Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

OMI @ OMKAR RATHORE & ANR v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR

03 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 27
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's summoning of petitioners under Section 319 CrPC despite a police closure report, affirming that strong evidence during trial can justify adding accused not originally charge-sheeted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning of accused closure report charge-sheet

Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. v. Mathias Oram

03 Jan 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 22
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Claims Commission cannot reopen finalized compensation cases, restricted its role to re-determining differential compensation for four villages under the R&R Act, and directed the High Court to decide pending challenges to the Commission's methodology, dismissing applications seeking extension or additional directions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Claims Commission land acquisition compensation rehabilitation and resettlement

SEROSOFT SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. DEXTER CAPITAL ADVISORS PVT. LTD.

03 Jan 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 26

The Supreme Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral proceedings is limited and set aside the High Court's order granting additional cross-examination time, affirming the Arbitral Tribunal's discretion and emphasizing judicial restraint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Tribunal Cross-examination Judicial interference Article 227

MOHAMMED ENTERPRISES (TANZANIA) LTD v. FAROOQ ALI KHAN

03 Jan 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; MANOJ MISRA · 2025 INSC 25
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with CIRP proceedings under Article 226 after delay and when alternate remedies under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code were available, restoring the approved resolution plan.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 Article 226 jurisdiction natural justice

Sri Mahesh v. Sangram & Ors

02 Jan 2025 · C. T. Ravikumar; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 14

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a sale deed executed by the adoptive mother before adoption but set aside the High Court's decision validating a gift deed lacking acceptance, affirming the adopted son's entitlement to certain properties under the doctrine of relation back.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant adoption doctrine of relation back Hindu Succession Act Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act

DINESH KUMAR MATHUR v. STATE OF M.P. & ANR.

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 16
Cites 0 · Cited by 36

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a Housing Board official, holding that prosecution without prior sanction and absent prima facie dishonest intent or breach of official duty is impermissible.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC public servant prosecution quashing of FIR official duty

Lilian Coelho & Ors. v. Myra Philomena Coalho

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sudhanshu Dhulia · 2025 INSC 7

The Supreme Court held that valid execution of a Will presumes but does not conclusively establish genuineness, requiring courts to consider suspicious circumstances before granting Letters of Administration, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will validity Letters of Administration Suspicious circumstances Testamentary capacity

Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division v. Mohd. Syeed Ather & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 5

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment allowing writ petitions challenging land resumption orders, holding that lands assigned under a policy prohibiting alienation cannot be treated as patta lands validated under tenancy laws, and remanded for fresh consideration.

property appeal_allowed Significant Assigned lands Prohibition of transfer Revised assignment policy Alienability

M/s Maxim India Integrated Circuit Design (P) Ltd. v. Andappa (D) By LRs & Ors

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 17
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order condoning delay and allowing a writ appeal based on non-disclosure of material facts and upheld the finality of tenancy petition orders under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay tenancy petition finality of orders non-disclosure of material facts

Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and Others v. Government of Karnataka and Others

02 Jan 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 3

The Supreme Court held that compensation for land acquisition must be based on the market value as on the date of preliminary notification, and only courts can shift this date in exceptional cases, setting aside an award that unilaterally postponed the date by the acquisition officer.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation preliminary notification market value

Sanjay Dutt & Ors v. The State of Haryana & Anr

02 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 34
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that company directors cannot be held vicariously liable under the Punjab Land Preservation Act without specific statutory provision and personal involvement, quashing the complaint against the appellants.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant vicarious liability Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 Section 4 PLPA Section 19 PLPA

Dalip Ram v. The State of Punjab & Ors

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 12
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that leasehold rights do not amount to quasi-permanent allotment or transfer under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, dismissing petitions challenging eviction from Shamlat deh lands vested in Gram Panchayats.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Shamlat deh Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 quasi-permanent allotment displaced person

Naresh Aneja v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr

02 Jan 2025 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 19
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant under Sections 354 and 506 IPC, holding no prima facie offence was made out and the High Court erred in refusing quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 354 IPC Section 506 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings

B. N. JOHN v. STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

02 Jan 2025 · B. V. NAGARATHNA; NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH · 2025 INSC 4

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 353 and 186 IPC for lack of valid cognizance and procedural compliance, emphasizing the necessity of a written complaint by a public servant before a Judicial Magistrate under Section 195 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC Section 186 IPC Section 353 IPC Cognizance

Jayshree Kanabar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 13
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for accused under MCOCA for improperly appreciating evidence at bail stage and remanded for fresh consideration strictly under Section 21(4) of MCOCA.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant MCOCA bail Section 21(4) MCOCA appreciation of evidence

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gagan Narang

02 Jan 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 2
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that a local authority like the Municipal Corporation of Delhi can file an application under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for tariff adoption of a Waste to Energy project, affirming the regulatory jurisdiction of the State Commission and setting aside the Appellate Tribunal's restrictive interpretation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 63 Section 86(1)(b) Waste to Energy project

Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit

02 Jan 2025 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 20
Cites 2 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, a gift deed made subject to a maintenance condition can be set aside if the transferee fails to provide basic amenities, and such provisions must be interpreted liberally to protect senior citizens.

family appeal_allowed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Section 23 Gift Deed Senior Citizens

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 & Anr. v. M/S. Jupiter Capital Pvt. Ltd.

02 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 38
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that reduction of share capital resulting in extinguishment of shareholder rights amounts to transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, allowing capital loss claims on such reduction.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 2(47) Income Tax Act capital gains tax reduction of share capital extinguishment of rights

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajani Sahoo & Ors.

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 6
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal and High Court's award of compensation relying on police reports and applying the preponderance of probabilities standard to determine negligence in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence FIR charge-sheet

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sonigra Juhi Uttamchand

02 Jan 2025 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 15

The Supreme Court upheld the enhanced compensation awarded for deaths in a motor accident, affirming mandatory deductions and income assessment principles while dismissing appeals for reduction or further enhancement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident compensation deduction of personal expenses assessment of income future prospects