Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
State v. Chaturbhuj Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a bank security guard who fatally shot a man attempting to escape after committing fraud, holding that the guard acted within his right to private defence and duty.
Hillcrest Realty Sdn Bhd v. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Court held that Hotel Queens Road Pvt. Ltd. had become a public limited company in 2002, entitling Hillcrest Realty to voting rights on preference shares due to non-payment of dividends, and invalidated certain share allotments and transfers for non-compliance with statutory provisions, thereby allowing the appeal and directing corrective measures.
Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradeep Kumar Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the suit seeking declaration of title based on sale deeds held invalid by the Supreme Court for violating an injunction, holding the plaint lacked cause of action and was liable to be dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradeep Kumar Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiffs' suit for declaration of title based on sale deeds held invalid by the Supreme Court, ruling no cause of action existed and upholding the binding effect of the Supreme Court's adverse findings.
Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradeep Kumar Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of title based on sale deeds held by the Supreme Court to be invalid due to violation of injunction, holding no cause of action existed.
Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradeep Kumar Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiffs' suit for declaration of title based on sale deeds held by the Supreme Court to be invalid due to violation of injunction, holding the plaint disclosed no cause of action.
H.K. Bharti v. Union of India & Ors.
Disciplinary action for gross negligence in quasi-judicial tax assessment upheld despite absence of mala fide, emphasizing the need for due diligence in official decision-making.
Association of Unified Telecom Services v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court modified an interim stay on BSNL's port charge circulars, relaxing security conditions on private operators and directing lawful recovery of service tax, remanding the matter for final adjudication.
Association of Unified Telecom Services v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court modified an interim stay on BSNL's port charge circulars by relaxing onerous conditions on private operators and clarified BSNL's entitlement to recover service tax in accordance with law, remanding the matter for final adjudication.
Association of Unified Telecom Services v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court modified an interim stay on BSNL's port charge circulars by easing onerous conditions on private operators while affirming BSNL's right to recover dues with appropriate safeguards pending final adjudication.
Association of Unified Telecom Services v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court modified an interim stay on BSNL's port charge circulars, balancing security undertakings and lawful recovery of service tax, remanding the matter for final adjudication.
Meena Premchandani v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Enquiry Officer under Rule 14(2) CCS (CCA) Rules need not be a public servant or employee, validating the appointment of an advocate as Enquiry Officer by Sindhi Academy.
Nestle India Limited & Anr v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that until alignment in 1997, manufacturers could comply with either the IMS Act or the PFA Act without penalty due to irreconcilable inconsistencies between the statutes.
State v. Vinod Pandit
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's finding that the accused was a juvenile at the time of the offence based on authentic school records, emphasizing the primacy of documentary evidence over medical tests in age determination under the Juvenile Justice Act.
CICO TECHNOLOGIES LTD v. M/S SHRIRAM ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that a valid arbitration agreement existed despite respondents' objections, and upheld interim relief during arbitration.
ISHVAKOO (INDIA) PVT LTD v. NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to terminate the arbitrator's mandate and appointed an independent arbitrator to ensure expeditious resolution of a long-delayed arbitration dispute.
P.L. Kalra v. Braham Dutt Saini
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator due to non-compliance with mandatory notice requirements under the arbitration agreement, affirming the necessity of strict procedural adherence before invoking arbitration.
Kumar Nikhil @ Saroj Kumar Shukla @ Jhunnu v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a dowry harassment case due to continuing offence allegations, non-compliance with court orders, and risk of fleeing justice.
HRD Corporation v. GAIL (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the 1999 agreement to supply HDPE wax covers only the plant existing at that time and does not include wax produced at a new plant commissioned later, dismissing the petition for interim injunction.
N. K. Ghai v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld that promotions must strictly follow statutory Recruitment Regulations and administrative resolutions cannot amend or override such rules without prescribed statutory procedure.