Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Woodland (Aero Club) Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Ambience Commercial Developers Pvt. Ltd.

02 Dec 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10649-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The High Court set aside an arbitral award for lack of jurisdiction and invalid unilateral appointment of the arbitrator, holding that arbitration against a non-signatory party is invalid and such awards are nullities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement unilateral appointment arbitrator eligibility Section 12(5) Arbitration Act

Novo Nordisk A/S v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited & Anr.

02 Dec 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:10820

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction application, holding that the defendants raised a credible challenge to the validity of the Semaglutide patent based on anticipation by prior claiming in an earlier genus patent.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant Patent Infringement Interim Injunction Anticipation Prior Claiming

Kamal Pathak & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

02 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10772

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, 34 IPC and DV Act on the basis of an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

GENERAL @ RAJA @ JUNDEL v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

02 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10781

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape, robbery, and criminal intimidation, holding that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through consistent testimony and corroborative medical and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape consent DNA evidence medical evidence

Mahesh Chugh v. State of NCT of Delhi

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10743
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant accused of alleged corporate fraud involving share dilution, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the delay in FIR, cooperation with investigation, and the primarily civil nature of the dispute.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant pre-arrest bail anticipatory bail share dilution corporate fraud

Vedanta Limited v. The Nominated Authority Ministry of Coal Government of India & Ors.

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:10744

The Delhi High Court upheld the appropriation of performance bank guarantee for delay in milestone compliance under the Coal Mines Development Agreement, dismissing the writ petition for non-exhaustion of alternate remedy and affirming the contractual and statutory framework governing mining clearances and penalties.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 Performance Bank Guarantee Milestone deadlines Environment Clearance

Ganraj Enterprises v. Landmark Crafts Ltd

02 Dec 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:10774

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a rectification petition challenging a trademark registration, holding that territorial restrictions on one registration do not apply to another and that prior use and proprietary rights were established.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 rectification petition territorial limitation prior user claim

Mr. Kanti Tiwari v. M/S INDO ALUSYS INDUSTRIES LTD

02 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10741

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to admit belated documents in a money recovery suit due to unexplained delay and potential prejudice to the plaintiff.

civil petition_dismissed Order VIII Rule 1A CPC delay in filing documents money recovery suit due diligence

State v. Ravinder @ Kuku & Anr.

02 Dec 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10742-DB

The High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, lack of corroborative evidence, and procedural lapses in the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sole eyewitness benefit of doubt acquittal manifest illegality

VSA Trading Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner CGST and Anr

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10771-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand for fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, emphasizing that writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily available in such complex tax disputes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 Section 107 CGST Article 226 Constitution

M/S A V Metals Marketing Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner CGST and Anr

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10770-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST demand order for fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to avail the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 Section 107 CGST writ jurisdiction

Inder Bahadur Singh v. Additional Commissioner Ward

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10736-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order on fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 fraudulent availment writ jurisdiction

Manpar Exim Inc v. Additional Director, DGGI and Ors.

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10737-DB

The Delhi High Court held that post-amendment, pre-Show Cause Notice consultation under GST Rules is discretionary, writ petitions are not maintainable in fraudulent ITC cases, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit GST Rules 2017 Rule 142(1A) Pre-SCN consultation notice

Aggarwal Traders v. Sales Tax Officer Class II / Avato, Ward 102, Zone 9 & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10735-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST tax demand order but granted liberty to file a delayed appeal with pre-deposit, pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related GST notifications.

tax petition_dismissed Significant GST Act Section 168A Show Cause Notice Appeal limitation

HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED & ANR. v. CAWELS ELECTRIC PRIVATE LIMITED

01 Dec 2025 · Tejas Karia, J. · 2025:DHC:11704

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's well-known 'HAVELLS' trademark, finding a likelihood of confusion and infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Deceptive similarity Well-known mark

Smt. Vandana Rana v. Sh. Bal Singh Rana & Ors.

01 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:11531

The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiff's pre-trial amendment application to challenge a fraudulently procured 2008 Will and mutation of agricultural land, emphasizing a liberal approach under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for effective adjudication of inheritance disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC inheritance dispute challenge to Will

Harish Kumar v. MD Tufail @ Rahees

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10890

The High Court upheld the discharge of accused in a rape and criminal intimidation case due to inconsistencies, delay, and lack of grave suspicion at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant charge framing discharge Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

Riya Sekhawat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Dec 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:11056

The Delhi High Court upheld the National Medical Commission's requirement that foreign medical graduates affected by the Russia-Ukraine war must undergo two years of clinical clerkship plus one year internship in India, rejecting their challenge that this was arbitrary and contrary to statutory regulations.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Foreign Medical Graduates Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship Clinical Training National Medical Commission

Deepesh Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10700

The Delhi High Court held that while the FIR and complaint under the Wildlife Act were valid and the search lawful, the petitioner was discharged due to lack of proof that he was responsible for the school’s management, and no double jeopardy arose from FIR and complaint proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 Section 50 search and seizure Section 55 complaint double jeopardy

Rajat Dwivedi v. Union of India

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10785-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a Tribunal's adjournment order, holding that certiorari jurisdiction does not extend to supervising procedural adjournments or delays in constitution of Larger Benches.

administrative petition_dismissed certiorari jurisdiction adjournment order Larger Bench Tribunal