Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging income tax proceedings are maintainable where procedural non-compliance is shown, granting interim reliefs and condoning delays in appropriate cases while directing strict adherence to statutory procedures.
Vinai Kumar Saxena v. Aam Aadmi Party & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining political party defendants from making unsubstantiated defamatory statements against the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi on social media, balancing freedom of speech with the right to reputation.
Ram Chander Soni v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a criminal complaint to the Court where a related FIR is pending to avoid conflicting judgments, while maintaining separate trials.
Krishan Gopal Arya v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking retrospective pay fixation and adjustment to the post of Principal due to lack of evidence of valid promotion and acceptance of TGT post without challenge.
Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court clarified the validity and procedural requirements for notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, granting reliefs in cases of non-compliance while emphasizing judicial review safeguards against abuse.
Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court clarified the validity and judicial scrutiny of reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing compliance with natural justice and limited scope of judicial interference.
ANAND STAMPING (INDIA) v. DSIDC
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking alternative plot allotment or removal of encroachment, holding that the respondent had taken adequate steps to remove encroachment and the petitioner failed to protect the allotted plot.
JMD Buildcon v. Sudha Dewan
The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture of earnest money requires proof of loss, time was not essence of contract, and the defendant must refund Rs. 2.32 crores with interest due to breach and concealment of material facts.
Tata Sons Private Limited v. Hakunamatata Tata Founders & Ors.
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction over foreign defendants operating infringing websites accessible in India and granted permanent injunction protecting the well-known 'TATA' trademark against unauthorized use in cryptocurrency and domain names.
Indcon Boilers Ltd v. Maeda Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow belated documents in non-commercial suits due to inadvertence and clarified the correct classification of suits under the Commercial Courts Act.
Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court clarified the legal and procedural standards for reopening income tax assessments under Section 148, balancing Revenue powers with taxpayer protections.
Indcon Boilers Ltd v. Maeda Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow belated documents in non-commercial suits and clarified the correct classification of suits under the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the petitions challenging such orders.
Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court clarified the scope of judicial review and procedural safeguards in Income Tax proceedings, disposing of multiple writ petitions with directions on interim relief, stay, and condonation of delay.
Sundeep Bhupinder Singh & Anr. v. Oxon Technology Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the condonation of a four-day delay in filing the written statement in a commercial suit, holding that procedural deficiencies can be remedied within court-granted extensions and that the written statement was rightly taken on record.
Arjun Somdutt v. Vivan Somdutt & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified an interim stay to permit attachment and sale of a disputed property to satisfy a partial decree, rejecting the appellant's attempt to frustrate execution proceedings.
Kailash Kumar v. Rudra Dev Deceased & Ors.
The court held that for a stay under Section 10 CPC, the court seized with the earlier suit must have pecuniary jurisdiction to grant relief claimed in the later suit, and dismissed the petition seeking such stay.
Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court adjudicated multiple writ petitions challenging the validity of Section 148 notices and reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory provisions and principles of natural justice.
Alok Malani v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the framing of charges under Sections 420, 468, 471, 34 IPC, holding that prima facie material existed and charges under Sections 406 and 420 IPC cannot be tried together.
Bhagya Shree & Anr. v. M/S National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside dismissal of an employees’ compensation claim for non-pursuit without notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on merits, emphasizing the liberal construction of labour welfare legislation.
Sabharwal Apartments Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22-2, Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court adjudicated multiple writ petitions challenging Income Tax Department actions, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness and granting interim relief where prima facie grounds existed.