Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Smt. Rinavati v. Union of India

29 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2975

The High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the deceased's family, holding that death due to accidental fall from train with valid tickets constitutes an untoward incident under the Railways Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident compensation

Shafeeq Ahmad & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3024

The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR involving serious sexual offences despite the victim's subsequent marriage to the accused, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be exercised cautiously in heinous offence cases requiring full trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR heinous offences rape

Pratima Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Apr 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:3247

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with an ongoing investigation under judicial supervision, directing expeditious completion and granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the court again if needed.

criminal petition_dismissed judicial monitoring investigation writ petition Article 226

Madan Mohan Sharma v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

28 Apr 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:3040

Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to an accused facing forgery and cheating charges, subject to strict conditions ensuring trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim bail medical grounds forgery Indian Penal Code Sections 420, 467, 468, 471

Communist Party of India (Marxist) v. Income Tax Department, CIR Exmpt 1(1), Delhi

28 Apr 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3322-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices and orders for AY 2016-17 due to lack of proper approval under amended Section 151 and limitation bar, holding that TOLA does not alter the statutory approval hierarchy.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 notice Section 148A procedure Section 151 approval

Kunal v. Union of India

28 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3131

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of a passenger injured by falling from a train, holding that loss of ticket during the incident does not negate bonafide passenger status and awarded statutory compensation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1923 Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident bonafide passenger

Rajeev Neelu Kachwaha Charitable Trust v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Ors

28 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3147-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a licensee NGO has no right to continue possession of government land after cancellation of allotment, directing eviction while mandating consideration of alternate land allotment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant licensee rights temporary allotment government land cancellation of allotment

Bharti Verma v. Aditya Dudeja

28 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3184-DB

The Delhi High Court held that distinct petitions under the Hindu Marriage Act do not justify stay of earlier proceedings and upheld the appellant’s right to cross-examine a key witness subject to costs and expeditious completion.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 9 HMA Section 12(1)(b) and (c) HMA Family Courts Act, 1984

M S Indo Spirits v. Pernod Ricard India Pvt Ltd

28 Apr 2025 · Sachin Datta

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Articles 226 and 227 is impermissible against interlocutory arbitral orders dismissing jurisdictional challenges under Section 16, which must be raised in Section 34 proceedings after the final award.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdictional challenge Section 34 setting aside arbitral award Judicial intervention

Shri Sai Ram Enterprises v. Pr. ADG, DGGI, Gurugram & Anr.

28 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3066-DB

The Delhi High Court held that blocking of Input Tax Credit under GST cannot exceed one year and directed the tax authorities to unblock the credit after expiry of this period.

tax petition_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Blocking of ITC Rule 86A CGST Rules 2017 GST

Hardev Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

28 Apr 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3133

The Delhi High Court held that a 2019 circular amending eligibility for sports incentives could not be applied retrospectively to deny a veteran athlete’s rightful cash incentives and TA/DA for a 2018 international event.

administrative petition_allowed Significant cash incentives TA/DA retrospective application administrative circular

National Council of Educational Research and Training v. Kundan

28 Apr 2025 · Anish Dayal

The Delhi High Court held that termination of contractual employees due to non-renewal of a fixed-term project contract falls outside retrenchment provisions under Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Industrial Tribunal's award for reinstatement and back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(oo)(bb) Section 25F contractual employment

Rajbala v. Kaumudi Rani & Ors.

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3088

The Delhi High Court held that summary suits under Order XXXVII CPC are maintainable against legal heirs of a deceased promissory note holder and directed the Trial Court to reconsider the suit's maintainability accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit promissory note legal heirs

Shomit Finance Limited v. Arun Kumar Sharma

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3091

The Delhi High Court restored a consumer appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to Covid-19 related non-appearance, emphasizing adjudication on merits over technicalities.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant restoration of appeal non-prosecution consumer disputes redressal forum State Commission

Anil Kumar Juneja and Anr v. Ms. Jaya Goyal, Advocates v. M/S Kishan Construction

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3093

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to examine official witnesses under Order XVI Rule 3 CPC despite delay, imposing costs and time-bound conditions to ensure fair trial and prevent delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XVI Rule 3 CPC official witnesses counter-claim examination of witnesses

Harish Sharma v. Anil Chawla

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3094

The Delhi High Court set aside arrest warrants issued against a Managing Director in execution proceedings, emphasizing adherence to procedural protocols and encouraging amicable resolution through payment proposals.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arrest warrants execution proceedings judgment-debtor Managing Director

Sh. Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

28 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:3000

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 based on a voluntary amicable settlement between parties, affirming the court's power to end criminal proceedings to serve justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 528 BNS 2023 abuse of process of law

Panna Lal & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

28 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2892

The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in the date of its order by issuing a corrigendum and emphasized the need for accuracy in court documents.

other other typographical error court order corrigendum judicial records

Rishi Kumar Goel & Anr. v. Mamta Rani

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the question of whether a dispute is commercial and within the jurisdiction of Commercial Courts cannot be conclusively decided on preliminary applications and may be reconsidered at the final trial stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VII Rule 10 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC commercial dispute

Harmukhi Jain v. Madhu Bala Sawai

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3097

The Delhi High Court upheld the restoration of an eviction petition dismissed for non-prosecution, emphasizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities and declining to interfere under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed eviction petition non-prosecution leave to defend restoration of petition