Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Pradeep Kumar Goyal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10779

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court-appointed Judicial Committee for challenges to sealing orders under Section 345-A of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, dismissing the writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Section 345-A Judicial Committee M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

Shri Hardeep Singh Hanspal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10778
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a serial litigant for unauthorized construction, holding that misuse of the Court’s process with oblique motives warrants dismissal with costs.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ petition abuse of process unauthorized construction clean hands doctrine

Lancers Convent Sr Sec School v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10777

The court held that installation of security gates in public lanes requires prior permission and a No Objection Certificate from Delhi Traffic Police, directing authorities to consider the petitioner's representation in accordance with MCD guidelines.

administrative petition_dismissed Municipal Corporation of Delhi No Objection Certificate Delhi Traffic Police installation of gates

M/S SHRI RAM ASSOCIATES v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

01 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10780

Delhi High Court grants a seven-month extension of a catering stall license at Shridham Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and applying judicial parity with prior similar orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition license extension Indian Railways Catering Policy 2017 territorial jurisdiction

WG CDR Eswara Raghuraj (Retd) v. Union of India and Others

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10767-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, holding that absence of explicit alternate cause by medical boards presumes service-attributability.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension primary hypertension Release Medical Board service-attributability

Prem Pal Singh v. The State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10730
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC inherent powers of High Court matrimonial dispute

Lalit Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10731

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable matrimonial settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS non-compoundable offences

M/S OMAXE LIMITED v. Dr. Madhu Gupta

01 Dec 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10722-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 34 petition as barred by limitation, restoring proceedings for fresh consideration of condonation of delay under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Limitation period Condonation of delay

Ayaz Ahmad @ Javed v. The State NCT of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10729

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a fraud and forgery case after investigation completion, emphasizing that bail is not punitive and imposing conditions to ensure trial attendance.

criminal appeal_allowed bail forged diploma referral to pathological laboratory Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC

Poonam Gahllot v. Directorate of Enforcement

01 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10698

The Delhi High Court held that summons issued under Section 37 FEMA read with Section 131 ITA require personal appearance and are governed by civil procedure, not the Cr.P.C., thus exempting women from personal attendance under Section 160 Cr.P.C. does not apply.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 Section 37 FEMA Section 131 Income Tax Act Section 160 Cr.P.C.

ARM DIGITAL MEDIA PVT. LTD. v. KUMAR KAURAV

01 Dec 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10726
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that employment disputes do not constitute commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act and that civil courts retain jurisdiction over breaches of employment contracts and fiduciary duties, dismissing the defendant’s application to reject the plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Employment Agreement Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Commercial dispute Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Pawan Soni v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10723

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to unreliable identification without a judicial TIP and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, emphasizing the necessity of TIP for credible identification in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade Dock identification Robbery Stabbing

Bhim Sain & Ors. v. Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr

01 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10714

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Masaroor Abbas & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10709

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Sanjeev @ Kake & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10710

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Vikas Kumar and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

01 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10693

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Abhay Gahlot v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10692

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC and Motor Vehicle Act based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

SH GAURAV REDHU & ANR. v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. & ORS.

01 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10691

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

SI Akash; SI Dharmveer Singh v. Akash

01 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10683
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside bail granted in a commercial quantity NDPS case for failure to apply mandatory statutory conditions and held that recoveries from co-accused in a single transaction must be aggregated.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act commercial quantity clubbing of recoveries

Assam Rifles Ex-Servicemen Welfare Association v. Union of India

01 Dec 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10678-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pay parity for Assam Rifles personnel with the Indian Army, holding that pay matters lie within executive domain and directed the petitioner to approach competent authorities.

administrative petition_dismissed Assam Rifles pay parity equal emoluments Article 14