Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 04.07.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, CRL.M.C. 2029/2025
MR AJAY & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Petitioners in person
Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State/R-1
Inspector Rambir Sharma, East District Respondent No. 2 is present in person
& Ms. Simran Singh, Advocates
JUDGMENT
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0453/2016, registered at P.S Mayur Vihar Ph-1 under sections 498A/377/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.
2. The marriage between Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 29.11.2012 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at Delhi. No child was born out of the said wedlock. It is submitted that due to temperamental differences, the couple started living separately since 01.05.2016. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 filed a petition under section 12 of DV Act and also lodged the aforesaid complaint case against Petitioner No.1 and his family members.
3. During the proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Settlement Deed dated 12.07.2024. In pursuance of the Settlement, the parties jointly filed a fresh petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The learned Family Court, Karkardooma Courts allowed the mutual divorce petition on 16.09.2022, thereby dissolving the marriage between the Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2. It is submitted that all the previous complaints and litigations initiated by the parties has been withdrawn and all conditions of the Settlement Agreement have been fulfilled including the payment of the total settlement amount of Rs. 14,50,000/- (Rupees fourteen lacs fifty thousand) as per the schedule mentioned in the Settlement Deed. The copy of Settlement Deed dated 12.07.2024 has been placed on record as Annexure P-3.
4. All the petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer Inspector Rambir Sharma from East District.
5. Respondent No.2 confirms that the matter has been settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has received the payment of the entire settlement amount of Rs. 14,50,000/- (Rupees fourteen lacs fifty thousand) from the Petitioners as per the Settlement Deed. She further submits that she has no objection if the FIR No. 0453/2016 is quashed against the petitioners.
6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 0453/2016 is quashed.
7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-
affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."
8. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 0453/2016, registered at P.S Mayur Vihar Ph-1 under sections 498A/377/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.
9. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR NO. 0453/2016, registered at P.S Mayur Vihar Ph-1 under sections 498A/377/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.
10. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J JULY 04, 2025