Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Vikas Rathi v. The State of U.P. & Anr.

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that the power to summon an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is extraordinary and requires strong evidence, setting aside the High Court's remand and upholding the Trial Court's dismissal of the application against the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning additional accused discretionary power prima facie case

Sarabjit Kaur v. The State of Punjab & Anr.

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court quashed the F.I.R. for cheating and criminal conspiracy, holding that the dispute was civil in nature and criminal proceedings constituted abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of F.I.R. breach of contract cheating Section 420 IPC

Sarabjit Kaur v. The State of Punjab & Anr.

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR alleging cheating in a property sale dispute, holding that breach of contract without fraudulent intent is a civil matter and not a criminal offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Agreement to Sell cheating Section 420 IPC quashing of F.I.R.

Fedrick Cutinha v. State of Karnataka

· V. Ramasubramanian; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction of two accused, restoring their acquittal due to lack of perversity in trial court's findings and procedural lapses in sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acquittal appellate interference presumption of innocence Section 302 IPC

Sabir Ali Khan v. Syed Mohd. Ahmad Ali Khan

· K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy · 2023 INSC 368

The Supreme Court upheld that beneficiaries can acquire title by adverse possession over waqf property despite void transfers and procedural irregularities, dismissing the appeal challenging such title.

property appeal_dismissed Significant waqf property adverse possession Limitation Act 1963 Article 65

Land and Building Department v. Attro Devi

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken by the State, even if compensation has not been paid, setting aside the High Court's order to the contrary.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition possession compensation

State of Uttarakhand and Anr. v. Ravi Kumar

· Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari · 2023 INSC 550

The Supreme Court remanded the dispute over ownership and tenancy rights of land leased under the Government Grants Act for fresh adjudication, emphasizing strict compliance with lease conditions including prior approval for transfer.

property other Significant Government Grants Act, 1895 Leasehold rights Prior approval Bhumidhar

State of Uttarakhand and Anr. v. Ravi Kumar

· Surya Kant; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court remanded the dispute over ownership of land leased under the Government Grants Act for fresh consideration of the validity of transfer and compliance with lease conditions, emphasizing strict adherence to prior approval requirements.

property other Significant Government Grants Act, 1895 prior approval leasehold rights Sale Deed validity

Alpha G184 Owners Association v. Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd.

· J.K. Maheshwari; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that joint consumer complaints by multiple allottees are maintainable despite pendency of registration challenges, directing the National Commission to proceed expeditiously on merits.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 joint complaint pecuniary jurisdiction

Hem Raj v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 644
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that an insurer must indemnify the insured for undisputed medical expenses incurred for third-party treatment under a valid vehicle insurance policy and allowed the appeal directing payment with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance indemnification medical expenses consumer protection third-party insurance claim

Yogendra Prasad Singh v. Ram Bachan Devi

· Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2023 INSC 658

The Supreme Court held that a registered Sale Deed with recitals of transfer of title and possession operates as an absolute sale unless the local practice of ta khubzul badlain applies, invalidating the unilateral cancellation and upholding the plaintiff's ownership.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Sale Deed Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ta khubzul badlain title transfer

District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan v. Manveer Singh and Others

· Sanjiv Khanna; S.V.N. Bhatti

The Supreme Court held that unauthorized construction of a new Panchayat building on a school playground without sanction is illegal, directed disciplinary action against officials, and ordered remedial measures preserving the playground's use.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Gram Panchayat illegal construction playground public amenities

Sunil Kumar v. State of U.P. & Anr.

· Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 INSC 668

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant arising from a trivial workplace altercation, holding that continuing such proceedings would amount to harassment and abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of chargesheet trivial offence harassment abuse of process

Paul Rubber Industries Private Limited v. Amit Chand Mitra & Anr.

· Aniruddha Bose; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that an unregistered lease deed for a term exceeding one year is inadmissible as evidence to determine lease duration and purpose, affirming that the tenancy was month-to-month requiring fifteen days' notice, and dismissed the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant unregistered lease deed Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Registration Act, 1908 lease for manufacturing purposes

Sweety Kumari v. State of Bihar and Others

· J. K. Maheshwari; K. V. Viswanathan

The Supreme Court held that non-production of original certificates at interview is not a mandatory ground for disqualification if true photocopies are submitted and directed the State to accommodate meritorious candidates by adjusting vacancies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Bihar Judicial Service Examination character certificate production of original documents eligibility vs proof

Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd. v. The Assessing Officer, Trivandrum

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank not carrying on banking business as defined under the Banking Regulation Act is not a "co-operative bank" under Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act and is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 80P Income Tax Act co-operative bank definition Banking Regulation Act 1949 NABARD Act 1981

Dr. Nirmal Singh Panesar v. Mrs. Paramjit Kaur Panesar

· Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi · 2023 SCC Online SC 544

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not an automatic ground for divorce under Article 142 and that the appellant failed to prove cruelty or desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) Section 13(1)(ib) Article 142 Constitution of India

C.I.T., DELHI v. BHARTI HEXACOM LTD

· B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2023 INSC 917

The Supreme Court held that the variable licence fee under the New Telecom Policy, 1999 is revenue expenditure deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, while the one-time licence fee paid up to 31 July 1999 is capital expenditure amortisable under Section 35ABB.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant variable licence fee New Telecom Policy 1999 capital expenditure revenue expenditure

UNIBROS v. ALL INDIA RADIO

· S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta · 2023 INSC 931
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s setting aside of an arbitral award for loss of profit due to lack of credible evidence, affirming that such awards must comply with the public policy of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant loss of profit Hudson’s formula arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act

Commissioner, Customs Central Excise and Service Tax, Patna v. M/s Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd.

· S. Ravindra Bhat; Dipankar Datta

The Supreme Court upheld that IIT Patna and NIT Rourkela qualify as governmental authorities exempt from service tax on construction services, dismissing Revenue's appeals and affirming refund claims by the contractor.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant governmental authority service tax exemption Mega Service Tax Exemption Notification construction services