Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Limited and Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation

23 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 623
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed criminal prosecution against Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Limited and its MD, holding that audit objections and sanction denials negate criminal liability in coal rejects disposal under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Coal Mines Joint Venture Agreement Coal rejects disposal Comptroller and Auditor General Audit Report Prevention of Corruption Act sanction denial

PAM DEVELOPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

23 Aug 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 628

The Supreme Court upheld the contractual bar on claims for idle labour, restored the award for interest on delayed payments, and confirmed the arbitrator's power to grant pre-reference interest under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7) pre-reference interest interest on delayed payments

OMKAR REALTORS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. KUSHALRAJ LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

23 Aug 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; PANKAJ MITHAL · 2024 INSC 629

The Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC's order holding the respondent a consumer and found deficiency in service due to double allotment, directing refund with interest and dismissing the developer's appeal.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant consumer protection Section 2(7) Consumer Protection Act deficiency in service unfair trade practice

Union of India v. M/S. B. T. Patil and Sons

22 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 83

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of a civil contractor to duty drawback benefits as deemed export and interest on delayed refund under the Exim Policy 1992-1997 and relevant statutory provisions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant deemed export duty drawback interest on delayed refund Exim Policy 1992-1997

Union of India v. Bahareh Bakshi

22 Aug 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sudhanshu Dhulia; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 646

The Supreme Court held that the physical or virtual presence of the Indian citizen spouse is mandatory for processing OCI card applications based on marriage, setting aside the Delhi High Court's order dispensing with this requirement.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Overseas Citizen of India Card Section 7A Citizenship Act 1955 Visa Manual personal interview

Dr. Vijay Dixit & Ors. v. Pagadal Krishna & Ors.

22 Aug 2024 · Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 627

The Supreme Court held that applications for condonation of delay in filing written statements pending before consumer fora prior to 04.03.2020 must be decided on merits, setting aside orders forfeiting such rights for delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 13 condonation of delay written statement

Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Union of India

22 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 619

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in an NDPS case, holding that statements under Section 67 are inadmissible and that conviction requires proof of possession, transportation, or conspiracy with proper charges framed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 22(c) Section 29 Section 67 statement

Rajkaran Singh v. Union of India

22 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 621
Cites 4 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that employees managing the SSD Fund, despite being classified as temporary, are entitled to pensionary benefits under the 6th CPC as they possess characteristics of regular government servants, and denial of such benefits is arbitrary and unconstitutional.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission SSD Fund Special Frontier Force pensionary benefits

Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur at Imphal & Anr

22 Aug 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sudhanshu Dhulia; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 647
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that executive resolutions cannot override statutory recruitment rules prescribing cumulative evaluation, and declared the petitioner successful for failing viva-voce cut-off introduced mid-process without notice.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant legitimate expectation statutory rules executive instructions viva-voce cut-off

Swati Priyadarshini v. State of Madhya Pradesh

22 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 620
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-extension of a contractual appointment carrying stigmatic consequences requires a regular enquiry under Article 311(2), and quashed the termination order for non-compliance with natural justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contractual termination stigmatic order Article 311(2) natural justice

Dinesh Sahu alias Dinnu v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

22 Aug 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 740

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder, affirming that concurrent findings based on credible evidence cannot be lightly disturbed despite hostile witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention hostile witnesses

Girish Gandhi v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

22 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 617

The Supreme Court allowed consolidation of sureties furnished in one FIR to cover multiple bail orders across States, relaxing onerous bail conditions to uphold the petitioner's fundamental right to liberty.

criminal petition_allowed Significant bail sureties personal bond Article 21

Indian Council of Agricultural Research v. Rajinder Singh

22 Aug 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 622

The Supreme Court held that technical personnel governed by distinct service rules are not entitled to advance increments granted to scientists upon acquiring a Ph.D., affirming reasonable classification under Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant advance increments Ph.D. qualification technical personnel scientists

State Project Director, UP Education for All Project Board v. Saroj Maurya

21 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 677

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order for lack of reasoned judgment and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, affirming the mandatory requirement of reasoned judicial decisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant reasoned judgment absence of reasons natural justice procedural law

Rekha Sharma v. Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur

21 Aug 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 615
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that no separate cut off marks are required for persons with benchmark disabilities under overall horizontal reservation, dismissing appeals challenging their non-disclosure in judicial service recruitment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Persons with benchmark disabilities Horizontal reservation Vertical reservation Cut off marks

State of West Bengal v. Accused

20 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 614
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the conviction of a man for aggravated sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, rejected the High Court’s acquittal based on irrelevant observations, and emphasized the State’s duty to protect and rehabilitate child victims.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act juvenile justice child sexual offence rape

ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA v. ORDER

20 Aug 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 613
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court mandated a National Task Force to formulate a national protocol ensuring safety and dignity of medical professionals following a brutal rape and murder incident, emphasizing systemic institutional reforms and compliance with sexual harassment laws.

criminal other Significant violence against medical professionals institutional safety sexual harassment Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013

Gautam Kumar Das v. NCT of Delhi and Others

20 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 610

The Supreme Court restored custody of a minor daughter to her biological father, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child and the father's status as natural guardian.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody dispute natural guardian minor child welfare Guardians and Wards Act

Ravi Agrawal v. Union of India & Another

20 Aug 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 648

The Supreme Court held that the amendment to Section 80DD of the Income Tax Act cannot be applied retrospectively to existing policies, dismissing the petition seeking such relief while upholding the prospective amendment made by Parliament.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 80DD Income Tax Act disability benefits retrospective amendment public interest litigation

Shabna Abdulla v. Union of India

20 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 612

The Supreme Court quashed a COFEPOSA detention order for non-supply of WhatsApp chat documents relied upon in the order, affirming the detenue's right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation and underscoring the binding nature of coordinate Bench decisions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant COFEPOSA preventive detention Article 22(5) Constitution of India non-supply of documents