Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

04 Oct 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 763

The Supreme Court held that the State cannot cancel a completed recruitment process by changing eligibility rules post facto and directed preparation of a fresh select list in accordance with settled legal principles and prior judicial orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recruitment process Junior Engineer AICTE approval eligibility criteria

M/s. Shriram Investments v. Commissioner of Income Tax III Chennai

04 Oct 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 760

The Supreme Court held that an assessing officer cannot consider claims made in a revised income tax return filed beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 139(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 139(5) revised return limitation

Sukanya Shantha v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Oct 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 753
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that caste-based discriminatory provisions in State prison manuals violate constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity, directing their repeal and mandating affirmative State action to eliminate such discrimination in prisons.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant caste-based discrimination prison manuals Article 14 Article 15

Tarina Sen v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Oct 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 752
Cites 0 · Cited by 20

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings arising from commercial loan disputes can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if the parties have fully settled the dues, thereby preventing oppression and prejudice to the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings One-Time-Settlement commercial dispute

Khalsa University and Another v. State of Punjab and Another

03 Oct 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 751
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the repeal of Khalsa University Act, holding that singling out a single entity for repeal is constitutionally valid if based on reasonable classification with intelligible differentia under Article 14.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 14 reasonable classification manifest arbitrariness single entity legislation

Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax v. M/s Safari Retreats Private Ltd.

03 Oct 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 756
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the CGST Act, clarifying that ITC denial applies only where there is a break in the taxable supply chain and allowing ITC on construction inputs used for immovable property let out on rent to avoid cascading tax.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Section 17(5)(d) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 plant or machinery

Rama Devi v. The State of Bihar

03 Oct 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 755
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the conviction of two accused for the murder of Brij Bihari Prasad and his bodyguard, emphasizing the primacy of credible eyewitness testimony despite minor contradictions and procedural delays.

criminal appeal_partially_allowed Significant eyewitness credibility falsus in uno falsus in omnibus delay in FIR forwarding criminal conspiracy

State of U.P. & Anr. v. Northern Coal Fields

03 Oct 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 948

The Supreme Court held that land vested absolutely in the Central Government and subsequently in a Government Company under the Coal Bearing Areas Act, 1957, extinguishes the State Government's right to claim lease rent, dismissing the State's appeal.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 vesting of land lease rent Government Company

K. Bharthi Devi and Anr. v. State of Telangana and Anr.

03 Oct 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 750

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed criminal proceedings against appellants in a loan fraud case after settlement with the bank, holding that continuation of prosecution would be oppressive and an abuse of process in a dispute predominantly of civil nature.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings One Time Settlement commercial dispute

M/S S. S. PRODUCTION AND ANR. v. TR. PAVITHRAN PRASANTH

01 Oct 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 1059
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 138 NI Act for dishonoured cheques, affirming that failure to rebut statutory presumption of debt leads to conviction and ordered concurrent sentences for multiple offences arising from the same transaction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 presumption Dishonour of cheque Legally enforceable debt

Harshad Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh

01 Oct 2024 · Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 776

The Supreme Court held that once a valid judgment of conviction is pronounced, the successor judge is only required to hear the accused on sentencing, not to re-hear the conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 235 Cr.P.C. Judgment of conviction Quantum of sentence Successor Presiding Officer

V. Vincent Velankanni v. The Union of India and Others

30 Sep 2024 · Sandeep Mehta; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 748
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that seniority in industrial establishments must be reckoned from the date of promotion after probation and trade test completion as per applicable rules, and a subsequent Government Order restoring seniority reckoning from initial appointment applies prospectively only.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant seniority probation trade test promotion

K. Vadivel v. K. Shanthi

30 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 746

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing further investigation in a murder trial, holding that such power must be exercised sparingly and only on sound legal grounds, and directed the trial to conclude expeditiously.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant further investigation Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. Section 311 Cr.P.C. post-cognizance stage

Atul Kumar v. The Chairman (Joint Seat Allocation Authority) and Others

30 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 749

The Supreme Court allowed admission to a Scheduled Caste candidate who missed the fee payment deadline due to procedural difficulties, invoking Article 142 to grant relief and create a supernumerary seat.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 142 Constitution of India Admission to educational institutions Scheduled Caste reservation JEE Advanced 2024

Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd v. Jhabua Power Limited and Others

30 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 768

The Supreme Court held that State Electricity Regulatory Commissions are guided but not bound by State Government policy directions under Section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that review of regulatory orders requires demonstration of error, thereby upholding APTEL's setting aside of KSERC's review order approving power purchase agreements based solely on such directions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 108 State Electricity Regulatory Commission policy directions

Manisha Ravindra Panpatil v. The State of Maharashtra

27 Sep 2024 · Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 762

The Supreme Court set aside the summary removal of a woman Sarpanch based on unverified allegations, emphasizing the need for proper inquiry and protection against discriminatory administrative actions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant elected representative removal Sarpanch disqualification government land encroachment natural justice

LAKHA SINGH v. BALWINDER SINGH

27 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 744
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside concurrent judgments upholding a disputed agreement to sell agricultural land, finding the agreement fabricated and the findings of fact perverse, thereby allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell earnest money concurrent findings

Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited v. M/s Sanman Rice Mills

27 Sep 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 742

The Supreme Court held that appellate courts under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act have limited jurisdiction confined to grounds under Section 34 and cannot reappraise evidence or substitute their view for the arbitrator's, restoring the arbitral award set aside by the High Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 arbitral award

Sanjay Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

27 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 745
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the imposition of a censure entry on a police officer's service record, holding that the procedure under the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers Rules, 1991 and principles of natural justice were duly followed.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant censure entry natural justice show cause notice Uttar Pradesh Police Officers Rules 1991

Ahmednagar District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

27 Sep 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 741

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's belated challenge to an auction sale of cooperative society property, upholding the sale to a statutory body while directing payment of dues to the appellant under Article 142.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant auction sale Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 valuation undervaluation