Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

P.J. Dharmaraj v. Church of South India

06 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 938

The Supreme Court upheld the retirement of a Director at sixty years, ruling that amended AICTE and UGC regulations increasing retirement age to sixty-five do not apply without State adoption and only benefit teaching staff.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant age of superannuation AICTE regulations UGC regulations private unaided minority educational institution

R. Manohara Murthy and Others v. Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Officer

05 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition by applying cumulative escalation to a base price from prior acquisitions, awarding Rs. 90,000 per acre with statutory benefits.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation market value escalation

P.N.D. PRASAD v. BILLA SATISH & OTHERS

05 Dec 2024 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 964
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Trial Court's direction to reconsider an investigation in a protest petition must be construed as continuation of investigation and not reinvestigation, setting aside the High Court's order that invalidated such direction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant protest petition reinvestigation final police report Section 482 CrPC

Basudev Dutta v. The State of West Bengal and Others

05 Dec 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 940
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court set aside the termination of a government employee for violation of natural justice and directed payment of service benefits, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and timely police verification.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant natural justice termination of service citizenship police verification

Akanksha Arora v. Tanay Maben

04 Dec 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 962

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot dismiss a Section 482 CrPC petition on the ground of alternative remedy under Section 397 CrPC and must convert it into a revision petition to decide on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 397 CrPC interim maintenance inherent powers

IRFAN AKBANI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

04 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 981

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to regularize MDS admissions of appellants who completed their courses despite procedural irregularities, emphasizing equitable treatment and public interest.

education appeal_allowed Significant MDS admission counselling process regularization of admission Article 226

Dechamma I.M. @ Dechamma Koushik v. The State of Karnataka

04 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 972

The Supreme Court held that a woman in a romantic relationship outside marriage is not a "relative" under Section 498A IPC and quashed criminal proceedings against her for alleged dowry harassment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC relative definition dowry harassment quashing of criminal proceedings

Kabir Shankar Bose v. State of West Bengal

04 Dec 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 930

The Supreme Court transferred investigation of politically sensitive FIRs against the petitioner from local police to the CBI to ensure a fair and credible probe.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant fair investigation transfer of investigation CBI political vendetta

HARE RAM YADAV v. STATE OF BIHAR

03 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 936

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal by reducing the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, granting the appellant the benefit of grave and sudden provocation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Section 300 IPC murder

Irfan Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 924

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant for possession of a buttondar knife, holding mere possession without prohibited intent under the Arms Act and related notifications is not an offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Arms Act, 1959 buttondar knife DAD Notification 1980 possession of arms

Union of India v. Saroj Devi

03 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 921
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that death due to illness caused by extreme climatic conditions during active military duty near the Line of Control qualifies as a battle casualty, entitling the widow to Liberalised Family Pension.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Liberalised Family Pension battle casualty physical casualty Army Order 1 of 2003

Shubra P Kandpal v. State of Uttarakhand

03 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 982

The Supreme Court quashed cross FIRs under IPC and SC/ST Act based on a settlement between parties and clarified that caste-based offences under the SC/ST Act require sole causation by caste, invoking Article 142 to end proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC SC/ST Act Article 142 Constitution quashing of FIR

Oachira Parabrahma Temple v. G. Vijayanathakurup

03 Dec 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 922

The Supreme Court appointed a new Administrative Head to conduct elections for the Oachira Parabrahma Temple administration, modified the High Court's removal of elected committees, and directed expeditious Scheme framing, emphasizing adherence to bye-laws and preservation of the temple.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Administrative Head Temple administration Bye-laws Functus officio

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagat Ram

03 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 952

The Supreme Court held that irregularities in sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act do not vitiate conviction unless failure of justice is occasioned, and remanded the matter for reconsideration on this issue.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19 failure of justice

Wadla Bheemaraidu v. State of Telangana

03 Dec 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 923

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove the chain of circumstantial evidence and the disclosure statement under Section 27 Indian Evidence Act as per law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 27 Indian Evidence Act disclosure statement DNA profiling

Ashok v. State of Uttar Pradesh

02 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 919

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure to put material evidence under Section 313 CrPC and denial of effective legal aid, emphasizing the fundamental right to a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 313 CrPC legal aid fair trial rape and murder

Bastiram v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

02 Dec 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 934

The Supreme Court awarded compensation to a dismissed employee, modifying the High Court's order on jurisdiction without deciding the issue, thereby resolving a long-pending labor dispute.

labor appeal_allowed Significant dismissal from service civil court jurisdiction Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 natural justice

Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith v. Government of Gujarat

02 Dec 2024 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 935

The Supreme Court held that under the applicable pension scheme, the State Government alone is liable to pay retiral benefits to an employee of a Grant-in-Aid institution, rejecting the institution's liability despite its litigation conduct.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Grant-in-Aid institution retiral benefits pension liability State Government liability

Jayanandan v. Suresh Kumar

02 Dec 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 956
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a trial court decree cannot be set aside solely on amended pleadings without recording evidence, remanding the matter for reconsideration with opportunity for evidence on the new claim of prescriptive easement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC prescriptive easement evidence

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramkumar Choudhary

29 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 932
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal due to unexplained inordinate delay in filing the second appeal, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws and accountability of State officials.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay sufficient cause limitation period State litigation