Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Dinesh Kumar v. High Court of Delhi

28 Sep 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:3949-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of revised merit lists following limited re-evaluation of answer sheets, refusing to disturb the seniority and appointments of candidates selected under the original merit list.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant re-evaluation merit list seniority Private Secretary Examination

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Marubeni Itochu Steel India Pvt. Ltd.

28 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4055-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the income tax appeal challenging the ITAT order on ALP determination, adhering to its own precedents pending Supreme Court adjudication.

tax appeal_dismissed Arm's Length Price Free on Board value Income Tax Appellate Tribunal International Transaction

Pooja Dubey v. Manish Kumar

28 Sep 2022 · Siddharth Mridul; Amit Sharma · 2022:DHC:3933-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree for restitution of conjugal rights, holding the marriage valid and the appellant's withdrawal without reasonable excuse unjustified.

family appeal_dismissed Significant restitution of conjugal rights Section 9 Hindu Marriage Act validity of marriage reasonable excuse

Dr. D. Srinivas Rajesh v. Union of India; Dr. Ashutosh Bajpai v. Union of India

28 Sep 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4019-DB

The Delhi High Court directed promotion of petitioners to DIG (Medical) rank, holding that only relevant period's service records govern promotion eligibility, excluding prior allegations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion Departmental Promotion Committee Annual Confidential Report extraneous considerations

Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

28 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4084-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to decide pending rectification applications and grant refunds with interest in compliance with the Tribunal's order for assessment year 2012-13.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Tribunal rectification application appeal effect order income tax refund

Kusum Gupta v. ITO Ward 70(1)

28 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4027-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a reassessment notice and order for AY 2013-14 due to non-provision of investigation material to the assessee, directing fresh proceedings with opportunity to respond.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 notice reassessment limitation period

Priyanka Agarwal v. Union Public Service Commission and Anr.

28 Sep 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4078-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging non-selection for a Medical Physicist post, holding that failure to fulfill the mandatory internship prescribed in the recruitment notice disqualifies the candidate.

administrative petition_dismissed essential qualifications internship requirement recruitment advertisement eligibility criteria

Swaran Chopra v. The Nainital Bank Ltd.

28 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4026-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an attachment order against a son cannot be applied to fixed deposits solely owned by the petitioner, directing the bank to allow encashment of the petitioner’s fixed deposits.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 226(3) attachment order fixed deposits

Mohd Akhtar @ Raja v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Sep 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:4011

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a drug syndicate accused under stringent NDPS Act provisions, emphasizing the requirement of reasonable grounds to believe innocence and non-recidivism before granting bail in commercial quantity narcotics cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail drug trafficking

Suresh Chand Sharma @ Suresh Chand v. Ajit Pal & Ors

28 Sep 2022 · Najmi Waziri, J. · 2022:DHC:4347

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal enhancing compensation to 100% functional disability based on fresh medical evidence of severe cognitive and locomotive impairments from a motor accident.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim functional disability encephalomalacia cognitive impairment

INTEX ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SANDEEP KUMAR

28 Sep 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4094

The Delhi High Court modified its earlier order and remanded the infringement and passing off dispute to the trial court for fresh independent adjudication, emphasizing the distinction between statutory and common law rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant infringement passing off statutory right common law right

M/S Vardhman Trading Company v. Delhi Jal Board, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

28 Sep 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4071

The Delhi High Court quashed the blacklisting of a contractor by Delhi Jal Board for failure to provide a formal order and opportunity of personal hearing, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice in debarment proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant blacklisting natural justice show cause notice personal hearing

Ankur Parashar v. The State

28 Sep 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:6041
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between the parties, emphasizing judicial encouragement of amicable resolutions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant matrimonial dispute quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC amicable settlement

Happy Exports v. PayU Payments Pvt. Ltd.

28 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6284
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, affirming that the Court's role is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement and timely filing, without delving into merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Appointment of arbitrator

Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.

27 Sep 2022 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora; Manmohan · 2022:DHC:3962-DB

Delhi High Court consolidates multiple writ petitions challenging the validity of notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing procedural compliance and fair hearing in reassessment proceedings.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Reassessment proceedings Notice validity

Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.

27 Sep 2022 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora; Manmohan · 2022:DHC:3969-DB

Delhi High Court clarified the scope and validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing procedural compliance and limited judicial interference.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Reassessment proceedings Judicial review

Vikas Jain v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Sep 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4006

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternative plot allotment application under the 1961 Scheme, holding that eligibility requires being a recorded owner prior to the Section 4 notification and dismissed the writ petition filed after a 20-year delay.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant alternative plot allotment Scheme of 1961 Land Acquisition Act 1894 recorded owner

Anish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Sep 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:3990-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking disability pension relief, holding that the matter falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal under Section 3(o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.

administrative petition_dismissed disability pension Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Section 3(o) writ petition

Vijay Narain Pandey v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

27 Sep 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4016

The Delhi High Court quashed summons issued under Sections 405/420 IPC due to lack of dishonest intention and abuse of process arising from a 20-year delayed complaint essentially involving a civil dispute.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Cheating Dishonest intention Abuse of process

The State of Delhi v. Santosh Kumar

27 Sep 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4013
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rash and negligent driving case, holding that prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed rash and negligent driving Section 279 IPC acquittal appellate court powers