Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Sunny @ Santosh Dharmu Bhosale v. State of Maharashtra

20 Nov 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 878

The Supreme Court altered the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, sentencing him to the period already undergone.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC murder culpable homicide

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE

20 Nov 2024 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 880

The Supreme Court held that mobile towers and prefabricated buildings used by telecom service providers qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, entitling them to claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid.

tax appeal_allowed Significant CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 capital goods inputs mobile towers

M.R. Ajayan v. State of Kerala & Ors.

20 Nov 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 881

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing criminal proceedings for tampering with court evidence under Section 195(1)(b) CrPC and restored the trial, affirming liberal locus standi for third parties and the High Court's power to direct investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC cognizance tampering with evidence locus standi

Hetram @ Babli v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

20 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 903
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that power under Section 319 CrPC to summon an additional accused must be exercised only if the evidence, including cross-examination, prima facie implicates the person, and set aside the High Court order summoning the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summons to additional accused prima facie case examination-in-chief

Prashant v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Nov 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 879
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC, holding the relationship was consensual and continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR consent rape

Siddique v. State of Kerala & Anr

19 Nov 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 877

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a delayed sexual offence complaint, emphasizing delay and complainant's conduct as relevant factors and imposing conditions to safeguard investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

The State of Punjab v. M/S Ferrous Alloy Forgings P Ltd.

19 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 890
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a sale certificate issued after court-confirmed auction sale is not liable to stamp duty at issuance and does not require registration, dismissing the State's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant sale certificate auction sale stamp duty registration

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS v. NAVIN KUMAR SINHA

19 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 874
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

Disciplinary proceedings initiated after an officer's superannuation or expiry of extended service are void ab initio; only proceedings initiated before cessation of service may be continued post retirement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceeding superannuation charge memo State Bank of India Officers’ Service Rules, 1992

Leela Agrawal v. Sarkar & Anr.

19 Nov 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 946
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a mortgage deed with a condition converting it into an absolute sale upon default is valid under Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for redemption due to non-payment within the stipulated period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mortgage by conditional sale Section 58(c) Transfer of Property Act equity of redemption clog on equity of redemption

Rajiv Verghese v. Rose Chakkrammankkil

19 Nov 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 876

The Supreme Court restored the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs.1,75,000 per month to the wife, holding that the High Court erred in reducing it by ignoring substantial income and assets of the husband.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance Indian Divorce Act 1869 income assessment standard of living

State of Haryana v. Amin Lal

19 Nov 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 875
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the State cannot claim adverse possession against its own citizens and upheld the plaintiffs' ownership based on revenue records and title documents, dismissing the State's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant adverse possession State property rights Order VIII Rule 5 CPC revenue records

Satyendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

18 Nov 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 873

The Supreme Court held that recording of oral evidence in departmental inquiries proposing major penalty is mandatory, and failure to do so vitiates the inquiry and penalty, thereby restoring the Tribunal's quashing of the penalty imposed on the appellant.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry major penalty Rule 7(3) Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Rules 1999 oral evidence

Gurmeet Singh v. State of Punjab

18 Nov 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 872
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that work-charged service must be counted for Proficiency Step-up benefits under the 1988 Scheme, and denying such benefits to similarly situated employees violates Article 14.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Proficiency Step-up Scheme, 1988 work-charged employees regularisation of service Article 14

Sonam Lakra v. State of Chhattisgarh

14 Nov 2024 · Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 901

The Supreme Court reinstated a female Sarpanch removed without due process, emphasizing the protection of elected representatives' democratic rights and condemning administrative misuse of power.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sarpanch removal natural justice administrative overreach female empowerment

Ramachandra Reddy v. Ramulu Ammal

14 Nov 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 868
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the trial and first appellate courts' finding that a 1963 family settlement deed conferring two-thirds property share was valid consideration-based settlement, overturning the High Court's recharacterization as a gift deed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement deed gift deed consideration family arrangement

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS v. OM PARKASH

13 Nov 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 870
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld termination of an employee for abandonment of service without formal inquiry where the employee absented for over 90 days and concealed subsequent employment, setting aside the High Court's relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant abandonment of service LIC Staff Regulation 1960 termination without inquiry service of notice

Ganapati Bhikarao Naik v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited

13 Nov 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 871

The Supreme Court reinstated a Labour Court Award granting reinstatement to an employee appointed under a land acquisition rehabilitation scheme, holding that factual findings on marriage and entitlement should not be disturbed without compelling reasons.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Labour Court Award rehabilitation package land acquisition employment termination

Didde Srinivas v. State SHO, Podduru Police Station and Anr.

13 Nov 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 892

The Supreme Court confirmed convictions under Sections 451 and 354 IPC, reduced the sentence under Section 354 IPC from two to one year, and upheld concurrent sentences based on credible evidence and proportionality in sentencing.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 451 IPC Section 354 IPC House-trespass Intention to commit offence

Tinku v. State of Haryana & Ors.

13 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 867
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a delayed compassionate appointment claim as time barred under Haryana government policy but allowed the widow to claim ex-gratia financial assistance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment ex-gratia scheme time bar promissory estoppel

In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures

13 Nov 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 866
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that demolitions of accused persons' properties without due process violate constitutional principles and framed pan-India procedural guidelines to prevent arbitrary executive action.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant demolition of property due process of law rule of law separation of powers