Delhi High Court

29,474 judgments

Year:

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 v. M/S Mirage Homes Ltd.

01 Dec 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10707-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal holding that reassessment under Section 153A is invalid without incriminating material found during search, affirming Supreme Court precedent.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act incriminating material reassessment jurisdiction search and seizure

DOLF LEASING LTD v. ACIT CIRCLE 7 1 DELHI AND ORS.

01 Dec 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; MINI PUSHKARNA · 2025:DHC:10705-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court directed the CIT (Appeals) to decide the limitation issue on reassessment proceedings as a preliminary matter and stayed further related proceedings pending such decision.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 reassessment limitation Section 147

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 v. M/s Avery Dennison (India) Pvt. Ltd.

01 Dec 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10704-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the ITAT's deletion of transfer pricing additions for intra-group services based on consistent prior rulings and lack of cogent contrary evidence.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A Transfer Pricing Officer Intra-group services

Union of India v. Ex Sgt Rajesh Kumar Pandey

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming that the employer must prove non-attribution to service and limiting certiorari interference to legal errors only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Primary Hypertension Release Medical Board

Anuj Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10760-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition containing factual inaccuracies with liberty to reinstitute it.

other other petition withdrawal factual inaccuracies reinstitution liberty to reinstitute

Union of India & Ors. v. Major Anish Muralidhar v. JC-450695X Ex Sub Yadav Narendra Kumar Ramsumer

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for coronary artery disease, affirming the presumption that disease arising during service is attributable to military service unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces coronary artery disease attributability

Union of India and Ors. v. Yogesh Jain

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are service-related and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Narender Kumar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10746
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 528 BNSS

Deepanshu Khandelwal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10745

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers Section 528 BNSS

Mata Shanti Devi Mandir Trust v. Seema Gupta

01 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10768

The Delhi High Court directed maintenance of status quo on disputed trust property pending trial court's decision on interim injunction application, emphasizing the need for exceptional circumstances for ex parte injunctions.

civil appeal_allowed interim injunction Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC status quo fiduciary capacity

Lavay N Kumar v. State GNCT of Delhi and Ors

01 Dec 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10713-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a major woman who voluntarily married another person, holding no wrongful detention existed.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus wrongful detention majority free will

Pradeep Kumar Goyal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10779

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court-appointed Judicial Committee for challenges to sealing orders under Section 345-A of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, dismissing the writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Section 345-A Judicial Committee M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

Shri Hardeep Singh Hanspal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10778
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a serial litigant for unauthorized construction, holding that misuse of the Court’s process with oblique motives warrants dismissal with costs.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ petition abuse of process unauthorized construction clean hands doctrine

Lancers Convent Sr Sec School v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10777

The court held that installation of security gates in public lanes requires prior permission and a No Objection Certificate from Delhi Traffic Police, directing authorities to consider the petitioner's representation in accordance with MCD guidelines.

administrative petition_dismissed Municipal Corporation of Delhi No Objection Certificate Delhi Traffic Police installation of gates

M/S SHRI RAM ASSOCIATES v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10780

Delhi High Court grants a seven-month extension of a catering stall license at Shridham Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and applying judicial parity with prior similar orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition license extension Indian Railways Catering Policy 2017 territorial jurisdiction

WG CDR Eswara Raghuraj (Retd) v. Union of India and Others

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10767-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, holding that absence of explicit alternate cause by medical boards presumes service-attributability.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension primary hypertension Release Medical Board service-attributability

Prem Pal Singh v. The State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10730
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC inherent powers of High Court matrimonial dispute

Lalit Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10731

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable matrimonial settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS non-compoundable offences

M/S OMAXE LIMITED v. Dr. Madhu Gupta

01 Dec 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10722-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 34 petition as barred by limitation, restoring proceedings for fresh consideration of condonation of delay under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Limitation period Condonation of delay

Ayaz Ahmad @ Javed v. The State NCT of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10729

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a fraud and forgery case after investigation completion, emphasizing that bail is not punitive and imposing conditions to ensure trial attendance.

criminal appeal_allowed bail forged diploma referral to pathological laboratory Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC