Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Union of India

22 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 619

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in an NDPS case, holding that statements under Section 67 are inadmissible and that conviction requires proof of possession, transportation, or conspiracy with proper charges framed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 22(c) Section 29 Section 67 statement

Rajkaran Singh v. Union of India

22 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 621
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that employees managing the SSD Fund, despite being classified as temporary, are entitled to pensionary benefits under the 6th CPC as they possess characteristics of regular government servants, and denial of such benefits is arbitrary and unconstitutional.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant 6th Central Pay Commission SSD Fund Special Frontier Force pensionary benefits

Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur at Imphal & Anr

22 Aug 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; Sudhanshu Dhulia; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 647
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that executive resolutions cannot override statutory recruitment rules prescribing cumulative evaluation, and declared the petitioner successful for failing viva-voce cut-off introduced mid-process without notice.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant legitimate expectation statutory rules executive instructions viva-voce cut-off

Swati Priyadarshini v. State of Madhya Pradesh

22 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 620
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-extension of a contractual appointment carrying stigmatic consequences requires a regular enquiry under Article 311(2), and quashed the termination order for non-compliance with natural justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contractual termination stigmatic order Article 311(2) natural justice

Dinesh Sahu alias Dinnu v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

22 Aug 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 740

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder, affirming that concurrent findings based on credible evidence cannot be lightly disturbed despite hostile witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention hostile witnesses

Girish Gandhi v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

22 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 617

The Supreme Court allowed consolidation of sureties furnished in one FIR to cover multiple bail orders across States, relaxing onerous bail conditions to uphold the petitioner's fundamental right to liberty.

criminal petition_allowed Significant bail sureties personal bond Article 21

Indian Council of Agricultural Research v. Rajinder Singh

22 Aug 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 622

The Supreme Court held that technical personnel governed by distinct service rules are not entitled to advance increments granted to scientists upon acquiring a Ph.D., affirming reasonable classification under Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant advance increments Ph.D. qualification technical personnel scientists

State Project Director, UP Education for All Project Board v. Saroj Maurya

21 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 677

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order for lack of reasoned judgment and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, affirming the mandatory requirement of reasoned judicial decisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant reasoned judgment absence of reasons natural justice procedural law

Rekha Sharma v. Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur

21 Aug 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 615
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that no separate cut off marks are required for persons with benchmark disabilities under overall horizontal reservation, dismissing appeals challenging their non-disclosure in judicial service recruitment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Persons with benchmark disabilities Horizontal reservation Vertical reservation Cut off marks

State of West Bengal v. Accused

20 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 614
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the conviction of a man for aggravated sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, rejected the High Court’s acquittal based on irrelevant observations, and emphasized the State’s duty to protect and rehabilitate child victims.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act juvenile justice child sexual offence rape

ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA v. ORDER

20 Aug 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 613
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court mandated a National Task Force to formulate a national protocol ensuring safety and dignity of medical professionals following a brutal rape and murder incident, emphasizing systemic institutional reforms and compliance with sexual harassment laws.

criminal other Significant violence against medical professionals institutional safety sexual harassment Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013

Gautam Kumar Das v. NCT of Delhi and Others

20 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 610

The Supreme Court restored custody of a minor daughter to her biological father, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child and the father's status as natural guardian.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody dispute natural guardian minor child welfare Guardians and Wards Act

Ravi Agrawal v. Union of India & Another

20 Aug 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 648

The Supreme Court held that the amendment to Section 80DD of the Income Tax Act cannot be applied retrospectively to existing policies, dismissing the petition seeking such relief while upholding the prospective amendment made by Parliament.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 80DD Income Tax Act disability benefits retrospective amendment public interest litigation

Shabna Abdulla v. Union of India

20 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 612

The Supreme Court quashed a COFEPOSA detention order for non-supply of WhatsApp chat documents relied upon in the order, affirming the detenue's right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation and underscoring the binding nature of coordinate Bench decisions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant COFEPOSA preventive detention Article 22(5) Constitution of India non-supply of documents

Ramnaresh @ Rinku Kushwah and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

20 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 611
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that meritorious reserved category candidates must be admitted against unreserved Government School quota seats based on merit, quashing the State's restrictive reservation methodology and directing admission in the next academic session.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant horizontal reservation vertical reservation Government School quota meritorious reserved candidates

Hussainbhai Asgarali Lokhandwala v. State of Gujarat

14 Aug 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 609
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide not amounting to murder but modified the sentence to the period already served, recognizing the incident occurred in the heat of the moment without premeditation.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 304 IPC culpable homicide private defense matrimonial dispute

Maheshkumar Chandulal Patel & Anr. v. The State of Gujarat & Ors.

14 Aug 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 608
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Rule 21 of the Gujarat Civil Services Pay Rules, 2002, does not apply to pay anomalies arising from counting ad hoc service of juniors, and dismissed the appeal seeking pay stepping up for seniors appointed directly.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant stepping up of pay Rule 21 Gujarat Civil Services Pay Rules 2002 ad hoc service Career Advancement Scheme

Mineral Area Development Authority v. M/S Steel Authority of India

14 Aug 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy; Abhay S Oka; J... · 2024 INSC 607
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the MADA judgment overruling India Cement applies retrospectively to uphold state taxation powers on minerals, but imposed equitable conditions to mitigate hardship on assesses.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant prospective overruling retrospective effect taxation powers Entries 49 and 50 List II

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA

13 Aug 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 605
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held Patanjali Ayurved and its representatives guilty of wilful breach of undertaking and misleading advertisements amounting to civil contempt, emphasizing strict adherence to court orders and statutory provisions.

constitutional other Significant contempt of court wilful disobedience undertaking to court misleading advertisements

James Kunjwal v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 601
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that mere denial in affidavits does not constitute perjury under Section 193 IPC and set aside the High Court's direction to prosecute the appellant for filing a false affidavit.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant perjury false affidavit Section 193 IPC Section 191 IPC