Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
M/S KRANTI SOAP PVT. LTD. & ORS. v. M/S DEEP CHAND ARYA INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a trademark infringement suit before the Commercial Court, holding that proper valuation and pleadings satisfy the statutory requirements under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Mohammad Israil v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for protection of a farm house outside its jurisdiction and directed interim police assistance for the petitioner’s residential premises in Delhi.
Jyoti Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner who cooperated with investigation and deposited value of allegedly robbed property, negating need for custodial interrogation.
Mukesh Gupta v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court permitted the appellant to travel abroad for a social and business event during the pendency of his criminal appeal, subject to furnishing security and conditions ensuring his return.
Vijay Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a commercial heroin recovery case under the NDPS Act due to prior convictions, multiple pending cases, and the necessity of custodial interrogation despite absence of public witnesses during the raid.
Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar v. Mr. A.R. Rahman & Ors.
The Delhi High Court examined originality and copyright infringement claims over a Dhrupad musical composition, emphasizing the need to distinguish protectable original elements from traditional public domain aspects in Indian classical music.
Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Ashish Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing appointment of Degree holders to Junior Engineer posts, holding that higher qualifications than the prescribed Diploma do not disqualify candidates absent explicit exclusion.
Vineet Kapur v. Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held that an arbitrary combination of numerals '2929' is inherently distinctive and registrable as a trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
MDD Medical Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi International Arbitration Centre and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the 90-day timeline under MSMED Act is directory, arbitration proceedings can be revived administratively, and jurisdictional challenges must be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Pranav Sharma v. Bhavya Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of a Section 340 Cr.P.C. application alleging forgery of affidavits, holding no prima facie case of forgery was made out and the affidavits were duly attested.
Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushak, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Mr. Amitoj Chadha v. Durgesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an EWS certificate issued before the financial year for reservation benefits, dismissing the government's challenge to the candidate's appointment.
Khilender Gupta v. M/S Hind Food Product & Ors.
The High Court held that a pending intervention application challenging trademark ownership cannot bar the grant of ex parte interim injunction to the registered proprietor and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Court on its Own Motion v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed implementation of NIC's NextGen eHospital system for emergency departments in GNCTD hospitals based on AIIMS evaluation, alongside comprehensive directions for staffing, procurement, and infrastructure development.
Ex Sep Ash Nikhil Mandal v. Union of India
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition to pursue remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal, without expressing any opinion on the maintainability or merits of such application.
M/S V AND L DIAGNOSTICS CENTRE LLP v. M/S CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD
Delhi High Court vacated interim stay on lender's repossession of hypothecated medical equipment due to borrower's failure to initiate arbitration and appointed Receiver and Arbitrator to resolve disputes.
M/S JAI OPTICAL v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without considering the petitioner's medical adjournment request, emphasizing the necessity of empathetic consideration of such requests and adherence to natural justice.
M/S GMT GARMENTS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that uploading a show cause notice under the 'additional notices' tab on the GST portal does not constitute valid service, condoned delay in filing appeal due to lack of notice, and directed the appeal to be heard on merits.
Lalit Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the conduct of Bar Association elections under appointed Election Committees, upheld the requirement of valid Proximity Cards for candidates, and dismissed applications for fresh cards and impleadment after elections concluded.
M/S RAJ INTERNATIONAL v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI WEST
The Delhi High Court held that failure to consider written submissions and ineffective communication of personal hearing notices under the CGST Act violates natural justice, warranting remand for fresh adjudication.
Delhi Development Authority v. Raheja Developers Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Development Authority, as the registered electricity consumer, is liable to pay outstanding electricity dues for the Transit Camp, and Raheja Developers Limited is not liable under the development agreement.