Delhi High Court
28,840 judgments
Jitender v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 354 and 451 IPC but modified the sentence by releasing him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, emphasizing rehabilitation and social reintegration.
Biswabijoyee Panigrahi v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that setting aside of a disciplinary penalty entitles the employee to consequential benefits despite issuance of a fresh charge memo post-retirement, directing restoration of pay and promotion benefits.
Ram Dayal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that seniority must be fixed based on merit at initial appointment, not delayed appointment or confirmation dates, and directed correction of the petitioner's seniority accordingly.
OM 9 Square City Pvt Ltd v. Rail Land Development Authority
The Delhi High Court directed the Rail Land Development Authority to consider the petitioner’s approved development plans expeditiously with a personal hearing and issue a speaking order, despite objections and arbitration clause, as the agreement did not require land handover prior to plan consideration.
Shivam Pandey v. ICICI Bank Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reversal of disputed bank transactions, holding that the petitioner voluntarily authorized the transfers with OTP authentication and the bank followed RBI-mandated procedures, absolving it of liability.
Sehrawat v. Kuldeep
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a candidate whose candidature was arbitrarily cancelled due to a pending FIR that did not result in trial or conviction.
Mohnish Sehrawat v. Izhar Ul Hasan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's petition, holding that a termination order without Lieutenant Governor's approval and contrary to Tribunal directions is invalid.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. DR. ANJNA GANJOO
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of leave salary for sanctioned child care leave with interest on delayed payment, modifying the period based on official records.
Central Provident Fund Commissioner v. Sh Ali Roshan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting pension revision and promotion benefits to an employee whose ad hoc service was delayed due to postponed DPCs, relying on the precedent set in Rajkumar's case.
Harish Vats & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Part-Time Vocational Teachers are entitled to annual Dearness Allowance increases as per government notification, directing prospective implementation from 2026 while denying retrospective relief.
Saroj Rani v. Sumit Saluja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim injunction restraining unauthorized construction and creation of third-party interests on disputed property pending trial.
Jagdev Yadav v. Lokesh Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that summons were duly served on the defendant, affirming the trial court's refusal to set aside the ex parte order.
Lakhpat Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to failure of the prosecution to conclusively identify the dead body and establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Sudesh Kumar v. The State
The High Court set aside the murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence due to incomplete chain of events and reasonable doubt, emphasizing strict adherence to principles governing circumstantial evidence.
Om Prakash v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF constable for overstaying leave, holding that the disciplinary proceedings complied with natural justice and the punishment was not disproportionate.
Anand Tomar v. Pooja Electric Co.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal as not maintainable against an order allowing the plaintiff to bring trademark registration certificates on record without formal amendment of the plaint, holding such orders are not appealable under the Commercial Courts Act.
Damodara Bangera B v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the date of assumption of charge governs financial benefits under promotion orders and denied retrospective increment benefits to a petitioner whose increment fell outside the prescribed period under the relevant Office Memorandum.
Tarakant Sangwani v. Apollo Pipes Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing that seized goods remain under the appellant's custody pending suit disposal, restraining any dealing without court permission.
Narender Kumar Agarwal and Ors. v. Pradeep Gupta and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed recall of a compromise decree obtained by fraud involving forged signatures and misappropriated settlement funds, setting aside the decree passed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Badan Singh Meena v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that epileptic RPF personnel cannot be deployed near running lines or moving machinery and must be placed in suitable alternative posts or supernumerary posts with pay protection pending such employment.