Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Siddhant @ Sidharth Balu Taktode v. The State of Maharashtra

18 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 1017
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court allowed bail to an accused under MCOCA due to prolonged trial delay violating the right to speedy trial, imposing stringent conditions to balance interests of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 bail right to speedy trial Articles 19 and 21

Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem v. M/s. Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd.

18 Dec 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 1002

The Supreme Court held that pure coconut oil sold in small quantities is classifiable as edible oil under Heading 1513 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, unless packaging clearly indicates it is intended as hair oil under Heading 3305.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant coconut oil tariff classification Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 Heading 1513

Pawapuri Rice Mills v. Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.

18 Dec 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 999

The Supreme Court upheld recovery proceedings under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act against rice millers for undelivered Custom Milled Rice, affirming the claim as a public demand and emphasizing exhaustion of statutory remedies before writ jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant public demand Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 Custom Milled Rice nodal agency

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

18 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; S.V.N. Bhatti; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 997
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court directed Rajasthan to legally recognize and protect sacred groves (Orans) as forest lands under the Forest Conservation Act, ensuring community involvement and compliance with statutory and international conservation mandates.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Sacred groves Orans Forest Conservation Act, 1980 Community forest rights

Rajesh Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

17 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 993
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that the National Commission exceeded its revisional jurisdiction in reducing the insurance claim and restored the full insured amount payable to the appellant, emphasizing limited revisional powers and strict interpretation of exclusion clauses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Revisional jurisdiction Insurance claim Delay in intimation

Rajendra Kumar Barjatya and Another v. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad & Ors.

17 Dec 2024 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 990
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld demolition of unauthorized commercial constructions on residential land despite delay and third-party ownership, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory provisions and procedural safeguards.

property appeal_dismissed Significant unauthorized construction demolition natural justice U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. M/S. S.A. BUILDERS LTD

17 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 988
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld that compound interest is payable under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act, affirmed the arbitrator's jurisdiction to clarify the award, and directed execution in accordance with M/s. Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd., overruling S.L. Arora.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7) post-award interest compound interest

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Suresh Chandra Tewari

17 Dec 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 989

The Supreme Court held that a family settlement or partition executed after the statutory cut-off date cannot be recognized to avoid land ceiling, and once finality is attained, the matter cannot be reopened, allowing the State to take possession of surplus land.

property appeal_allowed Significant land ceiling family settlement partition res judicata

Ayub Khan v. State of Rajasthan

17 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 994

The Supreme Court held that High Court directions mandating a specific format for recording antecedents in bail orders are not binding, non-compliance does not amount to judicial indiscipline, and adverse personal remarks against judicial officers in judicial orders must be avoided.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail application judicial discretion antecedents judicial indiscipline

Deepti Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

17 Dec 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 991

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's order restoring the appellant's maintenance petition and directing fresh adjudication by the Family Court.

family appeal_dismissed Section 125 CrPC Section 482 CrPC Family Court maintenance

Athar Parwez v. Union of India

17 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 995
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant charged under UAPA, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention and lack of prima facie evidence justify bail despite statutory restrictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail under UAPA Section 43-D(5) UAPA right to speedy trial Article 21 Constitution of India

S. GUNASEKARAN v. THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT

17 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 1018
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court modified an excessive penalty imposed on a medical admission candidate who resigned within the original prospectus period amid confusing amendments, balancing contributory negligence and institutional responsibility.

civil appeal_allowed Admission process Prospectus amendment Exit with forfeiture Resignation rights

ANKUSH VIPAN KAPOOR v. UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

16 Dec 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 986

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government’s transfer of investigation to the NIA under the NIA Act for connected offences involving narcotics and terrorism, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge and bail cancellation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 Section 6(5) NIA Act Section 8 NIA Act Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967

Bharti Arora v. State of Haryana

13 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 976
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed adverse findings and proceedings against a police officer under Section 58 of the NDPS Act for lack of jurisdiction, violation of natural justice, and held that such offences must be tried summarily by a Magistrate.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 58 NDPS Act summary trial natural justice

Union of India v. Rohit Nandan

13 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 984

The Supreme Court held that the State Government's notification merging the Tanti caste with Scheduled Castes without parliamentary approval is illegal, denying the respondent Scheduled Caste status and benefits, and set aside his promotion based on that status.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Caste Other Backward Classes Article 341 State Government notification

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Vivek V. Gawde

13 Dec 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 985
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by framing issues in summary eviction proceedings under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, affirming limited writ jurisdiction over civil court orders and upholding the quasi-judicial independence of the Inquiry Officer.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant eviction proceedings Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Inquiry Officer writ jurisdiction

Om Prakash Yadav v. Niranjan Kumar Upadhyay & Ors.

13 Dec 2024 · J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 979
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that prosecution of public servants requires sanction under Section 197 CrPC only if the offence was committed while acting in official duty, and quashing of proceedings for lack of sanction was improper where the acts alleged were criminal conspiracies outside official duty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC sanction for prosecution public servant official duty

GEORGE v. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

13 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 974

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction under murder charges, holding that conviction based solely on the inconsistent testimony of an interested witness is impermissible and acquitted him.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sole testimony interested witness benefit of doubt concurrent findings

Indore Development Authority v. Dr. Hemant Mandovra

13 Dec 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 983

The Supreme Court set aside consumer forum orders directing possession after 28 years of default, holding that fresh tender or auction must be followed for allotment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant allotment cancellation consumer protection interim order possession

CELIR LLP v. SUMATI PRASAD BAFNA

13 Dec 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 978
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a SARFAESI Act auction, set aside a High Court redemption order, directed issuance of sale certificate to the successful bidder, and held that obstructing possession and title transfer post-judgment may constitute contempt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act auction validity sale certificate physical possession