Delhi High Court

29,474 judgments

Year:

VSA Trading Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner CGST and Anr

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10771-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand for fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, emphasizing that writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily available in such complex tax disputes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 Section 107 CGST Article 226 Constitution

M/S A V Metals Marketing Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner CGST and Anr

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10770-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST demand order for fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to avail the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 Section 107 CGST writ jurisdiction

Inder Bahadur Singh v. Additional Commissioner Ward

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10736-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order on fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 fraudulent availment writ jurisdiction

Manpar Exim Inc v. Additional Director, DGGI and Ors.

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10737-DB

The Delhi High Court held that post-amendment, pre-Show Cause Notice consultation under GST Rules is discretionary, writ petitions are not maintainable in fraudulent ITC cases, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit GST Rules 2017 Rule 142(1A) Pre-SCN consultation notice

Aggarwal Traders v. Sales Tax Officer Class II / Avato, Ward 102, Zone 9 & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10735-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST tax demand order but granted liberty to file a delayed appeal with pre-deposit, pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related GST notifications.

tax petition_dismissed Significant GST Act Section 168A Show Cause Notice Appeal limitation

HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED & ANR. v. CAWELS ELECTRIC PRIVATE LIMITED

01 Dec 2025 · Tejas Karia, J. · 2025:DHC:11704

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's well-known 'HAVELLS' trademark, finding a likelihood of confusion and infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Deceptive similarity Well-known mark

Smt. Vandana Rana v. Sh. Bal Singh Rana & Ors.

01 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:11531

The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiff's pre-trial amendment application to challenge a fraudulently procured 2008 Will and mutation of agricultural land, emphasizing a liberal approach under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for effective adjudication of inheritance disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC inheritance dispute challenge to Will

Harish Kumar v. MD Tufail @ Rahees

01 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10890

The High Court upheld the discharge of accused in a rape and criminal intimidation case due to inconsistencies, delay, and lack of grave suspicion at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant charge framing discharge Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

Riya Sekhawat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Dec 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:11056

The Delhi High Court upheld the National Medical Commission's requirement that foreign medical graduates affected by the Russia-Ukraine war must undergo two years of clinical clerkship plus one year internship in India, rejecting their challenge that this was arbitrary and contrary to statutory regulations.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Foreign Medical Graduates Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship Clinical Training National Medical Commission

Deepesh Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

01 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10700

The Delhi High Court held that while the FIR and complaint under the Wildlife Act were valid and the search lawful, the petitioner was discharged due to lack of proof that he was responsible for the school’s management, and no double jeopardy arose from FIR and complaint proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 Section 50 search and seizure Section 55 complaint double jeopardy

Rajat Dwivedi v. Union of India

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10785-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a Tribunal's adjournment order, holding that certiorari jurisdiction does not extend to supervising procedural adjournments or delays in constitution of Larger Benches.

administrative petition_dismissed certiorari jurisdiction adjournment order Larger Bench Tribunal

Union of India v. 657759 EX HFO Pradeep Kumar

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting certiorari interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Mrityunjay v. HFO Madan Singh Retd

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless the employer proves otherwise.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Sachin Dev Sally v. Workers Union and Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10739-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing grant of Dress Allowance to workers and quashing recovery orders, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and nodal department clarifications under the 7th CPC.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Dress Allowance 7th Central Pay Commission Office Memorandum Principles of natural justice

Kusum Devi v. Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation and Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10858
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a grievously injured claimant by increasing functional disability assessment, non-pecuniary damages, and remanding for re-computation of income loss and future medical expenses claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim functional disability loss of earning capacity minimum wages

Boby v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

01 Dec 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10703-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a major daughter who voluntarily appeared and chose to reside with her husband, affirming her personal liberty.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus majority personal liberty Article 226

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Limited v. Rupesh Jha & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10788

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation for loss of future earnings by affirming that functional disability assessment must correlate with the claimant's vocation and extent of physical impairment, not merely the percentage of physical disability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal loss of future earnings functional disability permanent physical disability

Sobat Singh v. Ramesh Chandra Gupta & Anr.

01 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10783

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for pain and suffering and loss of amenities in a motor accident claim, considering inflation and prolonged treatment, while upholding other aspects of the Tribunal’s award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement pain and suffering loss of amenities

Union of India & Ors. v. GP Capt Shashi Kant Mishra (Retd)

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10757-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force officer, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces coronary artery disease primary hypertension

Kumar Singh v. HFO Jai Kumar Giri Retd

01 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities not present at entry are service-related unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board