Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Shreeji Overseas India Pvt Ltd v. PEC Ltd

14 Mar 2018 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; C. HARI SHANKAR · 2018:DHC:1807-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused condonation of over three years' delay in filing, emphasizing strict enforcement of limitation and insufficient cause for delay despite imprisonment of the appellant's directors.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation court fee arbitration award

Perfect Mechanical Industries v. Delhi Jal Board, Govt of NCT of Delhi

14 Mar 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:1810

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding no arbitration agreement existed due to the omission of the arbitration clause and inapplicability of dispute resolution provisions under the contract.

civil petition_dismissed arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Contract Agreement Clause 18.1.[1]

HPCL- Mittal Energy Limited v. Artson Engineering Ltd.

14 Mar 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:1808

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for failing to consider the petitioner's counter-claim and for granting unsubstantiated relief, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned awards in accordance with contract terms under the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Section 31(3) Arbitration Act Section 28(3) Arbitration Act

N N Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

14 Mar 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:1809

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing claims for damages on premature foreclosure of a contract under clause 13, holding that bona fide abandonment justifies such foreclosure and limits compensation to executed work and reasonable costs.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Clause 13 foreclosure Abandonment of work

Shri Romi Garg v. BDR Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.

14 Mar 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:1801

The court held that the remedy for a prior purchaser under an Agreement to Sell lies under Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and dismissed the plaintiff's application to restore a suit seeking nullification of subsequent Agreements to Sell and related documents.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 19(b) Specific performance Agreement to Sell

Devi v. M/S New Times

14 Mar 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1813

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an eviction petition, remanded the case for amendment of pleadings and further evidence, and directed expeditious disposal considering the petitioner's advanced age.

civil appeal_allowed eviction petition bona fide need amendment of pleadings further evidence

Tara Chand v. Suman Lata

14 Mar 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1812

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide need grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting tenant's claim of alternative commercial use of other premises due to lack of credible evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed eviction bona fide need Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 landlord's prerogative

Sat Parkash & Anr. v. Ravinder Kumar

14 Mar 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:1811

The Delhi High Court remanded an eviction case for amendment of pleadings and further evidence, holding that bona fide need under Section 14(1)(e) requires strict proof and grounds related to reconstruction must be pleaded under other clauses of Section 14(1).

property other Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 14(1)(f) Section 14(1)(g)

Rajesh Kumar v. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

14 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1802
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Court held that suspension must be reviewed within 90 days and directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s revocation request due to unexplained delay in review beyond the statutory period.

administrative other Significant suspension review of suspension subsistence allowance statutory period

Ajay Mehrotra v. Management Development Institute (MDI) and Ors.

14 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1805

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that disciplinary proceedings arising in Gurgaon must be challenged in the courts having jurisdiction there, not in Delhi.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction departmental disciplinary proceedings dismissal from service Management Development Institute

Shashi Kumar Shrivastava v. Directorate of Education and Anr.

14 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1806

The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to reconsider the petitioner's promotion and grade pay claims with a speaking order, ensuring compliance with earlier judicial directions.

administrative other promotion Lab Assistant grade pay seniority

Ataullah Khan v. Satyawati College and Ors

14 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1804

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to hold the Departmental Promotion Committee meeting within specified timelines to consider the petitioner’s promotion, leaving substantive reliefs open for future consideration.

administrative other Departmental Promotion Committee Limited Departmental Examination promotion procedural directions

M/S SMC COMTRADE LTD v. M/S NARNOLI BUILLION & ORS

14 Mar 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:1800

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a recovery suit for non-prosecution, granting the plaintiff a final opportunity to lead evidence with strict timelines and costs imposed to ensure fair trial and prevent procedural abuse.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XI Rule 12 CPC Section 340 CrPC non-prosecution discovery application

Vayam Technologies Ltd v. Hewlett Packard Financial Services (India) Pvt Ltd

14 Mar 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:1798-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to stay invocation of unconditional bank guarantees, reaffirming that such guarantees are independent contracts and injunctions against their invocation are granted only in cases of egregious fraud.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bank guarantee injunction arbitration unconditional guarantee

K.S. Chauhan v. New Delhi Municipal Council

14 Mar 2018 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2018:DHC:1799

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting the petitioner’s claims for disproportionate reduction in license fees and procedural non-compliance, dismissing the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 license fee reduction pro-rata reduction

Jaibir Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

14 Mar 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:1790-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging non-selection in CAPFs-2012, holding that selection depends on marks, post preferences, and vacancy availability.

administrative petition_dismissed CAPFs recruitment Constable (GD) post preference cut-off marks

Gurmeet Singh @ Satpal v. NCT of Delhi

14 Mar 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:1791-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting the defence of sudden fight and intoxication, relying on the truthful eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC interested witness

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. SPS Engineering Ltd.

14 Mar 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:1787

The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for claims under contract clause 7.0.9.0 runs from the completion and final billing of substitute work, setting aside the arbitrator's award rejecting IOCL's claim as time-barred and remanding the matter for fresh determination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limitation Act, 1963 Contract termination Clause 7.0.9.0

Jatinder Khanduja v. Jagdish Khanduja

14 Mar 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:1786
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered Gift Deed and dismissed the appellant's claim of exclusive ownership under an unproved family settlement, granting possession and injunction in favor of the respondent.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Gift Deed family settlement possession mutation

Sucheta Negi v. UOI & Ors.

14 Mar 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:1803

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging recovery of excess deputation allowance, directing the petitioner to file a representation and the respondent to pass a speaking order in accordance with deputation rules limiting pay protection and deputation period.

administrative other deputation allowance pay protection deputation rules excess payment recovery