Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Union of India and Ors. v. Col. Randheir Singh (Retd.)

24 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2891-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired Colonel, ruling that consistent medical opinions of service aggravation cannot be disregarded solely because the disability onset occurred in a peace area.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Release Medical Board service connection

Surya Manufacturing Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:2928-DB

The Delhi High Court held that income tax liabilities extinguished under an approved insolvency resolution plan cannot be reopened or enforced by the Income Tax Department.

tax petition_allowed Significant Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Clean Slate Theory Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A(d)

Goodrich Carbohydrates Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

24 Apr 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:2898-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot disregard the appellate order of the CIT(A) and must give effect to it, directing the AO to comply with the appellate order deleting the addition for delayed EPF contribution.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 36(1)(va) Employees’ Provident Fund Employees’ State Insurance

J Gopal Mirchandani v. J Dayal Mirchandani & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · AIR 1954 SC 280

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly registered and uncontested Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, exempting the petitioners from furnishing security bond.

civil petition_allowed probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Will Section 276

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited v. SPML Infra Limited

24 Apr 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:3234

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal despite respondent's objections on fee enhancement and bias, holding that apprehension of bias alone does not warrant substitution and fee issues already adjudicated cannot be reopened.

other petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Tribunal Extension of mandate Unilateral fee enhancement Apprehension of bias

Sarabjeet Singh @ Binny v. State

24 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3306

The Delhi High Court held that police cannot hand over possession of immovable property during investigation and restoration of possession can only be ordered by a criminal court after conviction, dismissing the petition seeking such relief prior to trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant restoration of possession illegal dispossession Section 456 CrPC police authority

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Quippo Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

24 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3213-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding that a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained if the penalty notice does not specify the limb of penalty and the issue is debatable with full particulars furnished by the assessee.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271(1)(c) penalty Income Tax Act, 1961 penalty notice defect concealment of income

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Delhi v. M/S Wrigley India Pvt. Ltd.

24 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:2881-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that AMP expenses incurred in the normal course of business do not constitute separate international transactions for transfer pricing and cannot be benchmarked using the Bright Line Test.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Advertising Marketing and Promotional expenses AMP expenses transfer pricing international transaction

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Kiran Verma & Bharat Verma

24 Apr 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3315

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to recall anticipatory bail granted to respondents accused of gold smuggling, holding that reasonable apprehension of arrest justified bail despite ongoing investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. gold smuggling customs offence

AAPKA HUMDUM SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES LLP v. HARSH DODEJA

24 Apr 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:3323
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the loan dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator scope of judicial scrutiny prima facie arbitration agreement

Union of India v. M/S GR-GAWA R(J.V.)

24 Apr 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 636
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 34 arbitration challenge as barred by limitation, holding that filing without the arbitral award is non est and cannot be cured by later rectification beyond the statutory period.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act non est filing limitation period arbitral award

Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Dr Vikas Saroha & Anr

24 Apr 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:3419
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the loan dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator scope of judicial scrutiny prima facie existence

RAM KRISHAN ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. v. ASIAN HOTEL (NORTH) LTD

24 Apr 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:3490
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitrator's mandate for alleged non-disclosure and conflict, holding that statutory grounds for disqualification were not met and the arbitration must proceed.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 Section 12 Section 34

Union of India v. Inland World Logistics Pvt. Ltd

24 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2867-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award for compensation due to lease termination, affirming limited appellate interference under the Arbitration Act and rejecting new grounds raised for the first time in appeal.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Arbitral Award

SS Sehrawat v. UOI and Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2866-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the removal order of a CISF officer for procedural violations in disciplinary inquiry but directed his compulsory retirement with pension benefits due to superannuation and delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant principles of natural justice disciplinary proceedings defence assistant sexual harassment complaint

Ram Dhar Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

24 Apr 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2900

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder and robbery, emphasizing the circumstantial nature of evidence, prolonged custody, and imposing strict conditions to protect trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC CDR evidence

Naveen @ Sandeep v. State NCT of Delhi

24 Apr 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:2901

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Sections 302/34 IPC, holding that the gravity of offence alone cannot deny bail and imposing conditions to safeguard the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC Section 302 IPC murder

Chizoba James v. State of NCT of Delhi

24 Apr 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:3037

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to a foreign national accused of commercial quantity narcotics offence, holding that procedural delays under Section 52A NDPS Act do not warrant bail absent prejudice and that stringent bail conditions under Section 37 apply.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 52A NDPS Act commercial quantity bail under NDPS Act foreign national accused

Great Eastern Energy Corporation Limited v. Sopan Projects

24 Apr 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:3715
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of a sole arbitrator due to undue and unexplained delay in rendering the arbitral award, emphasizing the public policy of speedy dispute resolution under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 termination of arbitrator mandate undue delay

Shweta Dutta v. Veena Dutta & Ors.

24 Apr 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:2969

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint for partition cannot be rejected for no cause of action or limitation without proof of relinquishment of share, but directed the plaintiff to pay ad-valorem Court fees or face rejection.

civil other Significant partition suit intestate succession General Power of Attorney sale deed