Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Raj Kumar v. State Government of NCT Delhi & Anr.

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10804

The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court's maintenance order of Rs. 30,000 per month to the wife, rejecting the husband's claim of lower income and unproven adultery.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 CrPC adultery burden of proof

M/S QURESHI MUTTON AND CHICKEN SHOP v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10893

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash summons under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admitted cheque execution raises statutory presumptions and factual disputes require trial, not pre-trial quashing.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Cheque dishonor Statutory presumption

Dr. Manoj Khanna v. Income Tax Office

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10864

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of prosecution against the Managing Director for belated TDS deposit, holding that disputed factual issues require trial and subsequent payment does not absolve criminal liability.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS Income Tax Act 1961 Section 276B

Union of India & Ors. v. 781296 Ex Sgt Lalan Prasad

02 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10852-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ review to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Khumujam Tombi Devi v. Union of India

02 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10817-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner received the requisite benefits from the respondents.

constitutional appeal_dismissed writ petition withdrawal requisite benefits petition dismissed

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Aasiya and Ors.

02 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10847
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award holding the bus driver rash and negligent, relying on consistent eyewitness testimony and the filing of a chargesheet as presumptive evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rash and negligent driving chargesheet presumptive evidence eyewitness testimony

Ramesh v. Brahm Prakash

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10826

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in an assault case due to lack of medical evidence and material contradictions in prosecution testimony, dismissing the victim's appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed acquittal appeal against acquittal proof beyond reasonable doubt absence of medical evidence

Surendra Kumar Chaturvedi & Anr. v. Delhi State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

02 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10873-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal directing refund of deposits with interest where allotment cancellation was not based on misrepresentation, while dismissing delay-barred challenge to the cancellation itself.

property appeal_allowed Significant Housing Scheme Allotment Cancellation Refund of Deposits Misrepresentation

State NCT of Delhi v. Inder Pal

02 Dec 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10863-DB

The Delhi High Court granted leave to appeal against the acquittal of the respondent in a kidnapping and rape case, holding that minor contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony did not justify acquittal at the leave stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 378(1) Cr.P.C. leave to appeal acquittal contradictions in testimony

Central Board of Secondary Education v. Nasheta Zaidi

02 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10720-DB

Delhi High Court held that courts cannot award marks in academic evaluations and must defer to expert examiners, setting aside a Single Judge’s order awarding full marks and directing correction as per expert revaluation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review academic evaluation re-evaluation benefit of doubt

Radhika Nandrajog v. Vijit Nandrajog

02 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10718-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on grounds of mental cruelty, emphasizing cumulative conduct including non-consummation, desertion, and false allegations as sufficient to grant divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) non-consummation

M/S GOGOAL HYDRO PVT. LTD. v. M/S BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ORS.

02 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 5636

The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act for lack of sufficient cause to condone the 101-day delay, reaffirming the strict 60-day limitation period under the Commercial Courts Act for commercial arbitration appeals.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 37 appeal Limitation period

Om Prakash v. State NCT of Delhi

02 Dec 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10763-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition for production of a missing minor girl after her recovery and production before the Child Welfare Committee, with the petitioner reserving other legal remedies.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus minor Child Welfare Committee Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Mariyam @Salma v. The State NCT of Delhi

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10803

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a commercial quantity ganja case under the NDPS Act, holding that the stringent conditions under Section 37 were not met given the prima facie evidence against her.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act commercial quantity bail

Faisal @ Salman @ Rahul v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

02 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10766

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor, emphasizing the gravity of allegations and prima facie evidence against him.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 363 IPC sexual assault minor victim

Union of India & Ors. v. Hav Lalu Pappachan

02 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension primary hypertension armed forces tribunal release medical board

Union of India v. Major Anish Muralidhar

02 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting certiorari review to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Kuldeep Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10833-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an employee may withdraw a voluntary retirement application before its effective date upon material change in circumstances, quashing the rejection of such withdrawal and ordering reinstatement without back wages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant voluntary retirement withdrawal of retirement application locus poenitentiae material change in circumstances

Jain Healthcare Centre v. BSES Rajshani Power Ltd.

02 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10832

The Delhi High Court held that electricity connections cannot be denied solely due to unauthorized construction bookings unless enforcement action is taken, directing the grant of a fresh connection upon compliance with ownership proof requirements.

administrative petition_allowed Significant electricity connection unauthorized construction Municipal Corporation of Delhi ownership proof

Fareha Ahmad Khan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

02 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10831

The Delhi High Court held that penalties imposed under the Commission for Air Quality Management Act must be challenged before the NGT, allowed renovation work within GRAP-II limits, and kept the penalty order in abeyance pending NGT appeal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Commission for Air Quality Management Act, 2021 GRAP-II restrictions