Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

R.P. GARG v. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER

10 Sep 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 743

The Supreme Court held that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is mandatory and cannot be excluded by contract, allowing the appellant's claim for interest on the arbitral award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant post-award interest Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7)(b) contractual prohibition

Khursheed & Anr. v. Shaqoor

10 Sep 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 764

The Supreme Court held that suits for cancellation of voidable sale deeds executed by fraud do not abate under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act and Civil Courts retain jurisdiction despite consolidation proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 Section 5(2)(a) Section 49 voidable document

Manilal v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors

10 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 675

The Supreme Court held that candidates admitted to B.Ed courses before 29.07.2011 are exempt from minimum graduation percentage criteria for teacher recruitment, and directed regularization of the appellant’s appointment, emphasizing non-discrimination under Article 14.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Teacher recruitment Minimum percentage marks Bachelor of Education admission NCTE notification

S VIJIKUMARI v. MOWNESHWARACHARI C

10 Sep 2024 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 732

The Supreme Court held that alteration or revocation of maintenance orders under Section 25(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 applies only prospectively upon change in circumstances and cannot set aside final orders or refund maintenance already paid.

family appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 25(2) maintenance order alteration modification revocation

Raghuveer Sharan v. District Sahakari Krishi Gramin Vikas Bank

10 Sep 2024 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 681

The Supreme Court held that a witness who makes self-incriminating statements under compulsion has only qualified immunity under Section 132 of the Evidence Act and can be summoned as an accused under Section 319 CrPC if independent incriminating evidence exists.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 132 Indian Evidence Act Section 319 CrPC self-incrimination witness immunity

SK. GOLAM LALCHAND v. NANDU LAL SHAW

10 Sep 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 676

A co-owner cannot transfer entire joint property without partition; sale by one co-owner binds only to his share, and injunctions protect co-owners' rights until partition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint ownership partition sale deed co-owner

Dhanraj Aswani v. Amar S. Mulchandani

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 669
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a person already in custody in one case can maintain an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in a different case, with the bail becoming effective only upon arrest in the subsequent case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC maintainability custody

Sikha Ghosh & Others v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 697
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court disposed of a Special Leave Petition concerning eviction by consent, holding that disputed factual issues are not suitable for writ jurisdiction and directing vacant possession by a specified date with mutual settlement of claims.

civil appeal_allowed writ petition eviction vacant possession disputed questions of fact

Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 674
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking to halt arms exports to Israel, holding that foreign policy decisions lie exclusively with the Union Government and are not subject to judicial intervention under Article 32.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 32 Constitution foreign policy arms export judicial restraint

Sahil Bhargava & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 699

The Supreme Court granted interim relief allowing medical students to retrieve original documents upon partial fee deposit and undertaking during pendency of fee fixation disputes under Uttarakhand law.

education appeal_allowed Significant fee fixation unaided private professional educational institutions interim relief original documents

Union of India v. Lt. Col. Rahul Arora

09 Sep 2024 · Prashant Kumar Mishra; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 672

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of Court Martial proceedings due to the defective appointment of a junior Judge Advocate without recorded non-availability of a senior officer, reaffirming the strict procedural safeguards under military law.

military_law appeal_dismissed Significant Judge Advocate Court Martial Army Act Army Rules

Chalasani Udaya Shankar v. M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

09 Sep 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 671
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the NCLT and NCLAT dismissals of a rectification petition under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013, restoring the case for fresh consideration after proper evidence appraisal.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 2013 Section 59 Rectification of Register of Members Share transfer dispute

Cox & Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

09 Sep 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 670
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Supreme Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, only prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed an arbitrator, leaving complex jurisdictional issues including joinder of non-signatories to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 16 Group of Companies doctrine

M/s SITARAM ENTERPRISES v. PRITHVIRAJ VARDICHAND JAIN

09 Sep 2024 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 685

The Supreme Court held the tenant guilty of contempt for willful non-compliance of eviction orders, granted a final one-week extension to vacate, and authorized forcible possession with costs recoverable from the contemnor.

civil petition_allowed Significant contempt of court willful disobedience eviction Supreme Court order

Suhas Chakma v. Union of India

09 Sep 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 813
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court affirmed the fundamental right of prisoners to free and effective legal aid under Article 21 and issued comprehensive directions to strengthen legal aid mechanisms and ensure access to justice for all prisoners.

criminal petition_allowed Significant free legal aid prisoners' rights Article 21 Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Dharmendra Sharma v. Agra Development Authority

06 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 667

The Supreme Court held that possession offered without mandatory completion and firefighting certificates is invalid, extended limitation due to part payments, affirmed NCDRC's jurisdiction, and awarded refund with interest plus additional compensation to the purchaser.

civil appeal_allowed Significant offer of possession completion certificate firefighting clearance certificate Consumer Protection Act, 1986

ANANTDEEP SINGH v. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

06 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 673

The Supreme Court directed reinstatement of a judicial officer whose termination during probation was set aside, awarding back wages and emphasizing that termination orders cannot be retrospective and must comply with Court directions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant termination of service probationer reinstatement back wages

Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

06 Sep 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 662
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that immunity granted by the Settlement Commission bars prosecution where proceedings have not been instituted prior, and quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant-company for alleged CVD evasion based on MRP.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant immunity Settlement Commission Countervailing Duty Maximum Retail Price

RICARDO CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. v. RAVI KUCKIAN & OTHERS

06 Sep 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 715

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to file a written statement after the limitation period expired, holding that limitation starts from receipt of notice accompanied by complaint and that denial of complaint copy service violates fair hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act written statement limitation period service of complaint

Mandakini Diwan and Anr. v. High Court of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale · 2024 INSC 666

The Supreme Court directed a CBI investigation into the suspicious death of Ms. Ranjana Diwan, emphasizing the need for an independent inquiry where bias or influence is alleged to ensure a fair investigation and uphold fundamental rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. fair investigation influence and bias