Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Shiv Pratap Singh Rana v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 481

The Supreme Court quashed rape and criminal intimidation proceedings against the appellant, holding the relationship was consensual and the prosecution's case lacked sufficient material to proceed to trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent rape Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

X v. Y

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 476

The Supreme Court upheld divorce on the ground of desertion due to non-compliance with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights and conditioned its operation on payment of Rs. 30 lakhs as lump sum alimony.

family appeal_allowed Significant restitution of conjugal rights desertion divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Thatireddigari Maheswara Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 495

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on reliable eyewitness testimony of the deceased's relatives corroborated by material evidence, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Eyewitness testimony Interested witnesses Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC

Vishwanatha v. State of Karnataka

08 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 482

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to doubts over his identification in the absence of a Test Identification Parade and inconsistencies between eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade Identification evidence Strangulation Homicide

R. RADHAKRISHNA PRASAD v. SWAMINATHAN & ANR.

08 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 463
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reduction of refundable advance consideration to Rs. 3,00,000/- due to lack of proof for additional payments in a suit for specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement of sale advance payment proof of payment

Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited v. Samir Narain Bhojwani

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 478
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that appellate courts under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act may remand matters only in exceptional cases, set aside the High Court's remand order, and directed fresh hearing on merits to uphold arbitration's objectives of efficiency and minimal court interference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Section 37 appeal remand power

Sardar Ravi Inder Singh v. State of Jharkhand

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 472

The Supreme Court quashed a criminal complaint as an abuse of process where the plaintiff had settled and withdrawn the suit for specific performance, renouncing all claims over the property.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abuse of process quashing of complaint settlement withdrawal of suit

Mahesh Chand Bareth v. State of Rajasthan

08 Jul 2024 · Surya Kant; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 466

The Supreme Court upheld age relaxation and bonus marks granted to candidates with experience in government educational projects in recruitment to the post of Prabodhak, finding no violation of Article 14 or the Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant age relaxation bonus marks educational projects Article 14

The State of West Bengal v. Rajpath Contractors and Engineers Ltd.

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 477

The Supreme Court held that a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act filed after the limitation period expired before court closure is barred, and Section 4 of the Limitation Act does not apply to extend the limitation in such cases.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Limitation Act, 1963 Section 4 Limitation Act

Har Narayan Tewari v. Cantonment Board, Ramgarh

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 467

The Supreme Court held that the plaintiff-appellant's suit for title and possession over disputed land was not barred by res judicata and restored the trial court's decree in his favor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Section 11 CPC title suit possession

The Excise Commissioner Karnataka & Anr. v. Mysore Sales International Ltd. & Ors.

08 Jul 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 484
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that excise contractors who obtain retail vending rights by auction are not "buyers" under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, and Mysore Sales is not liable to collect TDS, also mandating notice and hearing before passing orders under Section 206C(6).

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 206C Income Tax Act Tax Deducted at Source Buyer definition Excise contractors

The State of Punjab v. Partap Singh Verka

08 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 483
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that prior sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act is mandatory before summoning a public servant under Section 319 CrPC, and without such sanction, the summons are invalid.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19 sanction Section 319 CrPC prior sanction mandatory

Union of India v. Pankaj Kumar Srivastava

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 471
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed the Union of India to appoint visually impaired candidates against backlog reserved vacancies under the PWD Act, 1995, exercising its constitutional jurisdiction to remedy statutory non-compliance.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Section 33 PWD Act Section 36 PWD Act reservation

Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur -II v. M/s Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd.

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 470

The Supreme Court upheld that HDPE bags containing multiple poly packs sold to distributors are wholesale packages not liable to duty under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 4A Standards of Weight & Measures Rules, 1977 group package

Nipun Malhotra v. Sony Pictures Films India Private Limited & Ors

08 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 465

The Supreme Court upheld the film's certification while emphasizing the need to balance free speech with the dignity and rights of persons with disabilities, mandating inclusion of disability experts in film certification bodies.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant freedom of speech and expression disability rights film certification stereotyping

Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 479

The Supreme Court held that bail conditions requiring a certificate from the accused's Embassy and dropping a Google Maps PIN for location tracking are onerous and violate constitutional rights, and thus must be deleted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail conditions NDPS Act certificate of assurance foreign accused

Lal Mohammad Manjur Ansari v. The State of Gujrat

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 475

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to unreliable extra-judicial confession, doubtful dying declaration, hostile eyewitnesses, and investigative lapses creating reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC extra-judicial confession dying declaration hostile witnesses

Naresh Kumar v. State of Delhi

08 Jul 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 464
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside a murder conviction due to fatal non-compliance of mandatory questioning under Section 313 CrPC causing material prejudice to the accused, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards in serious offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 313 CrPC incriminating circumstances material prejudice common intention

Suresh Dattu Bhojane & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 468

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 149 IPC, holding that mere presence in an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit murder suffices for liability, even without active participation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object murder

P. Sasikumar v. State

08 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 474
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to unreliable identification evidence arising from the non-conduct of a Test Identification Parade, emphasizing the necessity of TIP when the accused is a stranger to witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade Identification evidence Circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC