Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

The State of West Bengal & Ors. v. PAM Developments Private Limited & Anr.

09 Jan 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 69

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order allowing amendment of plaint to include subsequent debarment orders as part of a continuous cause of action, dispensing with Section 80 CPC notice and rejecting limitation objections.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant continuous cause of action amendment of plaint Section 80 CPC notice debarment order

Goverdhan & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

09 Jan 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 47

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative evidence, dismissing their appeal against concurrent findings of the lower courts.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant concurrent findings reasonable doubt eyewitness testimony FIR

Inspector, Railway Protection Force v. Mathew K Cherian; J. Ramesh v. Union of India

09 Jan 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 51

The Supreme Court held that unauthorised procurement and supply of railway e-tickets using fraudulent user IDs constitutes an offence under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989, but authorised agents cannot be prosecuted under this section for unauthorised actions, which are subject to civil remedies.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 143 Railways Act unauthorised ticket procurement e-ticketing multiple user IDs

VIJAY PRABHU v. S.T. LAJAPATHIE

08 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 52

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of specific performance claim under Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, holding that a party not ready and willing to perform and not having paid full consideration cannot claim partial specific performance.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 12 Specific performance Part performance

Haldhar Prasad Gupta v. Deepak Kumar & Ors.

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 68

The Supreme Court directed university authorities to adjudicate the petitioner’s claims for salary arrears and pension following absorption, emphasizing fact-finding enquiry and administrative resolution rather than court adjudication.

administrative other Significant absorption salary arrears pension stoppage fact-finding enquiry

Om Prakash @ Israel @ Raju @ Raju Das v. Union of India & Anr.

08 Jan 2025 · M. M. Sundresh; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 43
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the plea of juvenility can be raised at any stage and must be adjudicated following statutory procedure, directing immediate release of the appellant who was a juvenile at the time of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice plea of juvenility Section 9(2) Juvenile Justice Act 2015 parens patriae

INDIAN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH TRUST ASSOCIATION v. SRI BALA & CO.

08 Jan 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 42

The Supreme Court held that a second suit for specific performance filed beyond three years from rejection of the earlier plaint is barred by limitation and liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Order VII Rule 13 CPC Limitation Act 1963 Article 54 Limitation Act

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bansal Wood Products Pvt. Ltd.

08 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 39

The Supreme Court upheld the exclusion of delay under Section 14 of the Limitation Act for arbitration claims following consumer complaint proceedings and directed payment of interest on delayed insurance claim from the date the claim was held within limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act Section 14 Arbitration Interest on delayed payment

S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 45
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court directed the Central Government to urgently frame and implement a statutory scheme for cashless treatment of motor accident victims during the golden hour to uphold the right to life under Article 21.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant cashless treatment golden hour motor vehicle accident Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Meera Singh v. Deepak Kumar

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 65

The Supreme Court held that disputes over salary arrears and pension entitlement following absorption require adjudication through enquiry and reasoned orders, not contempt proceedings, and directed university authorities to decide the claims accordingly.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant absorption salary arrears pension stoppage contempt petition

DHIRENDRA KUMAR v. DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 60

The Supreme Court held that claims for salary and pension arrears of absorbed employees require fact-finding enquiries by university authorities and cannot be adjudicated in contempt proceedings, disposing of the petitions with directions for such adjudication.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition arrears of salary pension entitlement absorption of employees

BAIDYA NATH CHOUDHARY v. DR. SREE SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 74

The Supreme Court directed a fact-finding enquiry to adjudicate the petitioner's claims of salary arrears and pension following absorption, dismissing the contempt petition for non-compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant absorption salary arrears pension entitlement fact-finding enquiry

Dr. Shyam Narayan Singh v. Sanjay Kumar

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 66

The Supreme Court directed a fact-finding enquiry and administrative adjudication for payment of salary arrears and pension to absorbed employees, dismissing the contempt petition challenging interim withholding of dues.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant absorption arrears of salary pension fact-finding enquiry

H. Guruswamy & Ors. v. A. Krishnaiah Since Deceased by Lrs.

08 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 53
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order condoning a six-year delay in recalling a suit dismissed as abated, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws and res judicata principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay law of limitation res judicata application for recall

Anraj Devi v. Deepak Kumar

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 64

The Supreme Court directed Magadh University to adjudicate and pay family pension and post-retiral benefits to the petitioner’s deceased husband’s family in compliance with its earlier absorption order, disposing of the contempt petition with procedural directions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition absorption family pension post-retiral benefits

Dr. Yugeshwar Yadav v. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 61

The Supreme Court directed a fact-finding enquiry to adjudicate disputed claims of salary arrears and pension following absorption into service, holding that interim withholding of payments pending enquiry does not amount to contempt.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant absorption into service arrears of salary pension claim contempt petition

PRASHANT BANDYOPADHYAY & ANR v. SUDHIR TRIPATHI & ORS

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 63

The Supreme Court disposed of the contempt petition directing adjudication of salary arrears and pension claims through due enquiry, dismissing the petition for non-compliance due to incomplete joinder and unresolved claims prior to State bifurcation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court salary arrears pension entitlement State bifurcation

Gopal Sharan Singh v. Deepak Kumar

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 59

The Supreme Court directed administrative enquiry into disputed salary arrears and pension claims following absorption orders, dismissing contempt petitions for non-compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant absorption salary arrears pension contempt petition

Dinesh Kumar Singh and Anr. v. R. K. Mahajan and Ors.

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 58

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions alleging non-compliance of its order, holding that the commission’s direction to consider candidates for absorption did not mandate positive absorption and no willful disobedience was established.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt petition absorption One Man Commission J. Sinha Commission

SRI MUNSHI LAL MAHTO v. SRI SUDHIR TRIPATHY

08 Jan 2025 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 62

The Supreme Court held that disputes over appointment validity, pay fixation, and arrears cannot be adjudicated in contempt proceedings and must be resolved through proper administrative and judicial processes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition absorption pay fixation date of birth