Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Hari Singh v. Kitabo Devi

15 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:11398
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal by modifying the decree to record a settlement whereby the respondent paid Rs. 3,00,000 to the appellant and ordered a partial refund of court fees.

civil appeal_allowed specific performance settlement payment admission court fees refund

M/S USHA JEWELLERS PVT LTD v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

15 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11664
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's applications for suspension of sentence in a cheque dishonour case due to non-compliance with mandatory deposit conditions under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing that financial incapacity alone does not exempt such deposit.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 148 Negotiable Instruments Act suspension of sentence deposit condition

Khemo Devi Public School v. Central Board of Secondary Education

13 Dec 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11314

The Delhi High Court set aside CBSE's disaffiliation order for the secondary level of a school, holding that curable deficiencies must be remedied before imposing such a severe penalty.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disaffiliation CBSE Affiliation Bye-Laws 2018 secondary level

Rahul Vattamparambil Remesh v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1444-DB

The Delhi High Court partially waived warehousing charges by 50% under Section 151 CPC due to unexplained delay in seeking full waiver, modifying its earlier order.

civil appeal_allowed Section 151 CPC warehousing charges modification of order waiver of charges

Tushar Bansal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

12 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:11298

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

M/S J.K. Enterprises v. Superintendent, Delhi North, Ward-24, Zone-1, Delhi

12 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11373-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a consolidated SCN for multiple years, confirmed proper service of notices, rejected writ jurisdiction in a fraudulent ITC case, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit Consolidated Show Cause Notice CGST Act Section 107 CGST

Mohd. Guddu v. Ganga Devi and Anr.

12 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11342-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and possession decree in a commercial tenancy dispute, modifying the decree to allow continued occupation till June 2026 with payment of arrears, while remanding disputed issues for trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order VII Rule 10 CPC possession decree

Pranij Heights India Pvt Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner of Customs

12 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11343-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of an extension order under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act does not vitiate adjudication proceedings and dismissed the writ petition challenging delayed adjudication of a Show Cause Notice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28(9) extension of adjudication period show cause notice

Manikjeet Singh Kals v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11344-DB

The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction for adjudication and appeal under the CGST Act is determined by the highest tax demand and procedural objections do not invalidate orders, directing the petitioner to pursue remedy through appeal.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 jurisdiction appellate authority

Neelmani Electricals v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax

12 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11350-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and left open the validity of impugned GST notifications pending the Supreme Court's decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act show cause notice natural justice

CDL Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Vijay Pal & Ors.

12 Dec 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:11918
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Rajesh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)

12 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11774

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of one appellant for causing grievous injuries under Section 308 IPC while acquitting another due to delayed implication, and modified the sentence of the convicted appellant to the period already served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC grievous injury delayed implication benefit of doubt

GALAX INFRA AND SPORTS v. TUNA ENVIROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED

12 Dec 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Anil v. State (NCT of Delhi)

12 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11688
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC to Section 323 IPC due to lack of intention to cause death, while upholding other convictions and reducing the sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Intention to cause death Voluntarily causing hurt Traffic offence

Axis Finance Limited v. Saurav Shekhar Sinha

12 Dec 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 3 · Cited by 25

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Krishna Murari Bangar v. Central Bureau of Investigation

12 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:11621

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal charges against a government servant alleging conspiracy to manipulate investigations, holding that judicially upheld Scheduled Tribe status and accepted closure reports preclude prosecution without sanction and material evidence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Scheduled Tribe certificate criminal conspiracy Section 197 CrPC sanction

Laxmi Rawat v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

12 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11491
Cites 1 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that absence of documentary proof and complainant's status as housewife do not rebut statutory presumption without credible evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Presumption of debt Financial capacity

Union of India v. Satya Pal Singh

12 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:11479-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction mandating grant of revised pay scales to eligible library staff without awaiting notification of amended Recruitment Rules, dismissing the petition challenging such implementation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant revised pay scales Office Memorandum 24.07.1990 Dr. S.K. Das Committee Recruitment Rules

M/S CONVEY TECH PROJECTS v. M/S H.P TRADING COMPANY

12 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11459

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act but modified the sentence by imposing a higher fine and reducing imprisonment, considering the accused's age and cheque amount.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Sentence modification Imprisonment

Kedar Parsad Meena & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

12 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11296

The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers of High Court Section 482 CrPC