Delhi High Court
97,832 judgments
Baij Nath Mittal v. State Thr. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court suspended the substantive sentences of two appellants convicted for embezzlement, balancing the gravity of offences with humanitarian and procedural considerations pending appeal.
Yashpal Raghav v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming that acceptance of gratification raises a legal presumption of corrupt motive under Section 20, which the accused failed to rebut.
Sarita Arora v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that defence evidence cannot be considered at the charge framing stage, upholding charges framed under Sections 411, 482, and 34 IPC against the petitioner.
COTTAGE INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION LTD v. SUBHASH CHANDER
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for possession on admission after lease expiry, holding that rights are governed by the registered lease deed and subsequent events can be considered to decide the lis.
Dinesh Kumar v. H S Gill
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging unauthorized construction due to lack of evidence, granting liberty to submit fresh proof if violations recur.
Manpreet Singh & Co v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between Manpreet Singh & Co and North Delhi Municipal Corporation.
Pushpal Kumar Mishra v. Vice Chancellor, Jamia Milia Islamia University & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed Jamia Millia Islamia University to grant the petitioner a personal hearing before confirming his three-year debarment, ensuring compliance with natural justice.
Dileep Kumar Singh Bisht v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the IAS appointment of a Tibetan refugee, upholding the Union of India's inquiry findings and refusing to direct a CBI investigation.
Bhanwar Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Sakaldeep v. State (GNCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 489C IPC for possession of counterfeit currency, ruling that police testimony suffices despite absence of public witnesses and minor contradictions.
National Seed Corporation Ltd v. National Commission for SC & ST
The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate service disputes or order reinstatement, and its orders are only recommendatory under Article 338 of the Constitution.
Arvind Kumar v. ED CIL (India) Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that procedural departmental enquiry Rules do not confer vested rights to appoint Defence Assistants from outside the organization and upheld the validity of the 2008 Rules restricting representation to employees only.
Abhishek Bhati v. School Management of GHPS, Punjabi Bagh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of a probationary teacher’s services without prior notice or show cause, rejecting claims of mala fide termination and communal bias.
Bhanwar Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Sakaldeep v. State (GNCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 489C IPC for possession and circulation of counterfeit currency, ruling that absence of public witnesses during search does not vitiate recovery if police testimony is credible.
M.P. Singh Sahni v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner for alleged forgery and abuse of process, emphasizing the necessity of prima facie evidence before summoning and discouraging misuse of criminal law in civil disputes.
M.P. Singh Sahni v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition filed by M.P. Singh Sahni in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3783/2003 in accordance with a detailed common judgment delivered in a related case.
Bimal Kishore Pandey v. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for criminal conspiracy and corruption despite the death of the main offender, modifying their sentences considering mitigating factors.
Rakesh Sharma v. State through C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court disposed of Rakesh Sharma's criminal appeal by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case without providing specific details in this order.
DIRECTORATE OF ADULT EDUCATION v. BIRENDER KUMAR
The Delhi High Court held that the Directorate of Adult Education is an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act, entitling daily wage peons to reinstatement and compensation but not regularization of service.
Akshay Sobti & Ors v. ICICI Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court accepted the parties' joint settlement application and disposed of the civil suits in terms of the settlement under Order XXIII Rules 1 and 3 CPC.
M.G. Shyamalamba v. Whirlpool of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court disposed of an employment dispute writ petition by modifying the award in accordance with the parties’ amicable settlement for ₹8,60,000 as full and final satisfaction of all claims.