Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

PERNOD RICARD INDIA (P) LTD v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

19 Apr 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; ARAVIND KUMAR · 2024 INSC 327
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the substituted rule reducing penalty applies to proceedings initiated after substitution, even for violations committed before, setting aside the higher penalty imposed under the old rule.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant substitution of rule penalty Madhya Pradesh Excise Act foreign liquor rules

Jadunath Singh v. Arvind Kumar & Anr.

19 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 325

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to two accused involved in a separate murder and absconding during trial custody, emphasizing the need to consider conduct and material facts in bail decisions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder absconding trial custody

Ramayan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

19 Apr 2024 · Sanjay Karol; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 323

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders for accused in a murder case, emphasizing the need for cautious exercise of bail discretion in serious offences with credible witness intimidation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC murder witness intimidation

Hansraj v. State of M.P.

19 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 318
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of the prosecution to properly prove the disclosure statement and recovery of stolen articles, emphasizing strict proof requirements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant disclosure statement Section 27 Indian Evidence Act recovery of stolen property identification evidence

Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar and Others v. State of Karnataka

19 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 320
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court restored the trial Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case, holding that the High Court erred in reversing acquittal without finding perversity or no other possible view except guilt, and that disclosure statements and recoveries were not proved in accordance with law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal scope of appellate interference Section 27 Indian Evidence Act disclosure statement

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India v. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu & Ors.

19 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 319

The Supreme Court held that offences under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are to be tried by Special Courts constituted under the Companies Act, 2013 as it existed at the Code's commencement, rejecting the High Court's quashing of proceedings for want of jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 236 Special Court Companies Act, 2013

Mrinmoy Maity v. Chhanda Koley

18 Apr 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 314
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that delay and laches disentitle a rival applicant from challenging LPG distributorship allotment and upheld the Corporation's acceptance of alternate land under amended guidelines.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant delay and laches writ jurisdiction Article 226 LPG distributorship

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Satish Jain

18 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 315

The Supreme Court held that an agreement and arbitration award based on an ex-parte decree later set aside lack legal sanctity, and directed the suit to proceed on merits protecting State ownership of land.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree adverse possession arbitration award Section 89 CPC

GOVIND KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. v. BANK OF BARODA & ORS.

18 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 326
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside an auction sale under SARFAESI Act for non-compliance with mandatory notice rules, restored appellants' tenancy status, and directed refund of auction money with 12% compound interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 auction sale mandatory notice

Mukhtar Zaidi v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

18 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 316

The Supreme Court held that when a Magistrate relies on affidavits filed with a Protest Petition after police closure report, the matter must be treated as a complaint under Section 190(1)(a) Cr.P.C. and proceeded with accordingly, setting aside the summoning order treating it as a State case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 190 Cr.P.C. Protest Petition Police closure report Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.

The State of West Bengal v. Jayeeta Das

18 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 313

The Supreme Court held that until the State Government constitutes a Special Court under the NIA Act, the Sessions Court has jurisdiction to try UAPA offences and authorize remand, reversing the High Court's quashing of such proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant UAPA jurisdiction Special Court NIA Act Section 22 Sessions Court jurisdiction

THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH v. KAMAL AGARWAL & ORS.

18 Apr 2024 · Vikram Nath; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 317

The Supreme Court quashed a criminal FIR registered in Arunachal Pradesh for a civil dispute over property transactions occurring in Rajasthan, holding lack of territorial jurisdiction and misuse of criminal law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction quashing of FIR civil dispute criminal proceedings

Kirpal Singh v. State of Punjab

18 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 312

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to wholly unreliable and uncorroborated prosecution evidence, emphasizing the primacy of quality over quantity of evidence in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt reliability of witnesses motive in criminal law concurrent findings

State of Telangana v. Mohd. Abdul Qasim

18 Apr 2024 · M. M. Sundresh; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 310

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in allowing a review petition that set aside concurrent judgments confirming forest land status, affirming the limited scope of review and the statutory scheme for forest land declaration under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Review jurisdiction Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 Forest Settlement Officer

Dharambir @ Dharma v. State of Haryana

16 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 307

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder under Section 302 IPC due to wholly unreliable prosecution witnesses and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder extra judicial confession reliability of witnesses

Ramvir @ Saket Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

16 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 308

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder and attempted murder based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, dismissing claims of fabrication and private defence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 307 IPC murder attempted murder

Association of Engineers v. The State of Tamil Nadu

16 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 306

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of appointing Technical Assistants as Assistant Engineers under executive orders pending formal rule amendments, dismissing challenges based on statutory and constitutional grounds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Technical Assistants Assistant Engineers Government Orders Recruitment by transfer

Sandeep Kumar v. GB Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology

16 Apr 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 309

The Supreme Court held that termination without disciplinary enquiry violates natural justice and reinstated the appellant after quashing the termination order, setting aside the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition on technical grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant termination of service disciplinary enquiry natural justice writ petition

Arcadia Shipping Ltd. v. Tata Steel Limited

16 Apr 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Dipankar Datta · 2024 INSC 333
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Delhi High Court has territorial jurisdiction over a suit involving interconnected sale and shipment transactions, permitting joinder of all defendants including the shipper in a single suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction cause of action Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 20(c)

Meher Fatima Hussain v. Jamia Milia Islamia

15 Apr 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 303

The Supreme Court held that university teachers appointed through proper selection processes are entitled to regularisation upon merger of posts, and arbitrary refusal to continue their service violates Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant University appointments Regularisation of service University Grants Commission Article 14