Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Daljit Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.

02 Jan 2025 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 21
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that proclaimed offender status under Section 82 Cr.P.C. ceases upon acquittal in the main offence, and Section 174A IPC is a stand-alone offence that can continue independently but may be closed if the accused is acquitted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant proclaimed offender Section 82 Cr.P.C. Section 174A IPC non-appearance

Gopal Krishan v. Daulat Ram

02 Jan 2025 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 18
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that under Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, a Will is valid if attesting witnesses see the testator sign or affix his mark, without requiring proof that the act was done at the testator's direction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 63(c) Will execution attesting witness

The State, Central Bureau of Investigation v. A. Satish Kumar & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 11
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that CBI retains jurisdiction to investigate and try offences under the PC Act involving Central Government employees post-State bifurcation without fresh consent, setting aside the High Court's quashing of FIRs and proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant CBI jurisdiction Prevention of Corruption Act Delhi Special Police Establishment Act State bifurcation

Leela & Ors. v. Muruganantham & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 10

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a Will due to suspicious circumstances despite formal execution, affirming the plaintiffs' entitlement to partitioned shares in self-acquired property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will validity Indian Succession Act Section 63 Indian Evidence Act Section 68 suspicious circumstances

Ajay Singh v. Khacheru

02 Jan 2025 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 9
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot reappreciate concurrent findings of fact under Article 226 without perversity, restoring the classification of disputed land as Johad and upholding the cancellation of fictitious patta entries.

property appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction concurrent findings of fact reappreciation of evidence

M/S NARESH POTTERIES v. M/S AARTI INDUSTRIES

02 Jan 2025 · B.R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed by a duly authorized power of attorney holder with personal knowledge satisfies Section 142 requirements and quashing such complaint at threshold is unjustified.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 142 Negotiable Instruments Act power of attorney holder complaint filing

Kim Wansoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 8
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR against the appellant for lack of prima facie offence, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process and miscarriage of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashment of FIR Section 482 CrPC Article 226 Constitution abuse of process

Ram Lal v. Jarnail Singh

01 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 301
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that delay in depositing balance sale consideration does not render a decree for specific performance inexecutable if no rescission application is filed, affirming the executing court's discretion to allow deposit beyond stipulated time and setting aside the High Court's order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance balance sale consideration Section 28 Specific Relief Act doctrine of merger

Subhelal @ Sushil Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

01 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 242

The Supreme Court clarified that bail under Section 437(6) CrPC is discretionary and not absolute, and granted bail to the appellant in a cryptocurrency fraud case subject to conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 437(6) CrPC bail in non-bailable offence right to speedy trial discretionary bail

Union of India v. Kanhaiya Prasad

01 Jan 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 210
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for a money laundering accused for non-compliance with mandatory Section 45 PMLA conditions and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA bail conditions money laundering offence

Union of India v. Tarsem Singh

01 Jan 2025 · Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 146
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that its 2019 Tarsem Singh judgment granting 'solatium' and 'interest' to NHAI landowners applies retrospectively to acquisitions between 1997 and 2015, dismissing NHAI's plea for prospective application.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Solatium Interest Section 3J NHAI Act

Rajiv Ghosh v. Satya Naryan Jaiswal

01 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 467

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of the petitioner based on admissions and statutory tenancy limits under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, affirming the trial and High Court decrees passed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC admissions in pleadings West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act 1997 Section 2(g) tenancy rights

Rajeswari v. Shanmugam

01 Jan 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1329

The Supreme Court held that assignment of a decree for specific performance of sale of immovable property does not require registration under the Registration Act as such decree does not create any right, title or interest in the property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant decree for specific performance assignment of decree registration of assignment deed Section 17(1)(e) Registration Act

CMJ Foundation v. State of Meghalaya

31 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 211
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the appointment of the Chancellor without Visitor's approval was invalid and upheld the State's dissolution of CMJ University for mismanagement following due procedure under the CMJ University Act, 2009.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Chancellor appointment Visitor approval CMJ University Act 2009 Section 48 dissolution

GIRIYAPPA & ANR v. KAMALAMMA & ORS

20 Dec 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 1043

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act requires proof of a valid written contract and possession in part-performance, which the petitioners failed to establish.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 53A Transfer of Property Act part-performance sale agreement possession

Pandurang Vithal Kevne v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

20 Dec 2024 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 1051
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner’s frivolous and delayed second review petition challenging his removal from service, emphasizing deterrence against abuse of judicial process and imposing costs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay review petition abuse of judicial process frivolous litigation

Shambhu Debnath v. The State of Bihar

20 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 1032

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's grant of anticipatory bail in a murder case, emphasizing that such relief should not be granted mechanically in serious offences without proper consideration of the evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 302 IPC murder chargesheet

Mallavva and Anr. v. Kalsammanavara Kalamma

20 Dec 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 1021

The Supreme Court held that a suit for possession based on title amended at the appellate stage is governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and dismissed the appeal upholding the decree for possession and declaration of title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 58 Article 65 Possession

Bijoy Kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna

20 Dec 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 1024
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a company director signing a cheque on the company's account cannot be held liable under Section 138 NI Act unless the company is also prosecuted and convicted, affirming the principle of separate corporate personality and strict construction of criminal liability.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act drawer of cheque authorized signatory vicarious liability

China Development Bank v. Doha Bank Q.P.S.C.

20 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 1029
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a hypothecation deed containing an express covenant to pay shortfall amounts constitutes a contract of guarantee, making the lenders Financial Creditors under the IBC entitled to participate in the CIRP.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Financial Creditor Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Deed of Hypothecation Contract of Guarantee