Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Yash Tuteja & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 301
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that offences not listed as scheduled offences under the PMLA cannot sustain a complaint under the Act and quashed the complaint accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 scheduled offence Section 3 PMLA Section 44(1)(b) PMLA

Pathapati Subba Reddy v. Special Deputy Collector (LA)

08 Apr 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 286
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a 5659-day delay in filing an appeal under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing strict enforcement of limitation laws and discretionary denial of delay condonation in absence of sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 3 Limitation Act Section 5 Limitation Act Land Acquisition Act

Vipin Sahni v. Central Bureau of Investigation

08 Apr 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 284

The Supreme Court restored the discharge of appellants from cheating and criminal conspiracy charges, holding that no dishonest inducement of AICTE was proved and the CBI improperly invoked inherent powers to challenge the discharge.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 120B IPC Cheating Criminal conspiracy

Raj Reddy Kallem v. State of Haryana & Anr.

08 Apr 2024 · A. S. Bopanna; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2024 INSC 347
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings and appeals under Section 138 NI Act and related IPC offences after full repayment and interest by the appellant, despite complainant's refusal to compound, exercising powers under Article 142 for complete justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Compounding of offences Consent of complainant Quashing of criminal proceedings

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Virendra Bahadur Katheria

06 Apr 2024 · Surya Kant; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 524

The Supreme Court held that the State’s 2011 Order implementing revised pay scales for SDI/ABSA and DBSA subsumed earlier High Court orders under the doctrine of merger, upheld the pay scales notionally from 2006 and actually from 2008, disallowed recovery of excess payments from retirees, and dismissed the State’s delayed intra-court appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay scale anomaly doctrine of merger res judicata intra-court appeal

OMSAIRAM STEELS & ALLOYS PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BBSR

06 Apr 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 520

The Supreme Court allowed a fresh e-auction after holding that a bona fide inadvertent bidding error, promptly reported and unrectifiable by the system, warrants equitable relief rather than enforcement of an exorbitant mistaken bid.

civil appeal_allowed Significant e-auction bona fide mistake bid security Mineral Auction Rules, 2015

MAYA GOPINATHAN v. ANOOP S.B.

05 Apr 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 334
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that in matrimonial disputes, misappropriation of stridhan jewellery must be proved on a balance of probabilities and restored the Family Court's decree awarding compensation to the wife.

family appeal_allowed Significant stridhan property misappropriation standard of proof preponderance of probabilities

M/s. Jaiprakash Industries Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

05 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 273

The Supreme Court held that amalgamation of lessee companies amounts to transfer under the lease deed, attracting liability to pay unearned increase value to the lessor.

property appeal_dismissed Significant amalgamation unearned increase value perpetual lease deed transfer of property

Chandan v. The State (Delhi Admn.)

05 Apr 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 271

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative forensic evidence despite absence of motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony absence of motive

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shilpa Jain & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 278

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of an FIR alleging fraudulent property transactions, holding that title disputes are civil matters but criminal allegations of forgery and conspiracy warrant investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR title dispute civil vs criminal dispute

Aqeel Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another

05 Apr 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 268

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders for accused in a murder case, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny in serious offences and cancelling bail granted without proper consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder Section 302 IPC High Court bail orders

ANNAPURNA B. UPPIN & ORS. v. MALSIDDAPPA & ANR.

05 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 276
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a consumer complaint is not maintainable for a commercial dispute involving a partnership firm where the complainant was a partner, and legal heirs of a deceased partner are not liable for firm debts after dissolution.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Partnership firm Registered partnership deed Legal heirs liability

Shoma Kanti Sen v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

05 Apr 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 269
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court granted bail to Shoma Kanti Sen in a UAPA case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish prima facie truth of accusations under bail-restricting provisions despite serious allegations and prolonged detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 43-D(5) UAPA prima facie true

Manikandan v. State by the Inspector of Police

05 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 272
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to police tutoring of prosecution witnesses and failure to examine independent eyewitnesses, thereby undermining the prosecution case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant tutoring of witnesses police misconduct Section 302 IPC murder conviction

Deep Mukerjee v. Sreyashi Banerjee

05 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 274

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal directing the husband to undergo a potentiality test in matrimonial proceedings, modifying the High Court's order that had set aside the Trial Court's direction.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act restitution of conjugal rights medical examination potentiality test

Shivani Tyagi v. State of U.P. & Anr

05 Apr 2024 · Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 343
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's suspension of sentence and bail granted to acid attack convicts, holding that serious offences require objective assessment of relevant factors and monetary compensation cannot justify suspension of sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 389 CrPC suspension of sentence bail acid attack

Operation Mobilization India & Ors. v. State of Telangana & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 275

The Supreme Court allowed the petitioners to use frozen accounts for essential expenses under strict audit conditions while clarifying that investigation of FCRA cases involving large sums must be conducted by the competent authority as notified by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 investigation jurisdiction Economic Offences Wing CID Telangana

State of Maharashtra v. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd.

05 Apr 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 270

The Supreme Court held that stamp duty on Articles of Association including increased share capital is payable subject to a one-time maximum cap, and Form No. 5 is not separately chargeable to stamp duty.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Stamp Duty Articles of Association Form No. 5 Companies Act, 1956

Yogesh @ Sonu Tharu v. The State

04 Apr 2024 · M. M. Sundresh; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 305

The Supreme Court modified the murder conviction of one accused to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and acquitted the other for lack of participation, emphasizing the limits of vicarious liability under Section 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder vicarious liability

Navneet Kaur Harbhajansing Kundles v. State of Maharashtra and Others

04 Apr 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 266

The Supreme Court restored the Scrutiny Committee's validation of the appellant's Scheduled Caste certificate, holding that the High Court erred in reappreciating evidence and interfering under Article 226 without jurisdictional error.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant caste certificate Scheduled Caste Scrutiny Committee Article 226