Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

22 Mar 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 246
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court dismissed interim relief against the 2023 Act's amendment to the Election Commissioners' selection process, emphasizing judicial restraint and procedural concerns without interfering before final adjudication.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Election Commission of India Section 7(1) 2023 Act Selection Committee Chief Justice of India

M/S. DIVGI METAL WARES LTD. v. M/S. DIVGI METAL WARES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION

21 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 237

The Supreme Court held that employer's contractual right to transfer employees between company establishments prevails over Standing Orders restricting transfers within the same unit, setting aside the High Court's order invalidating such transfers.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 transfer of employees standing orders terms of appointment

Saree Sansar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

21 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 240

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi Government's levy of 12% sales tax on silk fabric, ruling that deletion from declared goods list and nil ADE duty permit such taxation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957 Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 sales tax on silk fabric

Bina Basak v. Sri Bipul Kanti Basak

21 Mar 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 279

The Supreme Court held that a government-allotted property under a rehabilitation scheme belongs to the entire refugee family, not exclusively to one member, and dismissed the suit filed on a canceled lease deed basis.

civil appeal_allowed Significant property allotment rehabilitation scheme joint family ownership lease deed cancellation

M K Ranjitsinh v. Union of India

21 Mar 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 280

The Supreme Court balanced the conservation of the critically endangered Great Indian Bustard with India's renewable energy commitments, modifying its earlier order to relax blanket undergrounding of transmission lines as technically and economically unfeasible.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Great Indian Bustard endangered species conservation overhead transmission lines underground power cables

Orissa State Financial Corporation v. Sukanti Mohapatra

21 Mar 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 256

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful sale of mortgaged property under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, rejecting the High Court's interference and clarifying the Corporation's commercial discretion in loan recovery.

civil appeal_allowed Significant State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Section 29 One Time Settlement loan default

UNION OF INDIA v. M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD

21 Mar 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 243

The Supreme Court held that refund claims for illegally realized railway freight are not barred by the six-month notice requirement under Section 106(3) of the Railways Act, 1989, distinguishing illegal charges from overcharges.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Railways Act 1989 Section 106 overcharge illegal charge

Raghunatha and Another v. State of Karnataka

21 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 238

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory motive recovery of weapon

Nenavath Bujji v. The State of Telangana

21 Mar 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 239

The Supreme Court quashed the preventive detention order against the appellants, holding that mere registration of offences without evidence of impact on public order does not justify detention under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention public order goonda habitual offender

Pankaj Singh v. State of Haryana

21 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 254
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges, holding that the prosecution failed to prove lack of consent beyond reasonable doubt and that statutory presumptions under Section 114A Evidence Act did not apply without proper charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC rape Section 114A Evidence Act consent

Noble M. Paikada v. Union of India

21 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 241

The Supreme Court struck down the exemption from prior environmental clearance for extraction of ordinary earth for linear projects as arbitrary and procedurally invalid, reinforcing the need for safeguards and public participation under environmental laws.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Rule 5 Environment (Protection) Rules Article 14 Constitution

A.M. Mohan v. The State

20 Mar 2024 · B.R. Gavai; Rajesh Bindal; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 233
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and charge-sheet against the appellant for lack of prima facie case of cheating under Section 420 IPC, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 415 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR

M/S. KOZYFLEX MATTRESSES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

20 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 234
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a company insured under a fire insurance policy is a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act and must be given a fair opportunity to rebut investigation reports before claim repudiation, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act insurance claim repudiation fraudulent claim natural justice

Apoorva Arora & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

19 Mar 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 223

The Supreme Court held that vulgar language and profanities in a web-series do not constitute obscenity or sexually explicit material under Sections 67 and 67A of the IT Act, quashing the FIR against the creators.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant obscenity Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 67 IT Act Section 67A IT Act

Shiv Prasad Semwal v. State of Uttarakhand

19 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 220

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR alleging offences under Sections 153A and 504 IPC, holding that the publication did not promote enmity between groups and the allegations failed to disclose any cognizable offence, thus amounting to abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 153A IPC Section 504 IPC quashing of FIR abuse of process of law

NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED v. ZILLION INFRAPROJECTS PVT.LTD

19 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 218
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a general reference to terms and conditions containing an arbitration clause does not incorporate that clause into a contract absent specific intention, and upheld exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts as per the Letter of Intent, setting aside the appointment of an arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause incorporation Section 11(6) Arbitration Act Letter of Intent jurisdiction clause

Puneet Sabharwal v. CBI

19 Mar 2024 · Vikram Nath; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 221
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that income tax orders are not conclusive proof of lawful income sources and upheld framing of charges for disproportionate assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, dismissing appellants' plea for discharge based on income tax proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal framing of charges

MS. X v. MR. A

18 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Rajesh Bindal; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 216
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings where the prosecution failed to prima facie establish offences and the promise of marriage did not vitiate consent under Section 375 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings promise of marriage consent vitiated

Ekene Godwin v. State of Tamil Nadu

18 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 229
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed bail and ordered a de novo trial after holding that recording only examination-in-chief without cross-examination and without legal aid counsel violates fair trial rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant legal aid examination-in-chief cross-examination fair trial

Periyasamy v. The State

18 Mar 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 212
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside murder convictions due to unreliable interested witnesses, investigative lapses, and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant conviction interested witnesses private defence police investigation