Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Jaseela Shaji v. Union of India

12 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 683
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court quashed a COFEPOSA detention order due to non-supply of relied-upon material and delay in deciding representations, violating Article 22(5) rights of the detenu.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) Constitution COFEPOSA non-supply of documents

Rabbu @ Sarvesh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

12 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 720
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape and murder but commuted the death penalty to 20 years rigorous imprisonment considering mitigating factors and the reliability of the dying declaration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration death penalty rarest of rare commutation

Pune Municipal Corporation v. Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch

12 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 682
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a waste processing plant authorized and operational before the 2016 Rules is governed by the 2000 Rules, set aside the NGT's closure order, and directed compliance with pollution control measures.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules 2000 Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules 2016 National Green Tribunal Act 2010 Environmental Clearance

Sukhmander Singh v. State of Punjab

11 Sep 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sudhanshu Dhulia; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 736

The Supreme Court held that recruitment selection criteria must be fixed prior to the process, merit-based, and transparent, disallowing marks for rural residence and limiting interview shortlisting to five times the vacancies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment process selection criteria merit-based selection shortlisting candidates

Lakshmesh M. v. P. Rajalakshmi

11 Sep 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 678

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's ownership of the suit property and set aside the High Court's grant of compensation to private defendants lacking title or claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant title and ownership land acquisition compensation entitlement possession

Beena and Ors. v. Charan Das (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.

11 Sep 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 680
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a consent order in eviction proceedings conditioned on deposit of money does not transfer ownership to the tenant, and set aside the High Court's contrary decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1971 Section 14 eviction consent order transfer of ownership

R.P. GARG v. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER

10 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 743

The Supreme Court held that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is mandatory and cannot be excluded by contract, allowing the appellant's claim for interest on the arbitral award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant post-award interest Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7)(b) contractual prohibition

Khursheed & Anr. v. Shaqoor

10 Sep 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 764

The Supreme Court held that suits for cancellation of voidable sale deeds executed by fraud do not abate under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and Civil Courts retain jurisdiction despite consolidation proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 Section 5(2)(a) Section 49 voidable document

Manilal v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors

10 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 675

The Supreme Court held that candidates admitted to B.Ed courses before 29.07.2011 are exempt from minimum graduation percentage criteria for teacher recruitment, and directed regularization of the appellant’s appointment, emphasizing non-discrimination under Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Teacher recruitment Minimum percentage marks Bachelor of Education admission NCTE notification

S VIJIKUMARI v. MOWNESHWARACHARI C

10 Sep 2024 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 732

The Supreme Court held that alteration or revocation of maintenance orders under Section 25(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 applies only prospectively upon change in circumstances and cannot set aside final orders or refund maintenance already paid.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 25(2) maintenance order alteration modification revocation

Raghuveer Sharan v. District Sahakari Krishi Gramin Vikas Bank

10 Sep 2024 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 681

The Supreme Court held that a witness who makes self-incriminating statements under compulsion has only qualified immunity under Section 132 of the Evidence Act and can be summoned as an accused under Section 319 CrPC if independent incriminating evidence exists.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 132 Indian Evidence Act Section 319 CrPC self-incrimination witness immunity

SK. GOLAM LALCHAND v. NANDU LAL SHAW

10 Sep 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 676

A co-owner cannot transfer entire joint property without partition; sale by one co-owner binds only to his share, and injunctions protect co-owners' rights until partition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint ownership partition sale deed co-owner

Dhanraj Aswani v. Amar S. Mulchandani

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 669
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a person already in custody in one case can maintain an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in a different case, with the bail becoming effective only upon arrest in the subsequent case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC maintainability custody

Sikha Ghosh & Others v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 697
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court disposed of a Special Leave Petition concerning eviction by consent, holding that disputed factual issues are not suitable for writ jurisdiction and directing vacant possession by a specified date with mutual settlement of claims.

civil appeal_allowed writ petition eviction vacant possession disputed questions of fact

Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 674
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking to halt arms exports to Israel, holding that foreign policy decisions lie exclusively with the Union Government and are not subject to judicial intervention under Article 32.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 32 Constitution foreign policy arms export judicial restraint

Sahil Bhargava & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 699

The Supreme Court granted interim relief allowing medical students to retrieve original documents upon partial fee deposit and undertaking during pendency of fee fixation disputes under Uttarakhand law.

education appeal_allowed Significant fee fixation unaided private professional educational institutions interim relief original documents

Union of India v. Lt. Col. Rahul Arora

09 Sep 2024 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 672

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of Court Martial proceedings due to the defective appointment of a junior Judge Advocate without recorded non-availability of a senior officer, reaffirming the strict procedural safeguards under military law.

military_law appeal_dismissed Significant Judge Advocate Court Martial Army Act Army Rules

Chalasani Udaya Shankar v. M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

09 Sep 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 671
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the NCLT and NCLAT dismissals of a rectification petition under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, restoring the case for fresh consideration after proper evidence appraisal.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 2013 Section 59 Rectification of Register of Members Share transfer dispute

Cox & Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 670
Cites 0 · Cited by 15

The Supreme Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, only prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed an arbitrator, leaving complex jurisdictional issues including joinder of non-signatories to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 16 Group of Companies doctrine

M/s SITARAM ENTERPRISES v. PRITHVIRAJ VARDICHAND JAIN

09 Sep 2024 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 685

The Supreme Court held the tenant guilty of contempt for willful non-compliance of eviction orders, granted a final one-week extension to vacate, and authorized forcible possession with costs recoverable from the contemnor.

civil petition_allowed Significant contempt of court willful disobedience eviction Supreme Court order