Delhi High Court
31,999 judgments
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Central Plastics Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the Assessee satisfactorily explained share capital receipts under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and that such receipts were not taxable income when received through banking channels from genuine investors.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sumit Mudgal
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing re-examination of a candidate declared medically unfit, emphasizing that medical boards must provide reasons when disregarding specialist opinions.
Narubiona Pranathi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate cannot be allowed to change her NEET (UG) category to PwD after the application and correction deadlines and after appearing in the exam under the non-PwD category.
Bhupender Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penalties for fraudulent ITC under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, holding that such penalties are valid if contemplated in the show cause notice and that writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for complex factual disputes in GST fraud cases.
Manju v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition acknowledging concurrent proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Randhir Jaiswal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's application under Rule 29 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 within four weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action and procedural fairness.
MS Fiberfill Engineers & Anr. v. MS Rampur Engineering Company Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that civil revision petitions and Article 227 petitions against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts are barred by Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and such jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly to uphold legislative intent.
M/S TULIKA ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. M/S ALLIED TUBES PVT. LTD.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow additional documents in a commercial suit before framing of issues, dismissing the petition under Article 227 for lack of any gross illegality.
SURAJ KAPUR v. SUBODH GUPTA
The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s valuation of a suit for injunction reliefs and dismissed the petition challenging it, holding that valuation by the plaintiff must be accepted unless shown to be arbitrary or unreasonable.
UDAANSURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. MS SAPNA GOYAL
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s belated written statement to be taken on record with costs, emphasizing discretion to condone delay caused by unavoidable circumstances while ensuring expeditious trial.
Goodrich Maritime Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Rashvinz Exports
The High Court allowed the petitioner to examine an additional witness despite the witness not being listed, emphasizing fairness and the absence of objection from the respondent.
Vinod Kumar Sharma v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court granted limited interim protection restraining the bank from proceeding under the SARFAESI Act to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal once it became functional.
Rajesh Sharma v. Akhil Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize and expeditiously dispose of the petitioner’s pending application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC to protect his rights to perform religious duties.
Malik Traders v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Hari Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the Sentence Review Board’s rejection of premature release for a life convict, emphasizing the need for reasoned decisions considering reformative potential beyond the gravity of the offence.
R Archith Sai v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed a Review Medical Board to reassess the petitioner’s fitness for Navy Flying Branch appointment post-hernia surgery, with the decision to be binding on both parties.
Dilawar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed an application to correct its earlier order by recording the appearance of the respondents' Counsel, issuing a corrigendum to maintain accurate court records.
MR AJAY & ORS. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 377, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of a mutual settlement and divorce by consent, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Sh Giri Nish Kumar alias Girnesh alias Bobby and Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be unfair and an abuse of process.
Rakesh Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the principle that criminal cases can be ended in the interest of justice when disputes are resolved voluntarily.