Marotirao Navkhare v. Nanibai

08 Apr 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 283

The Supreme Court upheld the finding of a joint family business and joint ownership of properties, setting aside a review order based on a misreading of the appellate judgment, and allowed the appellant's suit for partition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Joint Hindu Family Joint family business Partition suit Section 32(3) Indian Evidence Act

Yash Tuteja & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 301
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that offences not listed as scheduled offences under the PMLA cannot sustain a complaint under the Act and quashed the complaint accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 scheduled offence Section 3 PMLA Section 44(1)(b) PMLA

Pathapati Subba Reddy v. Special Deputy Collector (LA)

08 Apr 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 286
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a 5659-day delay in filing an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing strict enforcement of limitation laws and discretionary denial of delay condonation in absence of sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 3 Limitation Act Section 5 Limitation Act Land Acquisition Act

Vipin Sahni v. Central Bureau of Investigation

08 Apr 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 284

The Supreme Court restored the discharge of appellants from cheating and criminal conspiracy charges, holding that no dishonest inducement of AICTE was proved and the CBI improperly invoked inherent powers to challenge the discharge.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 120B IPC Cheating Criminal conspiracy

Raj Reddy Kallem v. State of Haryana & Anr.

08 Apr 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2024 INSC 347
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings and appeals under Section 138 NI Act and related IPC offences after full repayment and interest by the appellant, despite complainant's refusal to compound, exercising powers under Article 142 for complete justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Compounding of offences Consent of complainant Quashing of criminal proceedings

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Virendra Bahadur Katheria

06 Apr 2024 · Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 524

The Supreme Court held that the State’s 2011 Order implementing revised pay scales for SDI/ABSA and DBSA subsumed earlier High Court orders under the doctrine of merger, upheld the pay scales notionally from 2006 and actually from 2008, disallowed recovery of excess payments from retirees, and dismissed the State’s delayed intra-court appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay scale anomaly doctrine of merger res judicata intra-court appeal

OMSAIRAM STEELS & ALLOYS PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BBSR

06 Apr 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 520

The Supreme Court allowed a fresh e-auction after holding that a bona fide inadvertent bidding error, promptly reported and unrectifiable by the system, warrants equitable relief rather than enforcement of an exorbitant mistaken bid.

civil appeal_allowed Significant e-auction bona fide mistake bid security Mineral Auction Rules, 2015

MAYA GOPINATHAN v. ANOOP S.B.

05 Apr 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 334
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that in matrimonial disputes, misappropriation of stridhan jewellery must be proved on a balance of probabilities and restored the Family Court's decree awarding compensation to the wife.

family appeal_allowed Significant stridhan property misappropriation standard of proof preponderance of probabilities

M/s. Jaiprakash Industries Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

05 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 273

The Supreme Court held that amalgamation of lessee companies amounts to transfer under the lease deed, attracting liability to pay unearned increase value to the lessor.

property appeal_dismissed Significant amalgamation unearned increase value perpetual lease deed transfer of property

Chandan v. The State (Delhi Admn.)

05 Apr 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 271

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative forensic evidence despite absence of motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony absence of motive

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shilpa Jain & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 278

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of an FIR alleging fraudulent property transactions, holding that title disputes are civil matters but criminal allegations of forgery and conspiracy warrant investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR title dispute civil vs criminal dispute

Aqeel Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another

05 Apr 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 268
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders for accused in a murder case, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny in serious offences and cancelling bail granted without proper consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder Section 302 IPC High Court bail orders

ANNAPURNA B. UPPIN & ORS. v. MALSIDDAPPA & ANR.

05 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 276
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a consumer complaint is not maintainable for a commercial dispute involving a partnership firm where the complainant was a partner, and legal heirs of a deceased partner are not liable for firm debts after dissolution.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Partnership firm Registered partnership deed Legal heirs liability