Delhi High Court
98,009 judgments
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. M/S Anand Brothers Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award, holding that judicial interference is limited and the arbitrator's reasoned findings cannot be set aside absent fraud, bias, or patent illegality.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that profits eligible for deduction under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act must be computed based on the separate books of the printing unit without allocating publishing expenses, absent evidence of manipulation or non-arm's length transactions.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that profits eligible for deduction under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB must be computed based on the separate books of the industrial undertaking without reallocating expenses of other units, absent evidence of manipulation or non-arm’s length transactions.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act based on the profits of a distinct printing unit without reallocating expenses of the publishing unit, dismissing the revenue's appeals.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act based on profits of a distinct printing unit without reallocating publishing expenses, dismissing the revenue's appeals.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB of the Income Tax Act based on the book profits of a separate printing unit without reallocating expenses from the publishing unit, rejecting revenue's challenge to recompute profits.
Commissioner of Income-Tax Delhi-XV, New Delhi v. Neenu Dutta
The Delhi High Court held that a wrong claim of long term capital gains on ESOP proceeds without concealment does not attract penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that printing units employing workers through sister concerns qualify as industrial undertakings manufacturing articles under Section 80-I of the Income Tax Act, allowing deductions despite job work and rejecting revenue's challenge.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that printing units employing workers through sister concerns qualify as industrial undertakings manufacturing an article under Section 80-I of the Income Tax Act, allowing deductions for profits from such units.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Delhi High Court held that printing units employing workers through sister concerns qualify as independent industrial undertakings engaged in manufacture or production, entitling them to deduction under Section 80-I of the Income Tax Act.
Devender Singh @ Roxy v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused involved in receiving stolen vehicles, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and imposing conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
Mohd. Yusuf v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC due to lack of intention to cause death, reclassifying the offense as voluntarily causing hurt under Sections 321/323 IPC.
Dinanath Batra & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the inclusion of English comprehension as a competitive test in the Civil Services Preliminary Examination but directed the government to reconsider its nature after proper study and consultation.
DELHI JAL BOARD v. M/S KHUB CHAND TYAGI
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting the contractor's claims for unpaid work, escalation, and costs, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited to patent illegality or violation of public policy.
SCHENKER INDIA PVT LTD v. SEARIR TRANSPORT SYSTEM
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that no valid arbitration agreement existed as the original agreement was cancelled and declared void ab initio.
Satish Kumar & Anr. v. Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretion in refusing an ad interim injunction in a suit for specific performance where the agreement provided for liquidated damages and the appellants delayed prosecution.
Vijay Prakash Gupta v. J.N. Prasad
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that delay in filing the appeal was not sufficiently explained and that court records cannot be contradicted by affidavits, thereby refusing to condone delay under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
Mukesh @ Jurra v. The State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Sections 394/397 IPC upon finding he was a juvenile at the time of the offence and transferred the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board.
A.S. Ravi v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for appointment as Assistant Director and payment of allowances, holding he lacked requisite experience and was estopped from retrospective promotion.
MORGAN SECURITIES & CREDITS PVT. LTD. v. B P L LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's discretion to vacate an interim injunction on the respondent's healthcare business transfer to a subsidiary, subject to adequate security to protect the appellant's claim.