Delhi High Court
97,710 judgments
Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....
The Delhi High Court quashed termination and appellate orders against CISF probationary ASIs for violation of natural justice, permitting them to continue training pending lawful proceedings.
Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....
The Delhi High Court quashed the termination and appellate orders against CISF probationary ASIs for alleged recruitment malpractice due to violation of natural justice principles.
Harnam Singh v. M.P. Singh Saini & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Trial Court's refusal to initiate proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for alleged forgery, holding that such proceedings require clear evidence of deliberate falsehood and cannot be based solely on non-appearance or prior affidavit affirmations.
Indian Institute of Planning and Management v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court held that AICTE has no jurisdiction over MBA/BBA courses and quashed its show cause notices against IIPM for conducting such courses without AICTE approval.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. JANVED MEENA
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-stigmatic termination of a probationary government employee accused of bribery, clarifying that termination during probation without inquiry is valid if not founded on proven misconduct.
Satya Dev Lal v. L.G. Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Rule 28 of the Delhi Police Recruitment Rules confers only discretionary power to re-enlist ex-servicemen and ex-policemen as constables and does not create a vested right to reappointment after resignation acceptance, dismissing the petitioner's claim for re-enlistment.
M.P. Singh Sahni v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs against the petitioner registered for the same offence as an abuse of process, emphasizing caution in converting civil disputes into criminal cases.
M.P. Singh Sahni v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal defamation proceedings under Section 500 IPC initiated from civil suit pleadings, holding such prosecutions an abuse of process and emphasizing qualified privilege and caution in summoning accused.
M.P. Singh Sahni v. State & Ors.
The High Court of Delhi allowed the petition filed by M.P. Singh Sahni in a criminal miscellaneous case as per the detailed common judgment delivered on the same date.
M.P. Singh Sahni v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of summons under Section 500 IPC, holding that prima facie defamatory fax messages justified proceeding to trial.
Nishant Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail in a dowry case on condition of payment towards dowry articles and allowed modification of the payment schedule to installments.
Babu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on the reliable sole testimony of a child witness corroborated by medical and scientific evidence, dismissing the appeal challenging the FIR and witness credibility.
Employees Provident Fund Organization v. Rakesh Ranjan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld region-wise promotion through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination as valid under recruitment rules, setting aside the Tribunal's order directing All-India basis selection.
Hari Chand v. UOI
This judgment concerns multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court involving disputes between appellants and the Union of India and Delhi Development Authority, with the judgment pronounced on May 29, 2013.
Shahid Balwa v. The Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that appellants in FEMA adjudication proceedings have the right to cross-examine witnesses whose statements are relied upon, as an essential part of natural justice, and directed the adjudicating authority to allow such cross-examination expeditiously.
Hari Chand v. UOI
Judgment text insufficient to extract substantive legal analysis or decision; contains only case titles, parties, counsel, and procedural details.
Hari Chand v. UOI
This judgment records the hearing and pronouncement of multiple connected appeals involving appellants and the Union of India and DDA before the Delhi High Court.
Hari Chand v. UOI
The Delhi High Court delivered judgment on multiple connected appeals involving land disputes between appellants and the Union of India and Delhi Development Authority.
Hari Chand v. UOI
This judgment addresses a series of connected appeals involving multiple appellants against the Union of India and Delhi Development Authority concerning property-related disputes.