Delhi High Court
98,981 judgments
MUFG BANK LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions filed by MUFG Bank Ltd. relating to income tax proceedings following compliance with a previous order and consent of the revenue authorities.
Jamil Ahmed & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all related proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their expressed unwillingness to continue prosecution.
Subash Pal v. State of NCT
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 822/2014 and all related proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their consent to discontinue prosecution.
Rahul Chaudhary and Ors. v. State of NCT and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 821/2014 and all proceedings therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their consent to discontinue prosecution.
Dhurendra Raghav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension with arrears to the petitioner if similarly placed as in prior judgments, with interest payable on delayed payments.
Delhi Contract Bus Association v. Honble Lt. Governor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court treated the petition seeking exemption from road tax and penalty as a representation, directing the authorities to decide it after hearing the petitioners within six weeks.
Rohit Sharma v. A.M. Market Place Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ex parte order against the defendant, holding that service by one mode of summons is sufficient and the defendant forfeited the right to file a written statement by missing the 120-day deadline.
Atul Bidhuri v. The State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of grievously injuring a police officer by running him over with a vehicle, emphasizing the balance between personal liberty and public interest in serious offences.
Ishika v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity heroin, holding that the bar under Section 37 NDPS Act applies and conspiracy was established through call records.
Sheetal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Rakesh Kumar Dahiya v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions under NDPS Act for possession and conspiracy but set aside conviction under Section 25 for vehicle use, reducing sentences considering mitigating factors.
Sheetal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Rakesh Kumar Dahiya v. State
Delhi High Court upheld Sheetal's conviction for possession of cocaine but reduced her sentence, set aside Rakesh Dahiya's conviction under Section 25 NDPS Act while affirming his conspiracy conviction, emphasizing strict interpretation of Section 25 and procedural compliance under NDPS Act.
Shaurya Challana and Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Centrax Gas Turbines Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and ordered dissolution of Centrax Gas Turbines Private Limited under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 after finding compliance with all statutory requirements.
Shyam Sunder Sethi v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an appeal filed with a condonation of delay application is pending under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and the designated authority erred in rejecting the petitioner's application on the ground of non-admission of the appeal.
GTL Infrastructure Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from similar agreements despite one agreement providing for a three-member tribunal, holding that post-petition unilateral arbitrator nomination is impermissible.
Prem Chandra Thakur v. Central Industrial Security Force
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a confirmed CISF constable for suppression of criminal antecedents was unsustainable where he had been cleanly acquitted prior to application and no departmental inquiry was held, directing reinstatement with continuity of service.
Union of India v. Archana Wadhwa & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order granting 2017 Rules benefits to pre-2017 CESTAT members, holding that statutory provisions preserve their earlier service conditions.
Rohan Kapoor & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute.
Prashant Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate's provisional appointment for failing to meet the prescribed eligibility cut-off date despite COVID-19 related delays, affirming the validity of fixed cut-off dates in recruitment processes.