Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Pramod Kumar v. The State GNCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Daman Preet Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380 and 411 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vineet Kumar Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.
Naveen Kumar and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
M.R. Chanchal v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Bharat Sah v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition after the minor son was recovered, produced before the court, and expressed his free will to stay with his elder brother, requiring no further judicial intervention.
Revacure Lifesciences LLP v. State Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against the petitioners for offences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and IPC, holding that police lack jurisdiction under the D&C Act and no prima facie IPC offence was made out, with the FIR also barred by limitation.
Ranjan Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused found with commercial quantity of Heroin, emphasizing strict application of Section 37 NDPS Act and rejecting bail on procedural grounds and parity with co-accused.
Prakash Chand Joshi v. Union of India and Ors
The High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition on seniority re-fixation due to non-impleadment of necessary parties, granting liberty to file afresh.
Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Hav Birendra Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless rebutted by the employer.
Pardeep Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition on jurisdictional grounds, directing the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for service matters concerning civilian personnel in the Indian Navy.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex- Sgt Vimal Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that diseases manifesting during service are service attributable unless proven otherwise by the employer.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Hav Raghubir Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by clear evidence.
Deepak Khanduja v. Pukhraj Gulecha and Company
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of an appeal against an interim order after the main suit was decreed, holding the appeal infructuous.
Tata Play Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of anti-profiteering provisions under GST but remanded the matter for factual determination of profiteering by Tata Play Ltd.
Seven Seas Lights Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner, Shahdara Division CGST
The Delhi High Court held that uploading GST notices on the portal constitutes valid service and allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal despite limitation, dismissing the writ petition for non-service.
Surender Kumar Wadhwa v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-18 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that both jurisdictional and faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment and that notices issued within the extended limitation period under the Income Tax Act, 1961 are valid.
M/S EMPIRE FASTENERS v. THE ASSISTENT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that both Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, dismissing the petition challenging jurisdiction.
State v. Shiv Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a public servant in a corruption case, holding that proof of both demand and acceptance of bribe is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Sarita Khatri & Ors v. Govt. of NCTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to convert long-serving temporary supervisors under the ICDS scheme into permanent employees, affirming that prolonged continuous service in regular posts mandates regularization despite initial temporary appointments.