Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
M/S Religare Finvest Ltd v. Bellpoly Moulders Pvt Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of execution petitions following settlement and payment by respondents, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn and vacating interim orders.
Unicorn Denmart Ltd v. Vatech Global Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that failure to file the mandatory affidavit under Order XXXVII Rule 3(4) CPC renders summons for judgment invalid, entitling the defendant to unconditional leave to defend without deposit of the entire claimed amount.
Dr Prayash Thakur v. State
Delhi High Court directed transfer of multiple FIRs involving common accused to the Crime Branch for coordinated investigation.
Pridhumngaur v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The Delhi High Court upheld the suspension of a student from hostel accommodation pending a fair and timely inquiry into allegations of misconduct, directing completion of the inquiry within ten days.
M/S.ESTERA REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED v. MRS.GEETA DATT AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the DRAT's interim direction to deposit unearned increase amount, holding that prima facie views cannot be acted upon without hearing the auction purchaser on merits.
Shaktirana v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs under Sections 323, 341, 354, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between neighbours, emphasizing restoration of peace and ends of justice.
Rai-Iul Sharma & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs and criminal proceedings arising from a trivial dispute after the parties voluntarily settled their differences amicably without coercion.
Sunaina Saini v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail granted to unmarried sisters-in-law accused of vague dowry harassment allegations after completion of investigation and charge sheet filing.
SOMENTI DEVI VERMA AND ORS. v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years, and subsequent purchasers have locus standi to seek such declaration.
Paramjeet Kaur v. Kuldeep Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a General Power of Attorney terminates upon the death of the executant, invalidating subsequent sale deeds executed thereunder, and refused to grant the appellant another opportunity to file evidence after failing to do so at trial.
Shakuntla Devi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not tendered within five years of the award, even if physical possession is claimed to have been taken.
Gopal Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 stand lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act where physical possession and compensation payment have not been completed.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Gian Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the invalidation of a departmental enquiry for non-supply of documents, confirmed failure of the employer to prove misconduct thereafter, but modified the award of full back-wages to 50% considering delay and circumstances.
The Pr. Commissioner of Wealth Tax Central-3 v. Padma Dalmia
The Delhi High Court upheld that valuation of jewellery under Wealth Tax Rules remains valid for four years and a search does not mandate fresh valuation, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
The Pr. Commissioner of Wealth Tax Central-3 v. Padma Dalmia; The Pr. Commissioner of Wealth Tax Central-3 v. Raghu Hari Dalmia
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision directing the use of an older jewellery valuation report valid for four assessment years, rejecting the Revenue's claim to rely on a later valuation prepared post-search.
Amit Agarwal v. Religare Securities Ltd
The High Court allowed the petition to grant the accused one final opportunity to lead defence evidence despite procedural errors, subject to costs and conditions.
Vijay Pal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a courier agent accused under the NDPS Act, holding that absence of mens rea and conscious knowledge of contraband justifies bail with conditions.
Yogesh Kumar & Anr. v. Baljit Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a possession decree, holding that symbolic possession under a registered agreement suffices under Section 53A TPA and that unchallenged ownership evidence entitles the plaintiff to possession.
Narender Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court dismissed revision petition, affirming conviction and sentence for rash and negligent driving causing death under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.
Arvind Kumar Saxena v. State
The Delhi High Court held that failure to file a charge-sheet within 60 days entitles the accused to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC, and the petitioner arrested for possession of 250 grams of heroin was rightly granted bail on this ground.