Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Krishnadatt Awasthy v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

04 Apr 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 252
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the setting aside of appointments of candidates related to selection committee members due to reasonable likelihood of bias, holding that non-joinder without prejudice does not violate natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reasonable likelihood of bias natural justice audi alteram partem selection committee

Sant Bhagwan Baba Shikshan Mandal v. Gunwant

03 Apr 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 405

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of a non-teaching employee to appointment as Shikshan Sevak upon acquiring requisite qualifications under amended statutory provisions, directing appointment with compensation and confirming the High Court's judgment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Shikshan Sevak non-teaching employee appointment Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977

Samaj Parivartana Samudaya v. State of Karnataka

03 Apr 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; M. M. Sundresh; Bela M. Trivedi · 2024 INSC 304

The Supreme Court held that revised returns filed post suspension of mining are inadmissible for payment claims, refund of guarantee money depends on full R&R Plan implementation, and mining lease categorization cannot be reopened, affirming its exclusive jurisdiction over related disputes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant mining leases iron ore revised returns guarantee money refund

Union of India & Anr. v. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy

03 Apr 2024 · J.B. Pardiwala; Aniruddha Bose · 2024 INSC 262
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a 12-year delay in restoring a dismissed writ petition, emphasizing the necessity of sufficient cause and judicial restraint in condonation applications.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay sufficient cause limitation restoration of writ petition

PREM RAJ v. POONAMMA MENON

02 Apr 2024 · Sanjay Karol; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 260
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a civil court's decree declaring a cheque as security is binding on criminal courts, quashing criminal conviction under Section 138 N.I. Act arising from the same cheque.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Civil court decree binding on criminal court Security cheque

PURNI DEVI & ANR. v. BABU RAM & ANR.

02 Apr 2024 · Sanjay Karol; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 259

The Supreme Court held that time spent pursuing execution proceedings in a court lacking jurisdiction in good faith and with due diligence is excluded from limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, allowing the execution application to proceed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act Section 14 Execution application limitation Article 182 Jammu and Kashmir Limitation Act Section 48 CPC

Ballu @ Balram @ Balmukund and Another v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

02 Apr 2024 · B.R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 258

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal in a murder case, holding that circumstantial evidence must exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence and appellate courts should not overturn acquittals without perversity or impossibility in the trial court's findings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence appeal against acquittal proof beyond reasonable doubt perversity in findings

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED v. A.S. RAGHAVENDRA

02 Apr 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 265
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that a senior managerial employee with supervisory duties and high salary is not a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, and the High Court erred in reappreciating Labour Court's factual findings.

labor appeal_allowed Significant workman definition Industrial Disputes Act 1947 managerial employee writ jurisdiction

M/S BARSUA IRON ORE MINES v. THE VICE PRESIDENT UNITED MINES MAZDOOR UNION

02 Apr 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 264
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an employee cannot belatedly alter his date of birth declared at initial employment to gain service benefits, upholding the employer’s original determination and setting aside back wages awarded on the revised date.

labor appeal_allowed Significant date of birth estoppel industrial dispute employment eligibility

National Spot Exchange Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Apr 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 694

The Supreme Court upheld that secured creditors have no priority over assets attached under PMLA and MPID Act, affirming the constitutionality of consolidated execution proceedings under Article 142 for speedy recovery to investors.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Article 142 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act, 1999 SARFAESI Act, 2002

Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India

26 Mar 2024 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Dinesh Maheshwari; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that a seaman's heart condition not caused by injury during employment does not qualify for disability compensation under the National Maritime Board Agreement or disability benefits under the Disability Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disability compensation National Maritime Board Agreement Dilated Cardiomyopathy injury during employment

Kamukayi & Ors. v. Union of India

26 Mar 2024 · Surya Kant; J. K. Maheshwari
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger who died due to an untoward railway incident and awarded compensation with interest, setting aside lower courts' dismissal of the claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act 1989 untoward incident bona fide passenger compensation

Amudha v. The State

22 Mar 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 244

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed proceedings against the appellant under Section 306 IPC, holding that mere harassment without proximate incitement is insufficient for abetment of suicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide harassment proximate incitement

Sabita Paul v. State of West Bengal & Anr.

22 Mar 2024 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 245

The Supreme Court allowed anticipatory bail to the appellant mother accused of conspiracy in blackmail, applying the parity principle with her son who was granted bail, and set aside the cancellation order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail parity principle suppression of material facts Section 120-B IPC

M/S ACME PAPERS LTD v. M/S CHINTAMAN DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

22 Mar 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 248

The Supreme Court held that suits concerning immovable property must be tried where the property is situated and dismissed the petition seeking transfer away from that jurisdiction, emphasizing avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant transfer petition jurisdiction immovable property Section 16 CPC

Thirumoorthy v. State

22 Mar 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 247

The Supreme Court quashed the conviction of a juvenile for murder due to non-compliance with mandatory Juvenile Justice Act procedures, emphasizing strict adherence to preliminary assessment and trial safeguards for children in conflict with law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Child in Conflict with Law Juvenile Justice Act 2015 Preliminary assessment Children’s Court

Ram Murti Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh

22 Mar 2024 · Sudhansu Dhulia; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 250

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a murder case for lack of proper reasoning and upheld the Sessions Judge's rejection of bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail heinous crime murder Sessions Judge

Awungshi Chirmayo and Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Others

22 Mar 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2024 INSC 249

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed transfer of investigation into the suspicious death of a young woman to the CBI, emphasizing the need for a thorough and impartial inquiry to ensure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation transfer of investigation Section 302 IPC Section 306 IPC

Bloomberg Television Production Services India Private Limited v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited

22 Mar 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 255

The Supreme Court set aside an ex-parte interim injunction against a media article for lack of reasoned application of the three-fold test and emphasized exceptional caution in defamation suits to protect free speech.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction defamation free speech media law

State of Haryana v. Dr. Ritu Singh

22 Mar 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 263

The Supreme Court held that an FIR involving cognizable offences against the State cannot be quashed merely on the basis of a compromise between complainant and accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR compromise cognizable offence defrauding State