Delhi High Court

31,999 judgments

Year:

M/S MOHAN EXPORTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. KARAN PAL SINGH & ANR

07 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:5684

The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award of reinstatement and back wages due to failure to record reasons and improper consideration of the employer-employee relationship, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Labour Court Reinstatement Back wages Employer-employee relationship

M/S Sentinels Security Pvt. Ltd. v. Vinod Kumar

07 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:5638

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s finding of illegal termination and directed compensation to the workman, emphasizing the management’s burden to prove abandonment and the workman’s entitlement to relief absent contrary evidence.

labor petition_dismissed Significant illegal termination workman abandonment of service burden of proof

Jairaj Developers LLP v. Varendhishakt Prdhiesubhaag & Ors.

07 Jul 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:5586
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance based on an undated receipt due to delay, lack of readiness and willingness, absence of a valid contract, and upheld the final decree arising from a family settlement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance Order VII Rule 11 CPC limitation readiness and willingness

ACUITY KP SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 1(1), DELHI & ORS

07 Jul 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5433-DB

Delhi High Court held that failure to pass final assessment order within statutory time after ITAT remand renders proceedings time barred, entitling petitioner to refund with interest.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 143(3) time barred assessment transfer pricing

Salesforce.com Singapore Pte. Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(1)(2), International Taxation, New Delhi & Anr.

07 Jul 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5321-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 cannot be initiated while original assessment is pending and ruled that CRM receipts do not constitute Fees for Technical Services under the India-Singapore DTAA, setting aside the impugned reassessment order.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Reassessment

Bray Controls South East Asia Pte Ltd v. Commissioner of Income (Tax International Taxation) - 1 & Anr

07 Jul 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5329-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration of a Nil withholding tax certificate application, directing the petitioner to furnish a current valuation report to determine tax liability on unlisted share transfer.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Nil withholding tax certificate Section 195(2) Income Tax Act Section 264 Income Tax Act Fair Market Value

M/S Delhi Mahila Samaj Trust v. Gayatri and Anr.

07 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:5532

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award on reinstatement and back wages following an amicable settlement between the parties.

labor other Labour Court award reinstatement back wages amicable settlement

IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD v. M/S PCL BRAHMAPUTRA CONSORTIUM LTD (JV)

07 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:5521-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging arbitral awards, holding that maintainability objections regarding joint venture status and authority must be raised early and that the arbitrator's findings on price escalation claims were binding.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37 Joint Venture Agreement Maintainability of Arbitration

Shambhavi Agencies & Ors. v. Havells India Ltd

07 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:5523-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a recovery suit involving parties and disputes outside the arbitration agreement cannot be referred to arbitration under Section 8, especially when non-signatories are involved, affirming the Trial Court's order dismissing the Section 8 application.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act arbitration agreement non-signatory guarantor

Arsalan Feroze Ahenger v. National Investigation Agency

07 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:5522-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under stringent Section 43D(5) of UAPA, holding that prima facie material showed his involvement in terrorist conspiracy and incitement via social media.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant UAPA Section 43D(5) bail terrorist act

Edith Dawa v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5431-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate's application for failing to explicitly meet prescribed educational qualifications, affirming that courts cannot expand or reinterpret recruitment criteria through equivalence exercises.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant recruitment essential qualifications equivalence of degree judicial review

Sachin Amar Kholwad and Ors. v. Union of India and Others

07 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5333-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing promotions based on inter-se seniority at initial appointment, ruling that qualifying departmental exams do not determine seniority under the Recruitment Rules 2015.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Recruitment Rules 2015 Promotion Seniority Departmental Examination

Sky Cable Industries & Anr. v. M/S KKM Overseas Private Ltd.

07 Jul 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:5506-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a summary decree passed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to lack of clear admissions and remanded the matter for trial on disputed issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC summary judgment admission discretionary power

Samyak Jain v. Superintendent (Adjudication), Central GST Delhi

07 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5346-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order involving fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act with condonation of limitation.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit GST Section 107 CGST Act Writ jurisdiction

RSA Impex LLP v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.

07 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5435-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to consider the petitioner's reply and grant a personal hearing, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST Act Section 168A show cause notice personal hearing

SBI General Insurance Company Limited v. Ganpat Singh

07 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5467
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, upholding the Commissioner’s award based on unrebutted evidence establishing employer-employee relationship and emphasizing that appeals lie only on substantial questions of law.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 30 appeal employer-employee relationship substantial question of law

Principal Commissioner of Customs (ACC Imports) v. Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd.

07 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5400-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CESTAT's decision allowing Nokia India's refund of customs duty based on a chartered accountant's certificate proving non-passing of duty incidence, setting aside the order directing refund amounts to the Consumer Welfare Fund.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant customs duty refund chartered accountant certificate incidence of duty Consumer Welfare Fund

BABA GLOBAL LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 29 & ORS

07 Jul 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5336-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an Assessing Officer cannot review an order under Section 148A(d) and that a notice issued beyond the limitation period under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is invalid, quashing the impugned notice and order.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Section 148A Income Tax Act limitation period reopening of assessment

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Sunil Kumar

07 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5424-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of disciplinary proceedings against an employee accused of polygamy due to lack of sufficient evidence and procedural fairness, ordering reinstatement without back wages.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry principles of natural justice polygamy bigamy

Arti Sharma v. GNCTD and Ors.

07 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5370-DB

The Delhi High Court held that age relaxation for Anganwadi workers applies generally to all candidates including unreserved category applicants, and remanded the matter for reconsideration of the petitioner’s eligibility.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant age relaxation Anganwadi worker reservation unreserved category