Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Manish Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

22 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 151
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that consensual sexual relations based on a promise to marry do not constitute rape absent proof of mala fide intent, quashing the appellant's summoning order under IPC and SC/ST Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent promise to marry rape Section 376 IPC

Surendra G. Shankar & Anr. v. Esque Finamark Pvt. Ltd & Ors.

22 Jan 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 102

The Supreme Court held that delay in filing appeals before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal should have been condoned and restored the appeals for merits, clarifying that appellate courts must not decide merits when ruling on delay condonation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Real Estate Regulatory Authority appeal limitation appellate jurisdiction

Thammaraya and Another v. State of Karnataka

22 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 108
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove disclosure statements and recoveries as per law, highlighting strict adherence to principles governing circumstantial evidence and Section 27 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence disclosure statement Section 27 Indian Evidence Act Test Identification Parade

Baban Shankar Daphal & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

22 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 97
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence, rejecting acquittal due to minor inconsistencies and affirming that related witnesses' evidence must be carefully scrutinized but not discarded.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness testimony related witnesses medical evidence Section 302 IPC

RUHI AGRAWAL & ANR. v. NIMISH S. AGRAWAL

22 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 99

The Supreme Court upheld expanded visitation rights for the father with interim supervision by a female court-appointed Commissioner, balancing the child's welfare with parental involvement during custody litigation.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody visitation rights best interest of the child court-appointed commissioner

M/s Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Another

22 Jan 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 91

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether writ petitions are maintainable against orders of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council under the MSMED Act and the scope of writ jurisdiction vis-à-vis statutory arbitration remedies.

civil other Significant Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council MSMED Act Section 18 MSMED Act Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Mohd. Tahir Hussain v. State of NCT of Delhi

22 Jan 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 100
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that interim bail cannot be granted solely for election campaigning, but allowed limited interim bail for filing nomination, with a split verdict on bail for campaigning.

criminal other Significant interim bail election campaigning right to contest elections Section 62(5) Representation of People Act

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT v. SUBHASH SHARMA

21 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 141
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld bail granted due to illegal arrest violating Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 57 Cr.P.C, emphasizing mandatory production before Magistrate within 24 hours in PMLA cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Article 22(2) Constitution of India Section 57 Cr.P.C Prevention of Money Laundering Act illegal arrest

Laxmi Das v. State of West Bengal

21 Jan 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 86

The Supreme Court held that mere disapproval or insult does not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC and quashed charges against the appellant for lack of proximate instigation or mens rea.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC instigation mens rea

VIPIN KUMAR v. JAYDEEP & OTHERS

21 Jan 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 169

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court judgment allowing a second appeal without framing substantial questions of law and without proper notice, restoring the appeal for fresh hearing due to procedural irregularities and allegations of fraud.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Second Appeal Section 100 CPC Substantial Question of Law Service of Notice

State of Jharkhand v. Dr. Nishkant Dubey & Ors.

21 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 94

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of an FIR against MPs for alleged unlawful entry and coercion at an airport, holding that the Aircraft Act, 1934 prescribes exclusive procedures barring police investigation without prior sanction and that IPC offences were not made out.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Aircraft Act 1934 Section 12B Aircraft Act quashing FIR criminal trespass IPC

State of Punjab v. M/S Om Prakash Brick

21 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 88

The Supreme Court held that the State Government is entitled to levy royalty on brick earth declared as a minor mineral under the 1957 Act and Mineral Rules irrespective of land ownership, and civil suits restraining such levy are not maintainable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant minor minerals royalty levy Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964

The General Manager Personnel Syndicate Bank & Ors v. B S N Prasad

21 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 89
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the disciplinary finding of misconduct against a bank branch manager but modified the dismissal penalty to a minor penalty, emphasizing the lower standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings and the need for proportionality.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry bank officer misconduct standard of proof natural justice

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Nashik Commissionerate

20 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2025 INSC 84
Cites 4 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the price fixed under the MOU between Oil Marketing Companies was not the sole consideration for sale under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, and the extended period of limitation and penalty could not be invoked without proof of suppression or fraud.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 transaction value Import Parity Price extended period of limitation

Bhupinderpal Singh Gill v. State of Punjab

20 Jan 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 83

The Supreme Court set aside a disciplinary penalty cutting pension of a senior medical officer, holding the findings unsupported by legal evidence and the punishment disproportionate, emphasizing procedural fairness and judicial review limits in disciplinary cases.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings public servant natural justice judicial review

Jyostnamayee Mishra v. State of Odisha

20 Jan 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 87
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the post of Tracer is to be filled exclusively by direct recruitment as per statutory rules, dismissed the petitioner's claim for promotion from Peon, and emphasized strict adherence to recruitment procedures and the illegality of appointments made in violation thereof.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant direct recruitment promotion Orissa Subordinate Architectural Service Rules, 1979 Article 14

U. SUDHEERA & OTHERS v. C. YASHODA & OTHERS

17 Jan 2025 · R. Mahadevan; J. B. Pardiwala · 2025 INSC 80

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot grant interim relief in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC without first framing substantial question(s) of law, setting aside the impugned interim order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Second Appeal Section 100 CPC Substantial Question of Law Interim Order

SUNKARI TIRUMALA RAO v. PENKI ARUNA KUMARI

17 Jan 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 92

The Supreme Court held that a suit for recovery of money filed by partners of an unregistered partnership firm against another partner is barred under Section 69(1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 and is not maintainable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 69 Indian Partnership Act unregistered partnership maintainability of suit recovery of money

The State of Jharkhand & Others v. Vikash Tiwary

17 Jan 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 79

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful intra-State transfer of a life convict prisoner by prison authorities on administrative grounds, setting aside the High Court's quashing of the transfer order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant prisoner transfer intra-State transfer Prisoners Act 1900 Inspector General of Prisons

Surendra Kumar Jain v. Santobai & Another

17 Jan 2025 · M. M. Sundresh; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 230
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order condoning a 2,422-day delay in restoring an appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, holding that unexplained inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause warrant dismissal of the restoration application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Order XLI Rule 19 CPC restoration of appeal sufficient cause