Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Suhas Chakma v. Union of India

09 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 813
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court affirmed the fundamental right of prisoners to free and effective legal aid under Article 21 and issued comprehensive directions to strengthen legal aid mechanisms and ensure access to justice for all prisoners.

criminal petition_allowed Significant free legal aid prisoners' rights Article 21 Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Dharmendra Sharma v. Agra Development Authority

06 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 667

The Supreme Court held that possession offered without mandatory completion and firefighting certificates is invalid, extended limitation due to part payments, affirmed NCDRC's jurisdiction, and awarded refund with interest plus additional compensation to the purchaser.

civil appeal_allowed Significant offer of possession completion certificate firefighting clearance certificate Consumer Protection Act, 1986

ANANTDEEP SINGH v. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

06 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 673

The Supreme Court directed reinstatement of a judicial officer whose termination during probation was set aside, awarding back wages and emphasizing that termination orders cannot be retrospective and must comply with Court directions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant termination of service probationer reinstatement back wages

Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

06 Sep 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 662
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that immunity granted by the Settlement Commission bars prosecution where proceedings have not been instituted prior, and quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant-company for alleged CVD evasion based on MRP.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant immunity Settlement Commission Countervailing Duty Maximum Retail Price

RICARDO CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. v. RAVI KUCKIAN & OTHERS

06 Sep 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 715

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to file a written statement after the limitation period expired, holding that limitation starts from receipt of notice accompanied by complaint and that denial of complaint copy service violates fair hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act written statement limitation period service of complaint

Mandakini Diwan and Anr. v. High Court of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 666

The Supreme Court directed a CBI investigation into the suspicious death of Ms. Ranjana Diwan, emphasizing the need for an independent inquiry where bias or influence is alleged to ensure a fair investigation and uphold fundamental rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. fair investigation influence and bias

Somprabha Rana & Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 664
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that custody of a minor child should not be disturbed via writ of Habeas Corpus without considering the child's welfare and directed substantive custody proceedings under the Guardians and Wards Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant Habeas Corpus custody of minor welfare of child Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

Devendra Kumar Pal v. State of U.P and Another

06 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 679

The Supreme Court held that a trial court cannot summon an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. after pronouncing conviction and sentence, quashing such summoning order passed post-sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused conviction and sentence trial procedure

Chirag Bhanu Singh & Anr v. High Court of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 660

The Supreme Court held that elevation of High Court judges must be reconsidered collectively by the High Court Collegium, and writ petitions challenging lack of effective consultation in judicial appointments are maintainable within limited judicial review.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant judicial appointments High Court Collegium effective consultation judicial review

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. V.V. Brahma Reddy

06 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 663

The Supreme Court held that Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act governs allocation of Public Sector Undertaking employees post bifurcation, validating repatriation orders and rejecting the High Court's reliance on Section 77.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 Section 77 Section 82 Public Sector Undertakings

P.N. Gupta v. Rajinder Singh Dogra

05 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 705
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the finding of medical negligence against a doctor for delayed referral and inadequate postoperative care, confirming compensation awarded by the National Consumer Commission with modified interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence consumer protection informed consent standard of care

Kerala Agricultural University & Anr. v. T.P. Murali @ Murali Thavara

04 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 658

Termination of a government employee for failure to resume duty after long leave without allowance is invalid if mandatory procedural safeguards, including recording prima facie satisfaction before inquiry, are not complied with.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant Leave Without Allowance Departmental Inquiry Prima Facie Satisfaction Termination of Service

Ishwar v. Bhim Singh

04 Sep 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 651

The Supreme Court held that the Execution Court has jurisdiction to entertain rescission and extension of time applications under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act even if the decree was passed by the appellate court, and upheld the extension of time for deposit of balance sale consideration, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Performance Section 28 Specific Relief Act Execution Court Jurisdiction Extension of Time

RANJEET MITTAL v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

03 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 766

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing charges of abetment to suicide and related offences at the prima facie stage, directing continuation of trial based on sufficient material on record.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of charges abetment to suicide Section 306 IPC

Choudappa & Anr. v. Choudappa Since Deceased by Lrs. & Ors.

03 Sep 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 691

The Supreme Court held that proceedings for inquiry into mesne profits under Order XX Rule 12 CPC are a continuation of the original suit and not barred by limitation, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the delayed application.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XX Rule 12 CPC mesne profits limitation final decree

Vaibhav Jain v. Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd.

03 Sep 2024 · J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 652
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a vehicle dealer who neither owned nor controlled the vehicle at the time of accident cannot be held liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 owner liability dealership agreement

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. MAYA DEVI

02 Sep 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 1050
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's liability to pay compensation in a motor accident claim, holding that mere allegations of fraud without proof cannot absolve the insurer from indemnity obligations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim insurance liability fraud in insurance burden of proof

N.M. THEERTHEGOWDA v. Y.M. ASHOK KUMAR

02 Sep 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 649

The Supreme Court upheld the imposition of ten times penalty on deficit stamp duty under Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act where the appellant agreed to pay duty and penalty at interlocutory stage, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Karnataka Stamp Act Section 34 Section 39 deficit stamp duty

SEETHARAMA SHETTY v. MONAPPA SHETTY

02 Sep 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 650
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that when an insufficiently stamped instrument is sent to the District Registrar under Section 37(2) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, the court cannot impose ten times penalty under Section 34, and the penalty must be determined by the District Registrar under Section 39.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Section 33 Section 34 Section 37

Modern Builders v. State of Madhya Pradesh

30 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 643

The Supreme Court restored an arbitral award set aside by the High Court solely on jurisdictional grounds, holding that failure to timely object to arbitrator's jurisdiction precludes annulment of the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator