Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Bimla Kapoor and Ors. v. Sangita Bhutani and Anr

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3099
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that striking off a defence under Order XV-A CPC requires mandatory issuance of a show cause notice and opportunity to be heard, setting aside the Trial Court's order for non-compliance with this procedure.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC striking off defence show cause notice natural justice

Si Manoj Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3061-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The petitioner sought and was granted leave to withdraw the writ petition, which was accordingly disposed of as withdrawn by the High Court of Delhi.

other other Procedural writ petition withdrawal High Court of Delhi petition disposed

Sheela Devi v. Faruk

28 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3136

The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against an interlocutory order that does not finally dispose of the suit, and dismissed the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition interim order final disposal

Varsha v. State of NCT Delhi

28 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3139

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere presence of live cartridges without conscious possession or mens rea does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant conscious possession Arms Act, 1959 Section 25 Arms Act Section 482 CrPC

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Vihaan Networks Ltd

28 Apr 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3141-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed BSNL's appeal and upheld the arbitral award granting Vihaan Networks reimbursement under quantum meruit for expenses incurred despite absence of a concluded contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Quantum Meruit

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Dr Shambhuji

28 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3078

The Delhi High Court allowed a belated consolidated written statement by MCD officials subject to costs to avoid further delay in a long-pending civil suit, while dismissing their earlier application for deletion from the parties.

civil appeal_allowed Order I Rule 10 CPC written statement consolidated written statement delay in filing

Saira Khan & Ors. v. M/S National Insurance Co Ltd & Anr

28 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3119

The Delhi High Court held that a separate penalty application under Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees Compensation Act is maintainable after the original compensation award if the employer unjustifiably delays payment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A penalty compensation delay interest on compensation

The Punjab State Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner Central GST Delhi West

28 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3027-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order due to non-service of the Show Cause Notice at the correct address, granting the petitioner a fresh personal hearing opportunity and extending the limitation period.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Service of Notice Personal Hearing Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

Raja Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Council

28 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3025-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to participate in the NDMC's ongoing vending rights survey and directed consideration of his inherited seniority rights pending verification, protecting him from eviction.

administrative petition_allowed vending rights tehbazari status quo Town Vending Committee

Daljeet Singh v. Commissioner of Customs

28 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3071-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that detention of a gold kada worn as a personal religious effect without issuance of Show Cause Notice and personal hearing under Section 124 of the Customs Act is unlawful and set aside the detention.

administrative petition_allowed Significant personal effects gold kada customs detention show cause notice

SAN NUTRITION PRIVATE LIMITED v. ARPIT MANGAL AND OTHERS

28 Apr 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:2973
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court held that a composite suit involving defamation, disparagement, and trademark infringement by social media influencers is not barred by limitation, qualifies as a commercial dispute, and that defenses of truth and fair comment protect freedom of speech, requiring cautious approach to interim injunctions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant defamation disparagement trademark infringement freedom of speech

Sandeep @ Bunty v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

28 Apr 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2996

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a murder case due to lack of direct evidence beyond a co-accused's confession.

criminal appeal_allowed bail confessional statement co-accused Section 302 IPC

Binod Giri v. CBI

28 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3007
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging charge framing against accused in a corruption case, holding that prima facie evidence including intercepted calls and money trail justified proceeding to trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant charge framing demand of illegal gratification Prevention of Corruption Act intercepted calls

Handicrafts and Handlooms Export Corporation of India Limited v. Sh Rehmat Khan & Ors.

28 Apr 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:3020
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a Labour Court award holding that workmen were employees of the petitioner despite contractual arrangements with a third-party contractor, directing compensation for illegal termination.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship industrial dispute illegal termination contract labor

M/S RHINE POWER PVT. LTD. v. M/S RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

28 Apr 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:3075
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that transfers of property in violation of its injunction constitute contempt, and such transactions can be declared void to prevent contemnors from benefiting from their disobedience.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court injunction transfer of property pendente lite third-party rights

Dainik Tribune v. Amit Suneja & Ors.

25 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2966

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging maintainability of a defamation suit against a newspaper, granting liberty to raise maintainability objections before the trial court and directing adjudication in accordance with law.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural defamation maintainability Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 newspaper as party

Walimuddin Khan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2893-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Assistant Chargeman (Signals) in BRO holding Diploma qualifications are entitled to the 6th CPC revised pay scale of Rs. 5,000-8,000 retrospectively from 1996, regardless of the promotional nature of their post.

service_law petition_allowed Significant Sixth Central Pay Commission revised pay scale Assistant Chargeman Signals Border Roads Organisation

M/S. Modern Snacks Private Limited v. Kamran Ghani

25 Apr 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2905

The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark 'MARDEM' for deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered mark 'MODERN' in Class 30, upholding the petitioner's proprietary rights and goodwill.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant trademark infringement deceptive similarity prior adoption rectification of trademark register

Pravinast Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2889-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary advices and partial APAR grading modifications against a BSF officer, limiting judicial interference to procedural fairness and material support.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant APAR Advice Displeasure Staff Court of Inquiry

Lalit Choudhary & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

25 Apr 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2935

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a bona fide settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita matrimonial dispute settlement deed