Ex Sep Ash Nikhil Mandal v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 25 Apr 2025 · 2025:DHC:2988-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
W.P.(C) 5294/2025
2025:DHC:2988-DB
administrative other

AI Summary

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition to pursue remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal, without expressing any opinion on the maintainability or merits of such application.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 5294/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5294/2025
EX SEP ASH NIKHIL MANDAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shashank Shri Tripathi, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Bhardwaj, CGSC
WITH
Ms. Lavanya Kaushik, Mr Amit Singh Rana and Ms. Manpreet, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
25.04.2025
JUDGMENT

1. After some hearing, Mr. Shashank Shri Tripathi seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition by submitting that he would be moving an appropriate application before the Armed Forces Tribunal[1].

2. We do not express any view as to whether any such application would be maintainable or even if it is, the merits of such application. If any such application is moved, it is for the Tribunal to deal with the application. We express no view thereon. “Tribunal” hereinafter W.P.(C) 5294/2025

3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J