Delhi High Court
28,840 judgments
Aayush Goyal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of cyber-fraud facilitating mule accounts, emphasizing the principle of parity, absence of direct evidence, and settled status of the complainant.
Arun Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a serious cyber fraud case after investigation completion, emphasizing prevention of pre-trial punishment and parity with similar cases.
Sir Sobha Singh and Sons Pvt Ltd v. Rajdip Bambawale & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a revocable license to tenants does not confer ownership over common facilities and appointed a commissioner to inspect an unsafe lift, allowing the landlord's appeal for interim relief reconsideration.
Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for rioting and related offences but modified the sentence to release the appellants on probation considering their age, conduct, and prospects for reformation.
Shiv Prashad @ Kartaru v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of POCSO and related IPC charges due to failure of prosecution to conclusively prove the prosecutrix's minority as required under the Juvenile Justice Act.
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi v. Jitender Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that non-renewal of fixed-term contractual employment does not amount to retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Tribunal's order of reinstatement with back wages.
Motor & General Finance Limited v. Director General & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal under the ESI Act, holding that review is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record and that statutory amendments and evidentiary issues not raised earlier cannot be entertained at the review stage.
Jairaj Developers v. Varendhishakt Prdhiesubhaag
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that limitation and cause of action issues require trial and a third party suit enforcing pre-existing rights is not barred by a compromise decree.
ANU v. SURESH VERMA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to grant a summary decree in a partition suit due to unresolved factual disputes, emphasizing that clear and unequivocal admissions are necessary for relief under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Leayan Global Pvt Ltd v. Bata India Ltd
Delhi High Court upheld interlocutory injunction restraining Leayan from using the mark POWER FLEX, affirming Bata's exclusive rights in the trademark POWER and clarifying permissible use of related taglines and stock disposal.
Sagar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a serious sexual offence case against a minor, emphasizing delayed trial and lack of independent evidence while imposing protective conditions.
Hari Singh v. Kitabo Devi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal by modifying the decree to record a settlement whereby the respondent paid Rs. 3,00,000 to the appellant and ordered a partial refund of court fees.
M/S USHA JEWELLERS PVT LTD v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's applications for suspension of sentence in a cheque dishonour case due to non-compliance with mandatory deposit conditions under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing that financial incapacity alone does not exempt such deposit.
Khemo Devi Public School v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court set aside CBSE's disaffiliation order for the secondary level of a school, holding that curable deficiencies must be remedied before imposing such a severe penalty.
Rahul Vattamparambil Remesh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially waived warehousing charges by 50% under Section 151 CPC due to unexplained delay in seeking full waiver, modifying its earlier order.
Tushar Bansal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
M/S J.K. Enterprises v. Superintendent, Delhi North, Ward-24, Zone-1, Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a consolidated SCN for multiple years, confirmed proper service of notices, rejected writ jurisdiction in a fraudulent ITC case, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Mohd. Guddu v. Ganga Devi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and possession decree in a commercial tenancy dispute, modifying the decree to allow continued occupation till June 2026 with payment of arrears, while remanding disputed issues for trial.
Pranij Heights India Pvt Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of an extension order under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act does not vitiate adjudication proceedings and dismissed the writ petition challenging delayed adjudication of a Show Cause Notice.
Manikjeet Singh Kals v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction for adjudication and appeal under the CGST Act is determined by the highest tax demand and procedural objections do not invalidate orders, directing the petitioner to pursue remedy through appeal.