Delhi High Court

32,111 judgments

Year:

Rajender Kumar Verma and Others v. Government of NCT Delhi & Anr.

04 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:5240

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings under IPC and SC/ST Act based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principles in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Amritpal Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

04 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:5259

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the Court's inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process of law.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS Section 498A IPC

Sagar Rajendra Kumar Mangla v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:5272

Delhi High Court grants a 7-month extension of license for operation of a railway catering stall accounting for Covid-19 closure period, affirming its jurisdiction and following precedents.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition license extension Indian Railways catering stall

Conqueror Innovations Private Limited & Anr. v. Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited

04 Jul 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:5233

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction applications, holding that the defendant's 'Find Device' feature does not infringe the essential elements of the plaintiffs' registered patent and noting non-working and delay as additional factors.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Patent Infringement Interim Injunction Communication Device Finder System Non-erasable Security Features

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Saroj Nagar

04 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5265-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting ex post facto approval of study leave to a government employee where the competent authority unduly delayed sanction despite timely application.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant study leave ex post facto approval government service leave sanction

Rehan Ahmed Khan v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5299-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the writ petition for fresh consideration of the applicability of a 2020 Office Memorandum on pension benefits for service prior to 2004.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Old Pension Scheme New Pension Scheme Office Memorandum 11.06.2020 pensionary benefits

Mangal Deep v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5303-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act Notification validity

Mangal Deep v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5300-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for lack of opportunity to be heard and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Section 73 CGST Act Section 168A CGST Act principles of natural justice

Pramod Kumar Yadav v. Union of India and Ors

04 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5316-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after receiving promotion, leading to its disposal by the High Court.

administrative other writ petition promotion withdrawal disposal

Ex Inspector Sanjay Kumar v. Sh. Ajay K. Bhalla and Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5317-DB

Contempt petition dismissed as respondents complied with court order on retiral benefits; entitlement to interest is a separate issue to be pursued via writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt proceedings retiral benefits Last Pay Certificate wilful disobedience

Lt Col R Sanjay v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5301-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition by Lt. Col R Sanjay, allowing him to pursue the matter before the Armed Forces Tribunal.

administrative other Procedural writ petition withdrawal leave to withdraw Armed Forces Tribunal petition disposal

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Rohit Goel

04 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5247-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of disciplinary penalty imposed without supplying the Inquiry Report or hearing, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant natural justice disciplinary proceedings inquiry report opportunity of hearing

Delhi Factory Owners' Federation v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:5295

The Delhi High Court held that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has jurisdiction to levy conversion charges in industrial areas under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act and Master Plan for Delhi, 2021, and that the DIDOMA Act does not confer exclusive authority on DSIIDC to collect such charges.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant conversion charges Municipal Corporation of Delhi Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Management Act, 2010 Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

State v. Yogesh @ Golu & Anr.

04 Jul 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:5252

The Delhi High Court condoned a 325-day delay in filing a State revision petition challenging discharge in a serious offence case, emphasizing a liberal approach balanced with the need to prevent systemic delays.

criminal petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay revision petition Section 5 Limitation Act Section 482 CrPC

Kiran Pal Singh Bajwa v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

04 Jul 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:5251

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with sexual assault obtained by false promise of marriage and impersonation of a police officer, holding that prima facie material negated consent and bail was not warranted.

criminal appeal_dismissed regular bail false promise of marriage impersonation of public servant Section 376 IPC

Ajay Kumar v. State

04 Jul 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:5249

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery but granted him the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, modifying the sentence despite the mandatory minimum under Section 397 IPC.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 397 IPC mandatory minimum sentence benefit of probation

Amit Jain & Ors. v. Anila Jain & Ors.

04 Jul 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:5293
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed Plaintiffs' suit for declaration of title based on unregistered customary documents, holding that such documents do not confer ownership and the suit is barred by limitation and law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Unregistered documents Transfer of Property Act Specific performance

Pacifica Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Township Project Buyers Association

04 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5291

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the NCDRC order permitting the respondent access to documents and time to file a reply, holding that there was no illegality warranting interference under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission supervisory jurisdiction consumer complaint

Sushil Kumari v. Sanjay Saxena

04 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5289

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to file a delayed site plan due to e-filing technical issues, directing strict compliance with timelines henceforth.

civil petition_allowed ejectment suit site plan delay condonation e-filing portal

M/S Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt Ltd v. Rajesh Kumar Patwari

04 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:5288

The High Court directed the petitioner to deposit the decretal amount before the State Commission and kept the attachment warrants in abeyance pending compliance.

civil petition_dismissed Execution Petition Decretal Amount Warrant of Attachment State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission